Here, philosophers wittily and expertly uncover amazing philosophical insights from the endlessly fascinating TV show, It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia .
Greg Littmann shows how the values of the gang are the same as those of Homeric heroes. Christopher Ketcham argues that the Church should make Charlie a saint, partly because It’s Always Sunny is “all about free will.” Russ Hamer shows how closely the gang’s activities comply with the scientific method. Kyle Alkema and Adam Barkman analyze the way the gang perceives happiness and how they try to get it. Charlotte Knowles considers whether Heidegger would consider members of the gang authentic or inauthentic — and concludes that they’re a bit of both. Skyler King examines the morality of the gang’s behavior by the standard of how they respond to extreme suffering. Ethan Chambers agrees that each of the five central characters is a terrible person, but argues that they are not truly to blame for their actions. Fenner Tanswell demonstrates that many of the gang’s wrong actions result not from immoral motives but from illogical thinking. And Robert Arp compiles a hilarious list of historical examples where people acted even more foolishly than the Philadelphia Five.
Never thought I'd read something with Its Always Sunny and Philosophy in the title, but it works! Interesting pop culture comparisons using Greek, Roman, Renaissance, Enlightenment, etc sources. I am not a huge fan of the show so I had not seen some of the episodes referenced, if I did I think it would be more like a 4 or even 5 stars. I just picked this up and glad I did. Now I definitely want to binge watch a few episodes before the characters make me hate mankind too much to continue.
could have been a lot more in depth, especially when it comes to charlie's psychology. i did enjoy this, but it bothered me when they spelled dee (deandra) wrong. i don't feel like these people are real sunny fans, you feel me?
Unfocused which I guess fits considering this is a book examining the erratic and often dangerous behavior of The Gang, but not only is it simply littered with typos, but many chapters are content to just recap the stories of episodes of the show (and more often than not the same episode has been covered in another chapter), and occasionally they’ll preach to the reader.
A couple of the essays are okay, but I didn’t really need a whole chapter that’s Frederick nietzsche recounting “the gang solves the gas crisis” as a conversation between the philosopher and the gang. I’d hardly call this book essential reading, even if you’re a fan of the show.
Features interesting bits of knowledge from history, as well as pop-philosophical treatises. The analysis of the Gang’s behavior was funny, though it could be more in-depth.