I don't know what it was about this book - the length of the paragraphs, the density of text on the page - but I couldn't really get with the flow until the last chapter or so. Instead of reading and meditating, often normal for me in a book like this, I found myself skimming in the hope of finding a way in.
I don't doubt I will read it again. I made quite a few notes on the way through. But there isn't a forest of bookmarks jutting out of the book as there normally is for something like this.
2019 -
I finally got around to reading this book again - and it was a struggle, as before. Not sure why this is - but I have made notes this time:
The familiar stories, traditions and rituals of Israel enabled them to know the practical significance of this. They were stories and traditions of individual human beings whose lives were interlaced with God's action. Abraham, David, Elijah were well known to all. And the routinely practised rituals of Israel were often occasions when God acted. Everyone knew that whoever trustingly put themselves in his hands as this poor scandalous woman did, were in the hands of God. And God's deeds bore out his words.
When he announced that the 'governance' or rule of God had become available to human beings he was primarily referring to what he could do for people God acting with him. But he was also offering to communicate this same 'rule of God' to others who would receive and learn it from him. He was himself the evidence for the truth of his announcement about the availability of God s kingdom, or governance, to ordinary human existence.
This explains why, as everyone saw, he did not teach ‘in the manner of the scribes’ but instead as ‘having authority in his own right’ (Matt. 7:29). Scribes, expert scholars, teach by citing others. But Jesus was, in effect, saying, ‘Just watch me and see what I say is true. See for yourself that the rule of God has come among ordinary human beings.
'Already during Jesus’ earthly activity,’ Hans Kung has pointed out, ‘the decision for or against the rule of God hung together with the decision for or against himself.’ P27
The human job description (the ‘creation covenant’, we might call it) found in Chapter 1 of Genesis indicates that God assigned to us collectively the rule over all living things on earth. We are responsible before God for life on the earth (vv. 28-30)
However unlikely it might seem from our viewpoint God equipped us for this task by framing our nature to function in a conscious, personal relationship of interactive responsibility with him. We are meant to exercise our 'rule' only in union with God, as he acts with us. He intended to be our constant companion or co-worker in the creative enterprise of life on earth. That is what his love for us means in practical terms.
P30
Our 'lives of quiet desperation’, the familiar words of Thoreau, are imposed by hopelessness. We find our world to be one where we hardly count at all, where what we do makes little difference, and where what we really love is unattainable, or certainly is not secure. We become frantic or despairing.
In his book, The Doors of Perception, Aldous Huxley remarks, 'Most men and women lead lives at the worst so painful, at the best so monotonous, poor and limited that the urge to escape, the longing always been one of the principal appetites of the soul.’ They are relentlessly driven to seek in H. G. Wells's phrase, 'Doors in the Wall' that entombs them in life.
Huxley was sure that 'the urge to escape from selfhood and the environment is in almost everyone almost all the time.’ Therefore the need for frequent 'chemical vacations from intolerable
selfhood and repulsive surroundings' would never change. The human need could only be met, in his view, by discovery of a new drug that would relieve our species without doing more harm than good in the long run.
P 95
Some of the more significant passages stressing the transformation of status under God are the 'Song of Moses and Miriam' in Exodus 15, the prayer of Hannah in 1 Samuel 2, the story of David and Goliath in 1 Samuel 17, Jehoshaphat's prayer and battle in 2 Chronicles 20 and the 'magnificat' of the virgin Mary in Luke 1. Psalms 34, 37,107 and others celebrate this theme of God's hand lifting up those who are cast down and casting down those lifted up in the human scheme. The reigning of God over life is the good news of the whole Bible: 'How beautiful upon the mountains are the feet of him who brings good tidings, who publishes peace, who brings good tidings of well-being, who publishes salvation, who says to Zion, "Your God reigns!'" (Isa. 52:7)
P 137
Some attention has recently been paid to twelve-year-old or fourteen-year-old children who kill people for no apparent reason. Commentators have remarked on the lack of feeling in these young killers. But when you observe them accurately, you will see that they are indeed actuated by a feeling. Watch their faces. It is contempt. They are richly contemptuous of others—and at the same time terrified and enraged at being ‘dissed’ which is their language for contempt.
