What do you think?
Rate this book
Questions 27 & 28
In February 1942, shortly after the bombing of Pearl Harbor, Franklin D. Roosevelt issued an executive order authorizing the secretary of war to remove 120,000 Japanese Americans from their homes on the West Coast and corral them into inland concentration camps. To be considered for release, they were required to answer the so-called loyalty questionnaire. Question 27 asked the inmates—who had been imprisoned without cause by the US military—whether they were willing to serve in combat for the US military. Question 28 asked them—many of whom American citizens who had never visited Japan—to renounce allegiance to the Japanese emperor. Answering these questions caused volatile divisions within the camps, tore families and friends apart, and had lasting repercussions in the decades postwar.
Questions 27 & 28 reaches backward and forward from the time of the questionnaire, chronicling the individuals who arrived in the US from Japan at the turn of the century, their children who came of age during war and incarceration, and their descendants who lived in its aftermath. Yamashita mixes fact with fiction and layers genres from James Bond movies to haiku to oral history, transfiguring an enormity of archival research into a chorus of stories. With her signature wit and aplomb, she gives voice to laborers, artists, scholars, informants, and activists who, over three generations, defined an immigrant community.
Questions 27 & 28 reaches backward and forward from the time of the questionnaire, chronicling the individuals who arrived in the US from Japan at the turn of the century, their children who came of age during war and incarceration, and their descendants who lived in its aftermath. Yamashita mixes fact with fiction and layers genres from James Bond movies to haiku to oral history, transfiguring an enormity of archival research into a chorus of stories. With her signature wit and aplomb, she gives voice to laborers, artists, scholars, informants, and activists who, over three generations, defined an immigrant community.
600 pages, Kindle Edition
First published April 28, 2026
About the author
Karen Tei Yamashita
26 books233 followersBorn January 8, 1951 in Oakland, California, Karen Tei Yamashita is a Japanese American writer and Associate Professor of Literature at University of California, Santa Cruz, where she teaches creative writing and Asian American literature. Her works, several of which contain elements of magic realism, include novels I Hotel (2010), Circle K Cycles (2001), Tropic of Orange (1997), Brazil-Maru (1992), and Through the Arc of the Rain Forest (1990). Tei Yamashita's novels emphasize the absolute necessity of polyglot, multicultural communities in an increasingly globalized age, even as they destabilize orthodox notions of borders and national/ethnic identity.
She has also written a number of plays, including Hannah Kusoh, Noh Bozos and O-Men which was produced by the Asian American theatre group, East West Players.
Yamashita is a finalist for the 2010 National Book Award for I Hotel.
She has also written a number of plays, including Hannah Kusoh, Noh Bozos and O-Men which was produced by the Asian American theatre group, East West Players.
Yamashita is a finalist for the 2010 National Book Award for I Hotel.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 53 reviews
March 31, 2026
⭐️⭐️⭐️ 3/5. TY Graywolf Press for the gifted copy!
The most layered “novel” I’ve read in recent years, and maybe ever? Reading this is like taking an entire semester course on the history of Japanese immigration to America. There are a lot of voices, a lot of themes, and a lot to unpack. I enjoyed enjoying playing detective and piecing it all together, but ultimately I would have appreciated more explanation. There are a lot of really amazing ideas here but they never all came together into a “novel” which is what it calls itself!
The most layered “novel” I’ve read in recent years, and maybe ever? Reading this is like taking an entire semester course on the history of Japanese immigration to America. There are a lot of voices, a lot of themes, and a lot to unpack. I enjoyed enjoying playing detective and piecing it all together, but ultimately I would have appreciated more explanation. There are a lot of really amazing ideas here but they never all came together into a “novel” which is what it calls itself!
December 21, 2025
Award quality. Questions 27 & 28 has a precise title but the narrative sprawls from before the Meiji restoration through the twentieth and across the pacific and national borders. The first section feels a bit overwhelming because it introduces many characters and is told in several narrative styles. There is no one voice in the novel as different migration stories are introduced and it felt like an arid, unwelcoming, and over complicated start for a reader. I enjoyed the pancho villa story but thought wtf are we in Mexico? Yet it’s structurally brilliant for obvious reasons. The next section of narratives starts with a pre-wwii mock naval battle by Japanese and American children (one of my favorites and is more traditional vignette that remixes the emotional tone). The angst increases with each story.
