I sat on this one for a few days, and I really wanted to like it... I love Girl, Wash Your Face and Party Girl truly was both wholesome and hilarious.
But the underlying conflict of The Girls book 2 makes my skin crawl. I support people who believe that live begins at conception, who therefore feel that all of /their/ pregnancies should be accepted. But fiction involving teen pregnancy (and arguably rape??) that doesn't even acknowledge choices as a topic is both outdated and shaming. Taking a stand on one side of the life/choice debate, whatever it is, is good. But bringing up the topic without acknowledging both sides is irresponsible... Even in fictions...especially In YA for young women. It's a deeply personal topic that shouldn't be skimmed over for the sake of making a character broken and in need of fixing. And back to the pseudo rape situation... I am really, really disappointed by Hollis's portrayal of a young woman who survived both a medically/alcohol induced college party rape and a miscarriage. as an author, she may not have supported the flawed amount of shame that her character felt after /blacking out, having sex with (being raped by) a stranger, getting pregnant, and then miscarrying,/ but she also never took real time to let the character (or her young female readers) realize that the shame wasn't hers to carry.
In short, Hollis could have picked any number of traumatic experiences that would create a flawed character with dark and stormy personality features to work through while falling in love. She chose something that is a big deal for many young women and she didn't give it the narrative young women deserve. The topic isn't light or easy to digest, and maybe it didn't belong in this type of book... but then it shouldn't have been the undercurrent of Max's story at all. The "lessons" she learned at the end were real ones for young and driven women to relate to, but the trauma Hollis chose does not line up.