"Defending Alex Murdaugh" Not Guilty by Reasonable Doubt, by Crime and Cask is a deep dive into the murder trial that shocked the nation. When Paul and Maggie Murdaugh's tragic story unfolded, many were left confused as to who did it. In this book, Crime and Cask explores the major pieces of evidence against Alex Murdaugh, and questions what we thought we knew about these murders. His theories use the prosecution's timeline, evidence and testimony from the trial to present you with different results based on real-world thinking and experiments.
Crime and Cask made fans with his Murdaugh videos on TikTok. He analyzed the evidence and uncovered serious doubts about Alex Murdaugh's guilt. Each video showed flaws in the case against Alex, and the prosecution's case began to unravel with each new video.
Join Crime and Cask as he goes to Moselle to perform real-world experiments and read his inside-the-courtroom reactions. The book lets you in on his journey and his very convincing ideas about the Murdaugh case, and who really did it and why.
His popular TikTok channel has garnered attention from everyone from his loyal fans to podcasters, to Netflix, to FITSNews, the unapologetic media outlet covering news and politics in South Carolina. "Defending Alex Murdaugh" Not Guilty by Reasonable Doubt lets you explore a whole new theory about what really could have happened on June 7th, 2021.
This book will grab your attention as it makes you rethink everything you thought you knew about the confusing Murdaugh case. If you're into true crime or just want a fresh take on a real-life mystery that keeps you guessing, "Defending Alex Murdaugh" Not Guilty by Reasonable Doubt is a must-read.
Welcome to the world of Crime and Cask, the investigative journalist and best-selling author who has redefined true crime storytelling. With a fearless approach to uncovering the truth, Crime and Cask has captivated readers with deep investigative reporting and compelling narratives that challenge the boundaries of justice and perception.
Following the success of the debut book, Defending Alex Murdaugh: Not Guilty by Reasonable Doubt, and the powerful follow-up, Because Enough is Enough, Crime and Cask returns with the highly anticipated third book, Trumped Up.
The Books That Shaped the Conversation 🔍 Defending Alex Murdaugh: Not Guilty by Reasonable Doubt – A bold, evidence-based examination of one of the most infamous legal cases in recent history. Crime and Cask meticulously analyzes the trial, exposing gaps in the prosecution’s case and shedding light on reasonable doubt in the Murdaugh saga.
⚖️ Because Enough is Enough – A hard-hitting continuation of the investigation, this book digs deeper into the Murdaugh story, unveiling new layers of corruption, manipulation, and the relentless pursuit of justice. With firsthand interviews, exclusive insights, and meticulous research, Crime and Cask reveals why the truth cannot be ignored.
🔥 Trumped Up – The latest explosive release from Crime and Cask, this book shifts focus to the political and judicial battles surrounding January 6th, exposing the legal system’s double standards, media bias, and the untold stories of those caught in the storm. With an unfiltered lens on Josh Pruitt’s personal journey and the broader implications for American justice, Trumped Up is a must-read for those seeking the truth beyond the headlines.
A Voice That Challenges the Status Quo With investigative precision and a masterful storytelling style, Crime and Cask delivers gripping narratives that push the boundaries of truth, justice, and the legal system. These books are not just accounts of high-profile cases—they are deep dives into the hidden forces shaping them.
Join Crime and Cask on this fearless journey into the heart of true crime, where the facts matter, justice is questioned, and the pursuit of truth never stops.
📚 Explore the Books: ✅ Defending Alex Murdaugh: Not Guilty by Reasonable Doubt ✅ Because Enough is Enough ✅ Trumped Up
🔎 Follow Crime and Cask for the latest investigative insights, behind-the-scenes exclusives, and breaking developments in high-profile cases.
WOW! I started reading the book convinced that Alex was guilty. I had watched the trial and stayed abreast of all available information. However, after finishing this book, I am convinced of his innocence. Hopefully, the defense attorneys and Alex’s family have read and are conducting their own investigation into what has been revealed through the factual information contained in this book♥️
Excellent read for anyone following "Murdaugh Saga". Incredibly detailed, exhaustive study on what really happened that fateful June 7th night. I'm a " common sense " type of person and this book reeks of good, old common sense. Thank you, Crime & Cask! I have followed you since Day 1 on Tik Tok and you did not dissapoint!
Wow! This book really makes me think that Alex Murdaugh did not get a fair trial. SLED did a terrible investigation and never even tried to search for anyone other than Alex as the killer. They did not seal off the house. People were coming and going. Moving things. Blanca the housekeeper was washing dishes and clothes and tubs. No tire print impressions were taken from the area where Paul and Maggie were killed and there were many, many unexplained tire tracks. No DNA linking Alex to the crime scene.
Yes, Alex lied about being near the kennels that evening, but he worked with SLED closely and knew they were incompetent and he also had years of being an attorney working against him. He knew that if he placed himself in that area they would definitely put the blame on him. And he was right.
His financial crimes should not have been allowed in the trial. But the judge allowed it. The venue should have been changed so he could get a more impartial jury, but the judge denied that motion. There was just no way he would have gotten a fair trial in that county. There was deep resentment already with the boat accident.