Blame for America’s concentration camps is placed in fear, ignorance, and distrust. In one of my favorite scenes, a young, confined mother talks with a young white social worker and we see a rare POV switch to those in power. She’s aware of the immediate problems and presented as well intentioned: “The lady doesn’t know Rosalie’s on her side. What side is that? She’ll have to find out. Rosalie scuffs the sandy soil under her boots and tries to decide on the correct attitude that will give her access to the room inside. Coyness might work with a man, but this woman will see through her ploy. A mixture of ingratiating stupidity requesting proper instruction, this might work.” To a degree, this helps mitigate history, but this frame of mind induces panic; this is the same way people might feel in the present. As we all know, Korematsu is still good law.
A timely novel that is formally bold and sensitive to the diversity of origin stories and experiences as well as the commonalities and structural ties between people.
Blame for America’s concentration camps is placed in fear, ignorance, and distrust. In one of my favorite scenes, a young, confined mother talks with a young white social worker and we see a rare POV switch to those in power. She’s aware of the immediate problems and presented as well intentioned: “The lady doesn’t know Rosalie’s on her side. What side is that? She’ll have to find out. Rosalie scuffs the sandy soil under her boots and tries to decide on the correct attitude that will give her access to the room inside. Coyness might work with a man, but this woman will see through her ploy. A mixture of ingratiating stupidity requesting proper instruction, this might work.” To a degree, this helps mitigate history, but this frame of mind induces panic; this is the same way people might feel in the present. As we all know, Korematsu is still good law.
A timely novel that is formally bold and sensitive to the diversity of origin stories and experiences as well as the commonalities and structural ties between people.
May 17, 2026
This was the most non-fiction like fiction novel I have ever read, and I wanted so badly to like it. It covers such an important and shameful and still too unknown subject from American history that is tragically still extremely relevant to this day, and it does it in a really unique way. Unfortunately, I think I would have preferred if this had been a straightforward nonfiction book. The fiction elements, for me, muddied the water, even when I enjoyed them. Like, I had fun in the James Bond type sequence, but I still have no idea what was going on during it. I also noted that you get about halfway through the book before you are ever told what Questions 27 and 28 were, so unless you had preexisting historical knowledge or had read the back cover, you would just be really, really lost. This is one of those books that I think would be better taught in a history class than an English class, as there is no hand-holding or exposition given about the historical context and the book assumes you already know quite a bit, or that you have an impressive talent for names and dates. I think this book would better serve as a companion to other informational texts about this subject, rather than an introduction/overview of the subject itself. This is an important topic to be informed about, so I’m grateful for what new information I was able to glean from this, but I would direct other learners to other resources first.
May 22, 2026
"Questions 27 and 28"was an interesting read, but it took me a while to realize it's a work of fiction. The chapters are structured like firsthand accounts connected to the Japanese internment experience. The shifting narratives and confusing timeline made the book hard to follow, and I found myself skimming some sections simply because they did not make much sense to me.
My favorites "stories" were “Richard X,” “Michi: Infamy,” “Yuki: Rashomon,” and “Harry: Enryo Syndrome.” “Richard X” was especially powerful because fragments of the Loyalty Questionnaire are woven throughout the story, serving as a constant reminder of how something as simple as a bureaucratic form could determine a person’s future. “Harry” also stood out because it pushes readers to think about race as a social construct and how quickly fear can turn an entire group into scapegoats.
What really resonated with me was the sheer injustice Japanese Americans faced. Families came to America chasing opportunity, only to encounter discrimination long before internment, including laws preventing them from owning land or becoming citizens. Reading about people born in the U.S., who had only ever known America as home and had never even stepped foot in Japan, yet were still viewed as outsiders or enemies, was especially heartbreaking. That level of cruelty and racism is revolting. During wartime, Japanese culture itself became so closely tied to Japanese nationalism that even preserving language or cultural identity became suspicious. Some parents taught their children Japanese because they feared they would be sent to a country the children had never known, yet doing so risked making them look even more suspicious.
