3.5, rounding down to 3 stars. In terms of the messaging and themes, I would give this book 100/10; Fr. Boyle serves as a spiritual guide for me, and his unwavering commitment to the principle that there is no person in this world too broken to be beloved by God is a message that I deeply resonate with and hope to emulate throughout my life's work. I was enchanted, as I have been reading all of his works, by his devotion to the idea that everybody belongs to God and also each other, and I feel that his ultimate purpose of this particular book -- to highlight that one of the biggest barriers to progress (and contributors to our national divide) is this poisonous, pervasive idea that there are "good" and "bad" people (and subsequently, these "bad" people are deserving of demonization and should be excluded from society) -- is an incredibly pertinent and important message for our current political climate.
Fr. Boyle does a superb job of making clear and defending the book's central thesis, which is an argument for shifting the narrative from painting people who stand across the aisle as bad people to simply people who require healing. As he succinctly points out, "no one healthy storms the capitol or is a racist" but rather people who are deeply ill and in need of compassion, cherishing, and support, the same way we would provide a person with physical injury or a less insidious mental health issue. The need for healing can not touch their unshakeable goodness or alter the fact that, as people, they belong to us. I love his continued insistence that the social justice movement is not inconsistent with Christian beliefs, but rather a completion and fulfillment of them. Certainly, after reading, I feel galvanized to increase my impact on my local community.
The vignettes he includes of the "homies" are funny, touching, and powerful. But I found that the connections that he draws between these two elements -- the spaces where he should be reflecting on these stories and connecting them to the book's overall purpose -- fall a bit short. I wish that either he would let the stories speak for themselves, or break them down explicitly with compelling analysis. Instead, it feels as though he picks a middle ground of these two options, providing a surface-level breakdown of the point of his story by tying it back in to the end of the chapter, but never going quite far enough in analysis to say something truly groundbreaking, making it feel as though he is holding back because he is not trusting his audience to "get it", which makes the impact suffer. For this reason, although I LOVED the content, I have to give this book a 3 star rating -- it just didn't do /enough/ for me. Though I suppose this could just be an artifact of myself not being a member of the intended audience; perhaps my personal values were too aligned to learn anything truly new from this book.
"Tenderness is the highest form of spiritual maturity". Perhaps my new favorite Fr. Boyle quote ever. I want to continue to center this idea as I move through this new year.