3.5 stars
Maybe you expected this, but with Jonathan Karl being a journalist rather than a political scientist or analyst, his book is largely just a narrative of events and not so much an insightful analysis of why Donald Trump managed to win the 2024 election, as well as what his election means from this point forward. That is indeed good for the profession of journalism, that a prestigious journalist like Jonathan Karl (and he's one of my favorite political journalists out there) largely just sticks to the facts rather than inserting excessive amounts of his own perspective / spin.
But there are two issues there, as far as a book like this is concerned. For one, this was one of the most watched, most closely followed presidential elections in history. Very little of what Karl recounts in this book is unknown to the public, particularly the type of people who would want to read this book. He does have some interesting tidbits of knowledge here and there, from exclusive conversations he had, or recounting details that may have been underreported. But I was already aware of about 80-90% of what he describes in this book.
The other more pressing issue is, what I really want to know is WHY this happened. Karl hypothesizes that Trump's election was "the greatest comeback in political history". Which begs the question: how did he do it? And retelling the story of Biden's debate disaster, withdrawal from the race, and emergence of Harris doesn't really answer the question. Trump won, yep. But why? And how? These are the questions burning in my mind, and I don't know that I got much closer to answering a critical question like this one. Because, and pardon me for showing my true colors here, but we simply cannot ever let something as abominable as this ever happen again. We cannot ever again in history elect a felon / rapist / narcissist / despot like Donald Trump to the highest office ever again, so I'd love to know why and how he did so, so we can stop it from happening in the future.
That said, I have the utmost respect for Jonathan Karl's work, and I appreciate his attention to detail and his efforts to tell a story as objectively and fairly as possible. No journalist is truly free of bias, but Karl is still able to give a truthful and accurate narrative, much as he may have a strong distaste for everything that occurred.