So this is basically Virginie Despentes (attitude, humour) in a country where social inequality, poverty, organised crime and femicide are huge problems. This book has so much energy and personality. And I knew it was going to be interesting from the first page, seeing how that rebellious punk outlook - and being the 'messy woman' of 2010s English-language fiction and TV - works in, and translates to, an environment where life is a lot more dangerous for women than in western Europe.
It often adds up to this:
"But life’s a gamble and I went all in, ’cause why the fuck not."
And unfortunately sometimes this:
"It was one of those moments when you think you’re cheating death, but really the joke’s on you."
There is so much propulsive, instinctive lifeforce in the keeping-going-ness of many of these characters.
Also keeping some of them going is religion, belief in the supernatural and an afterlife. The psychological necessity of that in a riskier environment, with a higher death rate, is palpable here. Yet, in Reservoir Bitches thinking that way is not always useful to the living, and sometimes you (would) survive by turning to rationalism.
My favourite of the stories was 'Playing with Fire'. It has a structure some may find clichéd, but it's quite a long time since I'd read anything of that type, and it's the only one like that in the collection.
When these stories are in dialogue with other literature it's natural and never laboured.
The Despentes influence is seamless and appropriate, the only arguable drawback (as also found in some of Despentes' own work) that real people like this are not necessarily as self-aware as these narrators.
A character is recommended to read Selva Almada by a psychologist. (Not having read Almada myself, I don't know what other influences she may have here. But GR friends who know her work will soon enough read this and make some observations.)
A chapter in 'La Huesera' has to be connected to 'The Part About the Crimes' in Bolaño's 2666, yet it emerges naturally from a character's internet search. I say 'connected' because, although Bolaño wrote that twenty years earlier, he was a man, living in Spain at the time, even if he had previously been a journalist and activist in Mexico - and de la Cerda is a Mexican woman activist who has worked in low paid jobs and whose cousin was a victim of a femicide. "Inspired by" feels all wrong - she is closer to the events and the risk even at time of writing; she would have had something to say about it all regardless.
I did hear it said during the 2010s that too much of Mexican culture that was successful abroad was about poverty, narcos and other crime, and this was (negatively) stereotyping the country. And in the last few years, poverty has been reduced in Mexico. Rightly or wrongly, it does seem that some of the most exciting Mexican literary writing, coming to the attention of awards in the Anglosphere, is set in these worlds (e.g. Fernanda Melchor's Hurricane Season). Never having been to Mexico, and not knowing people from the country (there are not a lot of Latino/a/x people in the UK outside London), I really don't know to what extent some people live untouched by these aspects of life, as in there was never anyone from school, or an old job, or a distant relative, and never been a victim of crime themselves - or if it is the background hum and risk that I get the impression it is even for people in boring middle class circles, though more so in some regions than others.
But as it seems conditions are likely to get worse for plenty of people in countries around the world, there is something inspiring about many of these characters, and the drive that permeates the book.