In Dracula and Philosophy 24 nocturnal philosophers stake out and vivisect Dracula from many angles.
John C. Altmann decides whether Dracula can really be blamed for his crimes, since it’s his nature as a vampire to behave a certain way. Robert Arp argues that Dracula’s addiction to live human blood dooms him to perpetual frustration and misery. John V. Karavitis sees Dracula as a Randian individual pitted against the Marxist collective. Greg Littmann maintains that if we disapprove of Dracula’s behavior, we ought to be vegetarians. James Edwin Mahon uses the example of Dracula to resolve nagging problems about the desirability of immortality. Adam Barkman and Michael Versteeg ponder what it would really feel like to be Dracula, and thereby shed some light on the nature of consciousness. Robert Vuckovich looks at the sexual morality of Dracula and other characters in the Dracula saga. Ariane de Waal explains that “Dragula” is scary because every time this being appears, it causes “gender trouble.” And Cari Callis demonstrates that the Count is really the Jungian Shadow archetype — with added Shapeshifter elements — in the journey of Mina Harker, heroine/victim of Stoker's novel, from silly girl to empowered woman.
Dracula and Philosophy: Dying to Know is an enthralling and provocative book that sinks its teeth into some meaty topics. Featuring 24 articles written by various authors, a number of the meanings and themes that appear in Bram Stoker’s novel, as well as several of the film adaptations, are discussed; including the nature of evil, moral agency, the nature of the mind, and subjective vs. objective experience. And for the most part they’re pretty well-written, and use some interesting techniques (such as epistolary writing) to illustrate their points. However, the articles that try to tackle more modern PC concepts that involve gender and identity politics don’t really work. Still, on the whole, Dracula and Philosophy: Dying to Know is an enjoyable read that offers some fascinating perspectives on this legendary tale.
What appears to be just a stocking stuffer collection of philosophy articles ham-fisted to fit the genre actually has a handful of interesting chapters. Much of it though feels contrived and forced to fill a bookstore shelf gap. I know these ___ and Philosophy titles are exactly that, but it was disappointing for much of the read regardless. Academic writers too, trying to write fiction, always feels like having my body slowly exsanguinated. So a somewhat painful read mildly redeemed by a handful of genuinely interesting articles?
"Vampires are psychopaths. Of course, their intelligence sets them apart from other members of the undead family. But this only means that they are highly intelligent psychopaths."