Henry Louis Gates Jr. hailed Sven Beckert's Capitalism: A Global History as "certain to become a canonical work of history" and I can think of no better way to introduce my sentiments than that: this book is canonical. He gets right down to the brass tax of the book pretty quickly, articulating a clear set of questions that he answers in over 1000 pages afterwards: "How did the capitalist revolution begin? How did a form of economic life that was such a breakaway from previous history spread around the world and into more spheres of life? How did we move from a society in which markets were embedded in social relations to one in which social relations are embedded in markets? By what mechanism has capitalism evolved and changed over time? And where are we in its history today?". If those aren't your questions, this probably isn't the book for you; Thankfully though, they apply to a number of disciplines and inquiries.
It is impossible to tell the story of capitalism without Europe. Not because of a superiority of application or conception, but on the basis of the sheer volume of violent dispossession and enslavement used to create a hierarchy upon which Europe claimed the top spot for itself. Beckert says the quiet part rather loud: Europe was capitalism's market-focused engine whose motto became marketization or bust. Unfortunately we are living in the "busted" remains. Industries in British, Portuguese, French, and Dutch colonies are the economies affected by the remains, where they did not have the same opportunity as Europe, to develop industries on their own terms. Beckert writes about their present commodities as a reflection of past development that refused anything other than what served European interests and barons thereof. Would textiles, coal, diamonds, coffee, sugar, rum, gas, and other cornerstone industries be a GDP priority or dominate a country's trade if "Western"/Global North countries did not foist them upon colonized subjects? The West owes everything it has to the uneven way the world was developed under capitalism through enslavement, largely of Black and Brown people, and subsequent plantation logics intermingled with Fordist and Taylorist productivity and efficiency narratives that still dominate today's wage labours. I learned that the Consolidated Association of the Planters of Louisiana (CAPL) mortgaged enslaved people to securitize them and that "in 1828, the British merchant bank Baring Brothers bought $1.67 million of CAPL bonds to resell on European securities markets" (p.391). In other words, despite countries outlawing slavery, the generational wealth of aristocratic families across colonizing countries was consolidated through mortgaging enslaved people in the United States. Beckert reviews far more history than this and with greater detail than I could summarize here. I could not ignore the centrality of slavery to modern capitalism and the wealth that allows one to participate in politics which shapes policies and social relations for even more generations. It will be impossible to read this book and misunderstand what someone means when they say that the world as we know it was built by enslaved people in the United States. It will be equally impossible to read this book and wonder how reparations are a subject of debate rather than a de facto step to repairing historical harms (not something Beckert talks about as such, but there is ample research to demonstrate exploitation that in my opinion, necessitates reparations).
Capitalism departs from similar authoritative delineations by emphasizing that it is an object of human creation; Over and over again for the cheap seats in the back. Beckert writes a historical introduction to capitalism and an accordant prologue to the uneven development that characterizes globalization narratives today. Additionally, he shows (with an admittedly enviable discursive ease), the mechanisms of capitalism that, in other treatments I've read, were never as clear as in his book. Readers will understand the necessity of the state and how the notion of the wealthiest 1% is not a new economic production, but a feature of capitalism that was present in the 1600s through to the 1800s. Capitalism cannot survive if not suctioned to the state vis-a-vis policies and politics protecting the structural interests and subsequent financial interests of its arbiters that allow it to live another day. The only surprise was how relevant this history was to describing where we are in 2026, where the next few decades will likely replicate disordered social relations strewn through emergent means of production (enshittification, and technofeudalism, anyone?) like badly rolled dice across the gameboard of human history. As we try to belch away the remains of capitalist indigestion in social relations, Beckert offers compelling reason to believe that there will likely be uprisings and protests similar to the ones capitalism wrought upon shifts from pastoral to cosmopolitan landscapes. In short, despite the protests characterizing the past decade, we probably "ain't seen nothing yet". It was a relief in a way, to understand that the dumpster fire vibe of the world today isn't new, nor does it make anyone special for sussing it out. The book is an indispensable volume for everyone, but it is especially illuminating and ideological momentum building for those with left-leaning political sentiments. Some folks on the right or those inclined towards capitalism's privileges may argue that it sifts through history, though I would argue that the book excavated it with an unparalleled depth of research.
In the introduction (which, if you only read one chapter of this book, I would recommend it be that one) Beckert writes that "We are not just subjects of capitalism; we are its architects". It is the enduring gift of this book for readers. His book is a necessary reminder that capitalism is a concept different from that of a singular economy. By writing such a richly detailed history he shows readers that as the rivers of time ebb, crest, and flow, capitalism is neither the river or the boat. It's just a steep riverbank we've stopped at in the long arc of human history. In other words, he breathes a little more life into the imaginary of alternatives with this incredible work. Where the meme-friendly sentiment of overthrowing capitalism gets tossed around as a joke, Beckert writes a quiet hope into the numbing effect of modernity. Disentanglement from the "God trick" of the history of capitalism is, I think, one of the best features of the book. Despite what devout capitalists tell you as they place their faith in the altars of production and accumulation, in the beginning there was not capitalism. And there was light before capitalism or its beneficiaries declared it be on.
To read Sven Beckert's book will no doubt be a significant investment of your time. At 1087 pages of book, and about 200 pages of endnotes, it is what Gen Z might call "thicc". For those seeking a comprehensive and truly global history of capitalism, it is worth every minute of your attention. Capitalism will be the definitive volume on its titular subject for at least a decade and perhaps an era, eclipsing the efforts of his genre forebears. Where Adam Smith wrote Wealth of Nations advocating for an ideological capitalism, Capitalism provides a substantial history of its implementation and logic sufficient to give readers grist for the critical thinking mill that asks whether there is no better alternative. It is a good thing I enjoy endurance sports because reading this book was the ultramarathon of book geekery. I would highly recommend this book!