This review might seem a bit harsh, but that's mostly because I saw so much potential in the material and was disappointed in the execution, and/or also because of how familiar the setting is to me. I've recently thought that the GAA has been under-developed in Irish fiction. But really, we didn't get much insight into what this tells us about masculinity, male friendships, or adult pressures in this book. It was just what this character was doing at this time. I feel the book could have been written 20 years ago or 20 years from now, you would just need to exchange some surrounding details. It was difficult to see the author's stamp or style on the story, it's just telling us what it is like to have been a young person at this time in this particular place.
This lack of insight was mainly down to how the world around him wasn't developed enough. The teammates and even friends were stereotypes, assuming that you knew them and their type based on rudimentary characteristics. I found it unbelievable that he wouldn't know at least some important details about players on the senior team, presuming he actually wanted to make the team. He would have heard stories about their exploits at whatever age group he was playing with, heard or even seen their great achievements during the season. The manager and the assistant also represent key figures in the GAA and potentially the character's life. How did he not pay attention to a single team talk before Championship? This was a prime opportunity. The manager could have been a character that might have failed or struggled in life but has found a new calling in being the man to lead a team of men towards victory. Also, if you had no experience of this atmosphere before, I am not sure what these situations would teach you about the character or even about playing football, other than the details of what happens at training and what goes through your head in a game.
Maybe this book suffered from an abundance of suggestions as there was way too much to balance - moving up to the seniors, the Leaving Cert, beefs with your friends, what are you gonna do when the summer is over, but more importantly will you get into the club at the weekend, what about this girl at the hotel you work at, do you like her or not, oh your mother has sent a picture of her breasts to someone else on the island, and now the dad has left the house, the house with all the paintings of elves the mother drew by the way, the same dad that used to play senior and oh no the sister's wedding is also this summer, will the groom's sister forgive her and attend the wedding?
Perhaps due to all these competing storylines and aims of the book, the style is too unbalanced. It has identified a lucrative moment for reflection and change - the summer after the Leaving - but the moment is not interesting in and of itself, the style needs to reflect it too. He seems to capture "child" language with these concepts and nouns that we hear as children but do not question, and uses them without articles - Championship, not drinking directly from the water bottle because 'germs', no point driving because 'too near'. Or, when a joke lands describing it as an airport. However, this was overused to the point it was jarring. I think it was jarring because of how poorly it blended with the "man" language.* It felt at times like the author was trying to make clear to us that he doesn't use the words himself, so when words like "inscrutable" come along it takes you completely out of the moment because its not like the book is written from a distance. The writing is at its strongest when in the midst of an event, emotional or intense.
But these moments did not lead to any reflection afterwards that might lead us to think what the character thought of it. The actions and the change that is indicated at the end could have actually been the exact opposite and it would not have been a surprise. This takes me to my next point where there is actually no adult-like reflection on anything. He is starting to be exposed to adult events. For example, the only major interaction with the sister was one "close" conversation at the wedding, where she makes a broad statement about happiness. Even at this late stage, the character doesn't have any major reflection on anything - what he wants to do, what does he think make him happy, who does he think about when he hears this, what does he want to do right there and then. His behaviour is pretty consistently reprehensible throughout the book. Is this just saying adults are just children doing "adult" things and he will go about behaving the way he was in this book with no consequences? I don't even think the character would think that, but who knows because he never reflects on anything. Is adulthood just a series of talking about different things than when you were younger? But that wouldn't add up either because your childhood isn't just talking about the same stuff for years. We get descriptions of his actions and what he is thinking in the moment that leads to them. But afterwards, that's when the real insight should come. Let us in, John, let us in.
(As an aside, I thought he also misused the word 'sound'. I always thought of that as describing someone else as 'sound', like their whole person, but here it seemed to be used as if you could or could not be 'sound' right now depending on how you were feeling. After getting sick, his friend says 'ah, you're sound' and he replies 'I don't think I am sound actually'. Felt off to me)