Don’t you just love it when a book has had its copyright renewed 3 times, the latest being in 2013, and there’s a grammar mistake in the 2nd paragraph of the first page? And it doesn’t stop there! You can hardly go more than two pages without an obvious editing error – grammar, punctuation, incorrect word choice, missing words, uncorrected changes from first person POV to 3rd person POV, et cetera and so on.
I realize that this is either the first or second book that the author ever had published (original copyright is 1997). I also realize that this is the first book in a series that, to date, has at least 10 books. But the first book in a series is like the flagship of a fleet. It needs to be good; actually, it needs to be better than good if the author is to entice readers to buy a second and future novels.
And this book wasn’t good. It had an excellent premise, but that premise got lost in a myriad of errors and faulty constructs. And, apparently, the author has never seen fit to give his flagship an overhaul.
First, the main protagonist, Stanley Turner, is portrayed as just about the most oblivious, naïve, wishy-washy late 1960’s college-age male facing the Vietnam War draft that I have ever seen (or read about). You see, I am only a year younger than Stanley was portrayed as being. And even though I am female and was not subject to the draft in those years, every guy I knew in college was. Every last one of those guys knew every option in every military branch open to them on a daily basis. And yet Stanley was written as the ostrich with his head in the sand, not knowing his options, not even checking them out until it was too late, just hoping the war would end before he graduated. The word “unrealistic” doesn’t even begin to describe this set-up.
Secondly, there was the section of the book concerning the court-martial proceedings. Even in 1970, hearsay evidence was not allowed, evidence had to be documented, presumptions were squashed and court-martials were not public. The author’s lack of research in this area is appalling.
And these are just the most obvious of the poor constructs. There are simply too many, large and small in scope, to describe in this review.
However, there was one redeeming value to this book. The author may have portrayed Stan as naïve and wishy-washy, but Stan was also consistently portrayed as an honorable and good man, a man who loved his wife and family, a man with a conscience and the guts to follow that conscience.
In reality, it took over half the book to get to the action, the murder mystery. That first half slogged through an overload of background and biographical material on Stan. It also contained material on other characters and situations without relating that material to our protagonist. And the author failed to establish a creditable timeline in relation to these scenarios.
Normally, I would have abandoned a book with such a plethora of problems well before that halfway mark. However, I won the 5th book in the series, Deadly Distractions, in the Goodreads Giveaway Program. I knew that I wouldn’t be able to give that book an honest review without at least reading the first book in the series. So I purchased this book to try to get a feel for the main character and the basis for the series. And I fought with it to the last page.
I surely hope that 5th book is better.