The author made this book available for free for a weekend, and because it was on my read list I picked up. Thank you for that.
It's a first time effort, and I'm afraid to say: it shows. The title claims it is a romantic crime novel, but I'll get to that later.
The mystery in itself is quite interesting, and while it was obvious who was behind it early, there were enough red herrings to throw the reader off a few times. It is, in fact quite a page-turner.
The setting is Brisbane, Australia and we're introduced to Phoebe, who is waking up from a quite erotic and puzzling dream she has for a while now. Although she is married, she dreams of a beautiful woman who she has never met before. Imagine the shock when she finally meets this mystery woman. Unbeknownst to Phoebe, that woman, Charlie Moss is the attorney for Phoebe's husband, who wants a divorce. But he has a secret and isn't to forthcoming with details regarding their nuptials. And then Phoebe gets attacked and the mystery takes off.
The big problem this book has, is the writing. The investigation is handled by both the police and Charlie's assistant, but they are not working together. There is a lot of headhopping in the chapters. The POV changes rapidly, sometimes up to six different characters at a time. I don't know about the rest of you, but I found that both tiring and annoying. When Amanda (Charlies assistant) discovers someting or does something, the POV changes to someone else.
The other thing that happens constantly is the use of what is called "dangling participles". Participles are verbs ending in –ing (present participle) or—except for irregular verbs—in –ed (past participle) and functioning as adjectives. Since they are verbs, they describe actions or state of beings, and since they function as adjectives, they modify nouns. (quoted from Jae's writing tips website).
An example is: Looking out the window, she fidgetted with the hem of her shirt. Sometimes this is OK, but a lot of times it leads to some very awkward phrasing. Examples from the book:
Entering her office, she sat her her desk and started eating as she read her next brief or my favorite:
Heading back to Charlie's car, she drove back up to gym and found a parking spot across the road
That last sentence doesn't make any sense at all. And there are dozens and dozens of these sentences.
Now back to the title. The actual romance, doesn't start until the very last chapter. Thing is, I understand what the author tried to do. There is a major conflict of interest here (after all, Charlie is the attorney of Phoebe's husband). But let's start with the dream Phoebe wakes up from on page one. Phoebe has never seen Charlie before, yet Phoebe finds out she's real. What are the odds of that? And while the first meeting ends in disaster (Phoebe actually faints), the second is a brief as the first, but much sparks fly and some hot kissing and a displacement of a bra occurs. That would have been fine, were it not for Phoebe's mental struggles with the fact she has the hots for a woman, so much so, she seeks councelling. Yet, at the first oppurtunity, she has no qualms undressing the woman of her dreams.
Phoebe and Charlie meet for a grand total of three times before the crime is solved. From what I can tell, that amounts to about 25 minutes of face-to-face contact in real time. And both women are that head over heels for eachother they can't even function properly anymore in their respective jobs.
In fact, Charlie has so little screentime, we don't even really get to know her. Most of the book deals with the investigation undertaken by Amanda and the assigned detectives. Contact with Charlie takes place by phone or texting or e-mail. And then when Phoebe gets in real trouble, Charlie starts dreaming too, and wouldn't ya know, she dreams of the exact circumstances Phoebe is in. WTF?
Were it not for a decent mystery and investigation (no matter how fragmented it is described) I don't think I would have finished it. The romance is non-existent and what there is of it, is not really believable. The investigation borders sometimes on the comical side, with the cops always a step behind and the squad leader (I'm sorry, I can't really recall the Australian name for it.) is as rude as hell with namecalling and cursing and what not. Is that an Australian motivation technique?