What do you think?
Rate this book


Audible Audio
Published November 4, 2025

Notes on Being a Man by Scott Galloway

A well-intentioned but deeply contradictory memoir-advice hybrid that oscillates between genuinely useful counsel on male mentorship and dangerously outdated capitalist masculinity—revealing more about the author's privilege and narcissism than about sustainable paths for modern men.

Structural Identity Crisis: Notes on Being a Man suffers from fundamental genre confusion. Marketed as a guide to healthy masculinity for young men struggling in contemporary society, it functions primarily as self-aggrandizing memoir with occasional actionable advice. This packaging deception matters—readers seeking research-based guidance receive instead one privileged man's anecdotal musings elevated to universal prescription.
The structure employs short essay format organized around life stages (boyhood, adolescence, work, fatherhood), which provides readability but encourages repetition. Galloway recycles stories and maxims throughout, occasionally repeating passages and ideas. This repetition suggests either editorial failure or insufficient material to sustain book length—the work likely originated as blog posts and podcast content repurposed for commercial publication.
Central Thesis and Ideological Framework: Galloway defines masculinity through three pillars: Protect, Provide, Procreate. This hegemonic framework immediately reveals the work's limitations—reducing male identity to biological determinism and economic productivity while marginalizing alternative expressions of manhood. The framework carries implicit nationalism and remains largely heteronormative despite brief acknowledgments of broader gender expressions.
The protect-provide-procreate model resurrects mid-20th century gender essentialism without interrogating whether these roles serve men's actual wellbeing or merely reproduce patriarchal capitalism. Galloway never asks: Why must men be protectors? Whom does this framework serve? What happens to men who cannot or choose not to fulfill these roles?
The Capitalism Problem: The book's most troubling aspect involves conflating masculinity with wealth accumulation. Galloway's personal philosophy centers on "creating surplus value"—a phrase he repeats obsessively throughout the text.
Galloway’s own admissions about sacrificing health, relationships, and sanity for career advancement illustrate the extremes of his worldview. He advises readers that reaching the top 10% economically requires similar sacrifice, and suggests that prioritizing anything besides money will require accepting compromises such as living outside major global cities, driving a less expensive car, or cutting back on travel and leisure.
The text is permeated with unconscious class privilege. Galloway references country clubs, international trips, and affluent lifestyle markers as if they are universal experiences. He consistently frames financial success as both attainable through effort and essential to male identity, with little recognition of systemic inequities.
Problematic Language and Incel-Adjacent Rhetoric: Despite good intentions, the text employs terminology that echoes manosphere ideology:
The cumulative effect of this language conveys ideological assumptions Galloway may not consciously endorse, yet nonetheless normalizes through repetition.
Gender Essentialism and Relationship Advice: The book adopts a framework that positions gender differences as biological inevitabilities rather than social and cultural constructs. This essentialism undercuts Galloway’s occasional gestures toward emotional openness and progressive relational behavior.
His romantic advice centers on men “making women feel safe” and being “kind to your spouse and mate, if you have children,” framing partnership in instrumental terms tied to male self-worth, stability, and child-rearing rather than as a mutual relationship between equals.
Legitimate Strengths and Valid Insights: Despite substantial flaws, the book contributes genuine value in several areas.
Vulnerability and Emotional Honesty: Galloway’s discussion of body dysmorphia, depression, and the emotional toll of his parents’ divorce reflects notable vulnerability. His reflections on his failed first marriage and the emotional costs of overwork are among the strongest and most self-aware sections.
Maternal Recognition: Some of the book’s most meaningful moments center on Galloway’s mother, whose support helped him overcome early hardship. His childhood anecdotes—such as receiving her older car as a teenager—highlight authentic emotional grounding that shapes his worldview.
Practical Life Skills: The text offers scattered but useful advice: learn to dance, dress well, be punctual, practice kindness, invest in friendships, acknowledge privilege, and create opportunities for others. A chapter on porn addiction addresses a genuine issue affecting many young men and is presented with appropriate seriousness.
Structural Economic Critique: Galloway acknowledges systemic barriers facing young men and advocates for public investment in education, vocational training, and community institutions. He recognizes that affordable state education played a key role in his own success and argues for strengthening similar systems today.
The Missing Analysis: Despite identifying symptoms—loneliness, unemployment, lack of romantic prospects, deaths of despair—the book does not provide a deep analysis of why young men struggle. Social media and pornography are presented as major culprits, but broader structural factors remain underexamined.
The book does not seriously address:
Comparative Context: Other contemporary works—such as Richard Reeves' Of Boys and Men—provide more thorough analysis and empirical grounding. Compared to such research-driven books, Galloway’s text relies heavily on personal anecdote and a narrow ideological lens.
Target Audience Confusion: The book never clarifies its intended reader. It presents itself as guidance for young men, yet frequently centers the author’s own wealth and status. It positions itself as a parenting resource while relying on gender-essentialist assumptions and excluding LGBTQ+ perspectives. It resembles memoir, yet repeatedly shifts into prescriptive advice.
Rating: ⭐⭐✩✩✩ out of 5 stars — Occasionally insightful memoir masquerading as masculinity guide; reproduces more problems than it solves.
["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>