Before I get into my review, I feel like I need to give a bit of background about myself.
I'm a former Air Cadet, and I still work with my old squadron. The Air Cadet Program is a partnership between the Air Cadet League and the Department of National Defense. Many years of ground school aside, I've flown Schweitzer 2-32 and 2-33 gliders, Piper P-140 Cherokees, and Cessna C-172N models. As well, the Canadian Warplane Heritage Museum is my other home. I list all this so you can understand why I'm cranky with my review.
The author, bless her, constantly used "spin" and "spiral" interchangeably. No. Big no. They are NOT the same thing. In a spin, the aircraft is in a stalled-state, with the corkscrew maintaining its size and distance. Will a spin kill you? It can, but it'll take a while, and you'll likely be recovered long before you need to worry. A spiral, however, will kill you PDQ if you don't recover quickly. The aircraft will push, and can exceed, its Never Exceed Speed (VNE), and will disintegrate if you're really unlucky while the corkscrew tightens and your speed increases. Of the two, the spiral is more dangerous and deadly than the spin. And now you understand why they are not the same thing, and why reading her describe a spiral but call it a spin is a massive aggravation.
Next, for the love of God, stop calling these beautiful machines ships. They're planes or aircraft, not dirigibles. Referring to an amphibious aircraft as a flying boat is acceptable as it's also meant to spend time on water. A Spitfire or a Hurricane, however, is not a damn airship or an amphib, so quit referring to the aircraft as things that they're not!
Finally, this, unfortunately, makes me question just how well the author actually researched her book, along with the legitimacy of her research. On page 183, she references "High Flight," which is a sonnet of significance to every pilot. She said the writer was Canadian. Wrong. The poet, who was relegated to nothing more than a footnote at the back of the book, was Pilot Officer John Gillespie Magee Jr. He was born in Shanghai to AMERICAN parents, but flew in the RCAF during WW2. He was killed in training at 19 years old, not long after writing "High Flight". Thank you for suggesting that he's ours, however, seeing that glaringly obvious error made me wonder just how much else of this book was inaccurate or incorrect. For the record, "High Flight" is basically General Cadet Knowledge Lesson #2 (after the rank structure) for recruits. Not going to lie, I was legitimately offended by how much she disrespected P.O Magee. Read the poem. You'll understand. Also, I'm amazed she never bothered with the Airman's Grace, written by Father John MacGillvary, which is also a big deal for pilots, and is always recited at every important Mess. But she did a FUBAR to Magee, so I shouldn't be surprised that MacGillvary got the shaft.
I also noticed that the book had a ton of issues that were missed by editors. Spelling, double words, incorrect ones (such as "though" when "through" was needed). Perhaps don't cheap out on editing, and make sure the editor actually fact checks. You know, so the screwups are not only caught, but less obvious.
Overall, I'm disappointed with this book. I was so excited to read it, because of my passion for aviation, and also because my degree is in English & Military History. But seeing at least 3 massive in-your-face inaccuracies is problematic. I've given this 3 stars as a benefit-of-the-doubt grade for the depiction of the female pilots, but I'm not confident that they were portrayed accurately either. This book is probably better suited to a 2.5/5.