P 170
The first and second requests directly concern God’s position human realm. The first one asks that the name of God should be held in high regard. ‘Hallowed be thy name,’ the old version has it.
In the biblical world names are never just names. They partake of the reality that they refer to. The Jewish reverence for the name of God was so great that especially devout Jews might even avoid pronouncing it. Thus we do not really know how Yahweh, as we say it, really is to be pronounced. The pronunciation is lost in history.
Today very few people any longer understand what it means to ‘haIIow’ something and are apt to associate hallow only with ghosts and Hallowe’en. So we would do better to translate the language here as ‘let your name be sanctified.’ Let it be uniquely respected.
Really, the idea is that his name should be treasured and loved more than any other, held in an absolutely unique position among humanity The word translated ‘hallow’ or ‘sanctify is hagiastheto. It is basically same word used , for example, in John 17:17, where Jesus asks the Father to sanctify his students, especially the apostles, through his truth. And it appears again in 1 Thess. 5:23 where Paul expresses his hope that God will ‘sanctify’ the Thessalonians entirely, keeping them blameless in spirit, soul and body until Jesus returns. In such passages too the term means to locate the persons referred to in a separate and very special kind of reality.
P 284
In the distant outworkings of the Protestant Reformation with its truly great and good message of salvation by faith alone—that long-accepted division has worked its way into the very heart of the gospel message. It is now understood to be a part of the ‘good news’ that one does not have to be a life student of Jesus in order to be a Christian and receive forgiveness of sins. This gives a precise meaning to the phrase ‘cheap grace’, though it would be better described, as ‘costly faithlessness’.
P330
The fifth of the Ten Commandments says: ‘Honour your father and your mother,’ and then adds ‘that you may enjoy a long life in the land the Lord your God gives to you’ (Exo. 20: 12). And Paul notes that this is ‘the first commandment with a promise attached to it’ (Eph. 6:2)
The promise is rooted in the realities of the human soul. A long and healthy existence requires that we be grateful to God for who we are, and we cannot be thankful for who we are without being thankful for our parents, through whom our life came. They are a part of our identity, and to reject and be angry with them is to reject and be angry with ourselves. To reject ourselves leads to sickness, dissolution and death, spiritual and physical. We cannot reject ourselves and love God.
When the breach in the human soul that is self-rejection remains unhealed, the individual and thereby society, is open to all kinds of terrible evils. This is where the Hitlers come from. And for every Hitler who rises to power, there are millions who consume themselves and die in quiet corners of the earth. The final words of the Old Testament address this profound problem. Speaking of an ‘Elijah’ to come they state that ‘he will turn the heart of the fathers to the children and the heart of the children to their fathers lest I come and smite the land with a curse.’
Consumer Christianity is now the norm. The consumer Christian is one who uses the grace of God for forgiveness and the services of the church for special occasions but does not give his or her life and innermost thoughts feelings and intentions over to the kingdom of the heavens. Such Christians are not inwardly transformed and not committed to it.
P 375
Now in fact, the patterns of wrongdoing that govern human life outside the kingdom are usually quite weak, even ridiculous. They are simply our habits, our largely automatic responses of thought, feeling and action. Typically, we have acted wrongly before reflecting. And it is this that gives bad habits their power. For the most part they are, as Paul knew, actual characteristics of our bodies and our social context, essential parts of any human self. They do not, by and large, bother to run through our conscious mind or deliberative will, and often run exactly contrary to them. It is rare that want ro do wrong as the result of careful deliberation.
Instead our routine behavior manages to keep the deliberative will and the conscious mind off balance and on the defensive.
P 375-376