2.5 / 5 Stars
This was one of the more confusing books I’ve read this year. I just could not put my finger on the tone, pacing, character development, and relationship development which left me scratching my head. The book is clearly trying to invoke Romeo and Juliet: Jules Capelthorne has to save her great-aunt’s bookshop from being bought by Roman Montbeau’s family. The Capelthornes and Montbeaus have been feuding for centuries and even though Jules had a crush on Roman growing up, nothing can happen now because of this feud and because, you know, he is trying to take her family’s livelihood away. But because of its nods to the Shakespearean story, I felt like everything got muddled.
Here are something I liked:
✴️ It was an easy, quick read.
✴️ There is a side story with Charlie, a graduate student, who comes in to help sort their antique books and they discover a diary from a member of Jules’ family. This family member was accused of being a witch in the 1600s and there is a whole Antique’s Roadshow style subplot with it.
✴️ I liked Jules’ great aunt Flo. She is kind and quirky. She raised Jules so they have a strong bond. Aunt Flo’s name threw me off though. I am not sure if there isn’t the same connotation for Aunt Flo(w) in Britain but every time I read her name, I couldn't help but think of menstruation.
Things that left me very confused:
✴️ Roman’s family opens up a bookshop DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET from Jules’ family owned bookstore that’s been there for 100 years. And he admits that it didn’t have to be a bookshop, but her bookshop is likely to go out of business anyway so it’s not personal, it is business. Look, I am clearly 10000x more petty than Jules is because if a man ever tried to take anyway my family’s business (oh and also leave my aunt without a home because her apartment is on top of the bookshop), I would never, ever, ever look at him with anything other than rage, vengeance, and spite. There would never be romantic feelings between us no matter how hot he was. I wouldn’t be like “it’s on – it's a battle of the bookshops.” I’d say “it’s a battle of my fist on your face, dude. Get as far away from me as possible.” NO SIR. Never.
✴️ Everyone in the town is constantly mentioning how handsome Roman is. The taxi driver. A married school teacher. Her friend who is literally engaged to Roman’s friend. Her great aunt’s 80 year old friend. Everyone one. Is Roman like Helen of Troy or something? Is that the only thing he has going for him? Why didn’t they have more nice things to say about his personality? OH RIGHT, because he is not a nice person (imo).
✴️ Somehow, Jules does develop an attraction for Roman. I thought about all of their interactions by the time that they kiss and I think they total an hour of face-to-face time plus some hours at a wedding so maybe four hours? FOUR HOURS AND A KISS AND ROMAN DECLARES THAT HE IS IN LOVE? Insta-love feels almost too tame for this.
✴️ I think here is where the Romeo and Juliet angle adds to the confusion. For the first half of the book, the only Romeo and Juliet related aspect that is alluded to is the family feud. But there are so many other historic family feuds that would have been more appropriate. Perhaps whatever is the British version of the Hatfields and McCoys? And then we get that insta-love after only interacting for four hours, which to be fair is a part of Romeo and Juliet. But Romeo and Juliet are teenagers and I think I expected something more grounded and believable for two grown adults.
✴️ I think the need to connect to Romeo and Juliet also threw off the pacing. The reason Romeo and Juliet works is because it all happens within the span of a few days and everything keeps getting heightened. The pacing in this book was so much slower. They would have very few interactions (see my four hour calculation) over the course of a month and then would be in love and then we’d hear about coffee dates and then he’s asking her to run away with him. It’s like a car going 15 MPH, then revving up to 100 MPH, and then jerking to a stop, revving up again, then hitting a speed bump too hard, etc. Like my car metaphor, it was confusing, anxiety inducing, and gave me whiplash.
✴️ Oh, and they actually talk about how they are like Romeo and Juliet in the book which just felt too on the nose.
I think at the end of the day, I wanted something that alluded to Romeo and Juliet but because it was a contemporary romance about adults, it would be more grounded and realistic. But maybe that is impossible with such a wild, larger than life, hard to relate to, piece of source material. I think there will be folks who will like this book, but I am just not the right audience because I had different expectations for this book and had wanted a steadier pace and more steady character development.
You will probably like this book if you like:
📖 Romeo and Juliet-esque vibes
📖 Rivals to lovers
📖 He falls first
📖 No spice (kissing only)
Thank you Avon and Harper Voyager and NetGalley for providing the eARC! All opinions are my own.
Publication Date: August 19, 2025
_________________________
Mid-Read Thoughts: There are nods to Romeo and Juliet all over the place (beyond just their silly last names) and I have A LOT of thoughts.
Pre-Read Thought: There is a "Battle of the Bookstores" and a "The Battle of the Bookshops" and they both have very similar color palettes for their covers... I am sure that is not going to be confusing for anyone. 🤣
Well, I will be reading this one. Perhaps, I shall read the other one someday and do a Battle of the Battle of the Bookstores/shops.