DNF 60%
I’m not sure what book the other reviewers read who are giving high ratings… seems like they were all sent free copies.
The author’s writing comes off as pretentious. At times, it’s obvious he strives to write long sentences for the sake of writing long sentences. Also, I do not care if you’re attempting to write an intelligent character, constantly quoting Shakespeare does not make them or your writing deep.
The plot is boring. We get it, your daughter died.
Every encounter with the skinheads thus far has been lackluster. The skinhead Jesse is written to be so overly dumb that he doesn’t act human. Yes, walk onto the front lawn of a skinhead crack house and start insulting the huge dude on their front porch. As long as you do it intellectually, he’ll be so confused that he’ll just stay on the front porch to be an unsolicited stranger’s verbal punching bag.
I found this description of Mercedes, the girl at the skinhead house to be juvenile: “She could be pretty if… (she) stopped smoking weed or snorting coke or whatever it is she did.” After pointing out she’s so skinny and pale she might be captive. Yes, smoking weed makes you skinny and appear deathly. You clearly described a tweaker or someone strung out on other hard drugs maybe pills, but your intellectual main character thinks she’s a pot head or coked out (even though she’s drowsy and out of it)?
Normally I don’t mind short chapters but these feel like a cop out to move from one boring scene to the next. For example: Main character goes to see crazy wife. Queue short scene where crazy wife says she saw daughter’s ghost too. No way! Scene over.
You go to your daughter’s grave and see the most unimaginative mutant creature imaginable (that is somehow mistaken for a deer or an alligator but must be a bear?). Oh, the chills when reading about the big beetle-bear with spider eyes.
Editing is bad especially for such a short book. I didn’t take note of the early errors I found because I intended to just power through the book for the sake of its shortness, but here’s one of my favorite nonsensical bits on page 88 a bit before I stopped reading:
“Walking at my side, Corbet asked what we were walking up to. ‘What I mean is what’re we about to find?’”
Huh? Redundant much? Did reading all that Shakespeare teach you to write like that?
I read over half the book and have no idea how the title “Empty Devils” has any relation at all to anything I’ve read. Also isn’t this supposed to be a horror book? Where’s the horror? The beetle-bear?
Writing is always a reflection of the author, but for the love of whatever you find holy, please keep your politics to yourself or present them in a believable/tasteful manner. At first it was subtle enough with the bad guy skinheads. But I could not continue after the Rittenhouse shooting was referenced and the race politics out of nowhere went from subtle to monumental. All done so in a manner that doesn’t even feel like it’s a true reflection of the character referencing the event but clearly just the author forcing his views on us.
“You remember that kid who shot up those protestors in Wisconsin? He was walking around with one of those ARs.”
It reads like an out of touch Reddit comment written a decade from now, and the author goes on to pepper us with race politics.
I don’t even care if the plot starts to pick up the page after I stopped reading. Whenever I begin reading fiction, my faith in the author is that their primary goal is to tell the best story they can, and I lost that faith in this instance.
As I’m finishing this review, I thumbed through and began to read the Authors Notes and Acknowledgments. Explains a lot. I didn’t need to read more than two sentences. The second is a Donald Trump quote which has been thoroughly debunked in the context used here and probably still keeps the author up at night. At least it’s the last sentence I’ll ever read from Chris DiLeo.