I really, really like this book. Manchin successfully explains what he believes and why he believes it, tying in how his experiences growing up shape how he views the world. I am impressed by the degree to which Manchin has coherent principles that he stands by whether the political winds are for or against him, and he tends to come to his conclusions out of those principles as opposed to the opinions of the crowds.
When we talk about moderation, I don’t like that it is primarily done through an electability lens. I think it should be done more through an ideological lens, as in, what is genuinely the correct position? When we talk about moderating as a form of becoming more electable, it is as if we are trying to put on an act or deceive the voting public. If you truly believe that you have the correct position, then instead of shifting your position for electability sake, you should just argue why your position is the correct one, and the audience will understand. This is why I like 'Dead Center' so much. He talks about why he believes what he believes, and he is one of the few moderate Democrats who is moderate ideologically, as in he has a fundamentally different view on what makes for quality governance than progressives, in contrast to most “moderate democrats”, who are merely progressives who care a bit more about optics and electability.
When he talks about things we take for granted such as civil disagreement, 2nd amendment, or the filibuster, it represents a type of conservatism that I’ve increasingly appreciated, which is understanding why the norms and institutions that exist in society are there. We have these things for a reason, and before you try to do something different, you should understand why they were there.
While I am somewhat anti-filibuster because I feel that voters need to feel the actions of the government that they vote in, and that giving more influence to government will make voters more inclined to pick someone who they believe will be wise with that power, disincentivizing "break the system" politicians, Manchin makes a very good case for the filibuster being a cooling saucer, and that it would be quite bad if we had a government where policies could be passed and then completely erased over 4 years, contributing to a volatile and unstable environment. I also think that bipartisanship has to exist in some capacity, and I'm not quite ready to give up hope on that just yet.
After reading this book, I have a tremendous amount of respect for the Senator, and I don't put that lightly. The sincerity by which he writes and expresses his beliefs really shows. I will continue his legacy of being fiscally responsible and socially compassionate.