As much as I love this author and the world this story takes place in, I found this particular book to be lacking. One thing I loved about the first book was its discussion on recovering from guilt and trauma. The main character felt guilt and then, on top of that, felt guilt for feeling guilty because she knew how well she had it compared to those who suffered. It discovered fears of inadequacy and choosing the wrong path. It tackled choosing the right vocation and feeling conflicted between two paths. It tackled a little bit of politics and historical events. It discussed class injustices, immigration, social outreach, illness, chastity, choice, past relationships, and forging a new path. All of this was done while maintaining a great and wonderful romance that had me genuinely hoping for the characters. Now that I have fan-girled about the first book in the series (don't get me wrong, it wasn't perfect i have some qualms, but those are for another day), its complaint time. This book, although it tackled class injustices slightly, it still felt very skimmed over. The struggle the MFC would face within these social circles just wasn't really discussed enough, in my opinion. She obviously struggles with it internally, but by the end, it's skimmed over and not really discussed with the MMC or any other cahracter. I felt like there were brief mentions of feminism and having a career and passions outside of traditional societal roles, but then it immediately changed the topic. In my opinion, a man who has grown up being taught that women stay at home and men get to be in charge is not going to change his mind after one conversation that didn't even directly call him out. The character was rarely super introspective about his semi toxic masculinity or the role his wealth would play in their relationship, but would randomly be like, 'You know what. I was wrong. My bad guys, let me just real quick change my entire perspective because I have very few values set in stone. ' I understand wanting to start a story with a character who didn't nessassrilly see his wealth, his nepotism, his power over his employees, or his general role as a man within a patriarchal society. I understand that its not marketable to have a character who fights these ideas at first, but it's realistic, and I wish the author had explored this more. It would have been amazing to see a friend, family member, or even the love interest slowly convince him of the complexity of class structure and of women in general. My third complaint is that his family is won over too quickly. The MMC's mother goes from basically believing she is an insignificant pest that has seduced her son too, supporting their marriage. There is a plot point being formed for much of the book displaying the opposition his mother has towards the FMC, but when we finally come to have the conflict the mother makes a 180 in 2 seconds flat. Whats worse is we spend time convincing the father who has shown almost no qualms with the FMC (mostly because he wasn't really there), but as soon as the father agrees the mother just doesn't have opinions beyond gracious agreeing ones. Even worse than this is that in the previous two books, the mother is rarely shown as a servant hating, class elitist. Like why even make her a hater all of a sudden, if you were just going to carve away her opinion as soon as the male character (her husband) hops on board. My next complaint is about historical setting. So often discussion of a bad cholera outbreak is brought up, but we dont see any real consequences our characters face, other then certain family members from previous books being absent (which if I'm being honest felt like lazy writing). The only time cholera effects them is when it fits into the greater story, such as when it negatively effects the city's economy and purchasing power. Much of the historical conflict that was occurring in St. Louis, Missouri, in 1849, was gone in this book, and it left the pages feeling empty. If you are going to set our world up so that it is full of converging events in the first two books, why not progress, elaborate, or at least utilize them to better the world. The fire in 1849 thay destroyed much of St. Louis is such a good event to continue this plot line from, but it felt so lacking. I understand that our main character is going to take advantage of the situation, but I never felt like we ever truly discussed the loss or recovery the city was facing. At every turn, people were just gone because of the cholera outbreak and therefore not dealing with the fire. But let's be real here, ONLY THE RICH CAN DO THIS. I understand that we are dealing with an MMC of wealth, and that's his world, but our FMC isn't. You are telling me she formed no friendships or relationships outside of the MMC and his family (besides her brother, but he is literally a man to). You are telling me she did not make a single friend while living in the slums. She doesn't make friends with staff at both her previous and current place of work. It makes her feel so one-dimensional and male centered. I really hate to be that person who is complaining because of a book not being feminist enough, but in this case, it actually felt so severely harmful to the story and the characters I loved. A woman in her case who has survived so much is not going to be this weak. I don't like that she is simultaneously portrayed as vulnerable, but then it's also ok for him to be almost taking advantage of that vulnerability. So much of the time, he was worried about taking advantage of her, so I was slightly unfair, but I still find something wrong with the evolution of their relationships in some cases. So much more of the FMC's character could have been flushed out. We could have discussed how she came back to her faith. How she lost hope in God but regained it even in times of more distress. The weirdest thing was thatvwe knew she had walked away form Faith and came back, however within the book she still deeply struggles with resentment towards God. I think that is something peoppe in the process of converting their heart back to God could relate to. I wish we had been able to understand her relationship and resentmetn towards the Lord just a little more. My last complaint is again about character development. The MMC should have taken longer to change his mind on certain issues. He should have been able to explore the negative behaviors caused by pressure from his father. So often, we see him compare and compete in his mind with his father, but we don't see his actual healing. We do have a moment where he says 'wow maybe I dont need to be in competition with him', but we never see that gradual understanding of the toxicity of the way he views success. If I'm being frank, I wish about 100 pages were cut from the book and just replaced. It's not that there were lulls while reading because I read this is a day. It's more that there were times when I could see what was trying to be conveyed, but I didn't feel it. So many important themes were mentioned in this book, and it they had been able to shine just a little more. I think this book could have been just as good as the first one. I love Jody Hedlund as an author. I loved her orphan train series, and I loved the first two books of this series and I want to see more from this one, but this book had potential that just wasn't used.