3.5 stars
As a fellow autist, I was very much looking forward to forward to reading Clara Törnvall's The Autists. Other than a few issues (that put more of a damper on my reading experience than I wish), which I'm going to touch on, I really enjoyed the overall of this book.
First, what I liked. The Autists is a mixture of a memoir in which the author shares and explores her own background of being autistic and getting a much later-in-life diagnosis, and a book that explores a history of autistic people, art and literature created by autistic people, the science of autism, the treatment of autists, the medicalisation of autism, and more. It explores ideas like feral children, holy fools, and changelings having often been autistic. It looks at numerous women in literary history (Emily Dickinson, Beatrix Potter, Virginia Woolf, Doris Lessing, Patricia Highsmith, Simone Weil, etc) who were most likely autistic. It takes a look at how autism was treated by psychiatrists and society at different points throughout the twentieth century. It deals with some seriously fascinating subjects, that were interesting to read about, especially from an author concerned specifically with autistic women. The memoir aspect was interesting enough, and fairly relatable, but I think I was drawn in more by the history and literature, which are something of special interests of mine.
I also wanted to address a specific critique I read in a number of others' reviews that I find interesting. A number of other reviews I read essentially said that many readers didn't enjoy the way the book was organised and were surprised that it was so disordered considering how much autistic people tend towards preferring things be organised and orderly. This was interesting to me because it's the exact kind of stereotype that stands between autistic people and being recognised as autistic. I really enjoyed the way the book sort of ebbed and flowed, and I felt like things were ordered in a way that felt natural. It felt like an exuberant conversation between myself and a fellow autistic friend.
And for what I didn't like. I wasn't entirely comfortable with the way the book talked about or used functioning labels. It even starts to address this, and then really doesn't do more than scratch the surface of why people have issues with them. I wasn't keen on how the book totally dismissed ongoing struggles faced by LGBTQ+ people, basically acting like the work is done and autistic people should only be so lucky to have the same treatment as LGBTQ+ people, especially in combination with multiple queer women being discussed without their queerness entering into it much, or without discussing the intersection of autism and queerness as a whole. In fact, other than the convergence of autism and being a woman, the book isn't really intersectional at all, and it really focuses on cis able-bodied white women. I also found a little bit of what was said in regards to physical disability, when it was mentioned at all, to just have a weird vibe to it. For example, I didn't care for her comparing being autistic to being deafblind. These little details really put a damper on my experience. Like it could have been a five star book for content for me, but instead it's a three and a half because other than being much less inclusive than it could be, some of it just felt a little bit like progressive-in-a-dated-way vibes.
Overall, I did get a lot out of The Autists, and I enjoyed reading it. I think it's worth the read for anyone willing to get past its flaws because it gives a great personal, historical, and cultural exploration of autism. The translation isn't the first I've read Alice E. Olsson, and I continued to enjoy her work here. It's a flawed book, but one that I enjoyed despite those flaws.