Four-star read about the subtle yet intentional way Queen Elizabeth has navigated political waters in a post-imperial world. Three stars because sometimes the narrative bogs down and feels a bit repetitive; the middle third for me became a "skim," when the pattern of the content became clear after the first couple sections. Recommended for fans of the Royal Family; those interested in "soft power" leadership, as this is taking lessons from the master; and those who believe that the Queen is merely a figurehead, for they are vastly mistaken.
On paper, it is a disaster. Piece by piece, the British empire is--violently or not--shaking off the "shackles" of imperial rule in favor of independence. Queen Elizabeth, however, looked these nations in the eye, applauded their shifts toward democracy, then promptly invited them into the wisest political network, perhaps, in history--the Commonwealth. This organization of 53 nations is voluntary, providing advice, support, and unity on multitudes of issues. As Head of the Commonwealth, the queen may direct one member to another for resources, personnel, etc. Nations long to join. Member nations say things like, "We don't feel so small that we have to reject the monarchy to feel big." This crowning political achievement, I think, deserves the Nobel Peace Prize, as many of the nations in the Commonwealth might otherwise have been in competition with one another. Now they are allies. The fate of the Commonwealth when the Queen is no longer Head will be a deciding factor in global history.
Uniting 53 countries is no joke. But it came after decades of using her position as opportunity to "make points" and provide implicit endorsement of politics. As in her 1965 visit to Germany where it was said, "In Germany [and, I would argue also true all around the world], we admire the stylistic expression of grandeur. This was a great theatrical event. And Britain is the great country of the stage." While the British government is, on paper, neatly divided into legislation, run by Parliament, and diplomacy, headed by the Royal Family, the Queen's grand presence is definitely political, because it is respected. She has definite say in where and when she goes on or receives state visits, many of which have been carefully timed to build alliance and provide positive reinforcement in sticky situations. For instance, as the Soviet Union was dissolving and slowly heading toward a form of democracy, the Queen was one of the first to make an official visit, clearly endorsing this political direction of the once "Iron Curtain" section of the world. Had she not, they may easily have fallen into more controlling forms of government more suited to such a large territory.
On any given state visit, the stops made by the Queen also testify to agendas she is supporting. And these decisions are not dictated to the Queen; she is actively involved in her itineraries. So much for remaining silent and neutral. Her voice is just through actions, rather than endless words.
Quotable quotes from the book: Prince Phillip, on seeing the site where one of his ancestors was brutally massacred--"You can't condemn a whole nation for what a few extremists do or did." Regarding newspapers--"The media are seldom, if ever, in the business of helpful quotes. Their business is conflict."