Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Windowpane #1

Windowpane

Rate this book
The first published book from London-based Joe Kessler, Windowpane consists of a series of allegorical comics shorts that showcase the developing talent of one of the UK's most exciting young cartoonists.

Windowpane was launched at the 2012 Brooklyn Comics and Graphics Festival, alongside an exhibition at London's 18 Hewett Street gallery, to critical acclaim:

"Windowpane is likely to be the best looking book you will hold this year." - The New Statesman

"Windowpane from Breakdown Press is if not THE book of the show, certainly one of the prime contenders." - Comic Book Resources

"This was one of the best comics I read in 2012 by an artist who uses the means of reproduction as a powerful storytelling tool." - The Comics Journal

40 pages, Paperback

First published November 1, 2012

43 people want to read

About the author

Joe Kessler

15 books24 followers
Joe Kessler is a cartoonist based in London. He is the author of Windowpane (2018), winner of the 2020 Angoulême Festival’s Fauve Révélation, and The Gull Yettin (2022).
Kessler is also the Art Director of the English underground comics publisher Breakdown Press.

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
7 (35%)
4 stars
6 (30%)
3 stars
5 (25%)
2 stars
2 (10%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 of 1 review
Profile Image for Adam Stone.
2,062 reviews32 followers
December 12, 2018
This anthology of short fables felt really flat to me. I didn't connect with any of the characters, the stilted dialog, or the way the word balloons were often colored to match the background, thus making them more difficult to read.

It gave me the same impression as the very worst academic poetry. Lots of vague images, hastily assembled, to give the impression of wisdom and depth. But there's no emotional weight, no real character growth, and the visuals are unappealing.

The blurbs on the back read as though you're standing in an art gallery, and a series of amateur critics are trying to sound impressive by attributing vague concepts to each image and nodding any time someone else says anything, hoping to appear smart enough to "get" the, frankly, underwhelming art.
Displaying 1 of 1 review

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.