I do believe that had his trial been moved to a different locality, away from the area he lived in and his financial crimes had not been allowed to be entered into the trial with the lack of physical evidence and the lack of any weapons he probably would not have been found guilty of the deaths of Paul and Maggie. By every single account he loved both of them very much. No one could say that they ever saw anything but love between everyone in that family.
I do think that Alex would have been tried and found guilty of stealing from his clients and his law firm and would have gone to prison for those crimes.
I just don’t feel like there was nearly enough evidence against him in the murder trial to convict, especially since it was proved that the Clerk of the Court was influencing the jury by telling them to just come to a quick conclusion and they knew he was guilty. She had also made post about a juror on FB that was not true and the juror was excused because the clerk felt like that juror would have voted No Guilty and would have caused a hung jury and an eventual mistrial. The Clerk already had a book deal in process and needed a guilty verdict for it to sell. She even went with some of the jurors to a trip to Good Morning America. She was shady and she got caught.
Alex should get a new trial. But with all the movies and books written I’m not sure if he could ever get a fair trial.
I know a lot of you are shaking your head at my review and I don’t blame you. I was a believer that Alex did it, too, but never a without a doubt believer. I always had my doubts.
Read this book and see if you don’t end up with doubts, too.
Rest in Peace Maggie and Paul. They are the only two who know the real truth. If only dogs could talk.
Dear Gussie, this was painful. The swings between superfluous, irrelevant language and plagiarized news articles left my head spinning. The author's indulgent opinion of his legal prowess and investigative skills is laughable. I want to be compensated for the time I wasted reading this nonsense. I'm glad it was a free read. I paid too much.
This is a book that should be read by anyone who followed the Alex Murdaugh saga. I ordered this from Amazon, and the binding wasn’t the greatest. Quite a few pages are not secure, which was annoying but did not impact my ability to read. I was worried if I dropped the book, without numbered pages, it would be difficult to put back together. Anyways, I really enjoyed this perspective. I’ve read Becky’s “Book” and did not enjoy how she tried to convey her beliefs as truth. This author also conveyed beliefs, but as plausible alternative theories. It’s evident that their investigation was lacking thorough examination but I hadn’t realized how poorly it was handled. And how disrespectful SLED was to the bodies and the crime scene.. that was disappointing to read, especially when an organization is there to serve and protect.. something about this case has always stuck with me. I don’t believe Alex is wholly innocent but I don’t believe he murdered his wife and youngest son. I really do hope that he gets another trial. Because even watching the trial, reading books on the matter, watching the biased Netflix documentary, I couldn’t convict him beyond reasonable doubt. I enjoyed reading this perspective, while there were some first time published errors, it was a good book. The beginning was a little too flowery for my taste, but once you get into the meat and potatoes of the trial, it was to the point.
Defending Alex Murdaugh: Not Guilty by Reasonable Doubt is a well-written and informative book that presents a compelling case for Murdaugh's innocence. Crime and Cask does an excellent job of breaking down the evidence and timeline of events, and he raises serious questions about the prosecution's case. The book is a must-read for anyone who is interested in the Murdaugh murders or in true crime in general.
However, it is important to note that the book is only one side of the story. The prosecution presented a strong case against Murdaugh, and the jury found him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. It is up to each individual reader to decide whether or not they agree with Crime and Cask's assessment of the evidence and his conclusion that Murdaugh is innocent.
This book has the courage to take on the "official media narrative" that has monetized the tragic deaths of Paul and Maggie.
I followed this case from the beginning and was very concerned about the sensational and salacious, and often inaccurate coverage, as well as the sloppiness of the police investigation and inadequacy of the prosecution's case.
This is a much needed fresh perspective, that address is a lot of the issues that I’ve been ignored, and which I have been wondering about.
Hoping for a new trial in this case. It seems warranted.
Did you not have anyone to proofread your book? Unbelievable errors in spelling and cognitive sentences.
I think your speculation as to two shooters, how they dressed, how they got to and away from the crime scene, and even how Paul looked into the killers eyes and recognized his killer??? Wow! You must have been there from beginning to end!!!
It was an interesting read, but way too much speculation in my opinion.
If you decide to write another book, please send it to me. I will gladly proofread it for you.
A must read for those That believe in the innocence of Alec Murdock.If he didn't kill them I believe he knows who did and is covering up for someone. I have my own theory as to who that might be......I hope that he gets another trial And the truth comes out......The writer did a great job Explaining All the reasons why it could not have been Alex and I completely agree with him.A very good read and highly recommend it.
I went in thinking this was going to debunk prosecutions evidence. Sadly, this is not the case. Full of 9th grade writing and imagined evidence by the author. Also, the pages of the paperback fell apart while reading.
I could only read 2 or 3 chapters. The book was written like it should have been happy, flowing love short, instead of a book about a terrible tragedy. The overuse of adjectives and adverbs was unbearable.
Good book and great information! I just don't agree with his theory but everyone has their own opinions. I would recommend to anyone interested in this case.