I'm interested to see the film, but the book can sometimes be a bit dull. "Brutally honest" it is, but Obree never spends enough time on his downfalls to make his successes seem like real victories. He never loses - or at least never seems to be truly put off by a result. True, it implies that cycling was his "way out" but I read this book for the hardships of a professional athlete and I got a record of how much money he earned winning countless races. It came too easily; 007 has to get debilitatingly injured before he pushes through the pain to help M.
Maybe it's unfair to compare "The Flying Scotsman" to "Boys in the Boat" (or James Bond), but seeing as Daniel James Brown's has captured the zeitgeist of modern sports books, I think it is only right to do so. The "Boys" characters lose, they struggle and so they train even harder. Obree admittedly is battling a psychological disorder - manic depression (and being married and gay but the book does not cover this). But his way out is to casually go and be the favorite to win at large events, or go cycling across the countryside. No physical hardship.
As I said, considering the advertisement on the front of my copy showing "now a major film" I am interested to see what Mackinnon has done. Looking back at my review though, I'm not sure exactly why his lack of physical hardship bothered me, but it just didn't rope me in, not from a sports biography standpoint at least.