"Questions 27&28" shows how oppression can be legalized when leaders decide they have the right to strip a group of people of their rights under the guise of military necessity. The plan was not simply to monitor Japanese Americans, it was mass evacuation from California’s coastal areas into isolated interior camps, with forced relocation and labor. American citizens were denied habeas corpus and basic constitutional protections. The Loyalty Questionnaire, specifically Questions 27 and 28, created an impossible situation. Many of the people expected to respond could not even read English fluently, yet their answers determined their fate. A “no-no” response labeled someone as disloyal and could result in transfer to segregated prisons. The questionnaire also created deep suspicion within the camps themselves, forcing people to question whom they could trust. One of the most disturbing parts of this book was learning that some Japanese Americans renounced their citizenship and, in doing so, became stateless. Congress renounced their citizenship in 1945, so they were rejected by their own country and told they belonged to another country that was not theirs. The idea that the American government essentially caused the Japanese Americans to become stateless is disgusting.
One part of the book I had never really considered was the impact on Native communities, since some internment camps were built on Indigenous land. Communities that had already endured generations of displacement and stolen land were expected to absorb yet another forcibly displaced population. That perspective is rarely discussed, and I appreciated the book for bringing attention to it. While I did not necessarily enjoy the fragmented structure of this book, the historical themes and moral questions it raises made it worthwhile. More than anything, it reminded me of how dangerous fear, racism, and political power becomes when leaders decide they have the authority to target an entire group of innocent people.
My favorites "stories" were “Richard X,” “Michi: Infamy,” “Yuki: Rashomon,” and “Harry: Enryo Syndrome.” “Richard X” was especially powerful because fragments of the Loyalty Questionnaire are woven throughout the story, serving as a constant reminder of how something as simple as a bureaucratic form could determine a person’s future. “Harry” also stood out because it pushes readers to think about race as a social construct and how quickly fear can turn an entire group into scapegoats.
What really resonated with me was the sheer injustice Japanese Americans faced. Families came to America chasing opportunity, only to encounter discrimination long before internment, including laws preventing them from owning land or becoming citizens. Reading about people born in the U.S., who had only ever known America as home and had never even stepped foot in Japan, yet were still viewed as outsiders or enemies, was especially heartbreaking. That level of cruelty and racism is revolting. During wartime, Japanese culture itself became so closely tied to Japanese nationalism that even preserving language or cultural identity became suspicious. Some parents taught their children Japanese because they feared they would be sent to a country the children had never known, yet doing so risked making them look even more suspicious.
"Questions 27&28" shows how oppression can be legalized when leaders decide they have the right to strip a group of people of their rights under the guise of military necessity. The plan was not simply to monitor Japanese Americans, it was mass evacuation from California’s coastal areas into isolated interior camps, with forced relocation and labor. American citizens were denied habeas corpus and basic constitutional protections. The Loyalty Questionnaire, specifically Questions 27 and 28, created an impossible situation. Many of the people expected to respond could not even read English fluently, yet their answers determined their fate. A “no-no” response labeled someone as disloyal and could result in transfer to segregated prisons. The questionnaire also created deep suspicion within the camps themselves, forcing people to question whom they could trust. One of the most disturbing parts of this book was learning that some Japanese Americans renounced their citizenship and, in doing so, became stateless. Congress renounced their citizenship in 1945, so they were rejected by their own country and told they belonged to another country that was not theirs. The idea that the American government essentially caused the Japanese Americans to become stateless is disgusting.
One part of the book I had never really considered was the impact on Native communities, since some internment camps were built on Indigenous land. Communities that had already endured generations of displacement and stolen land were expected to absorb yet another forcibly displaced population. That perspective is rarely discussed, and I appreciated the book for bringing attention to it. While I did not necessarily enjoy the fragmented structure of this book, the historical themes and moral questions it raises made it worthwhile. More than anything, it reminded me of how dangerous fear, racism, and political power becomes when leaders decide they have the authority to target an entire group of innocent people.
May 21, 2026
While I am glad I read this book, and parts were enlightening for me, I found much of it difficult to follow. I believe I needed more context surrounding the material in the book (mostly written from the perspective of individuals of Japanese heritage who were relocated to camps in America). The organization of the material and the varied stories did not help me to follow what was happening as each new story began. I did learn a great deal, and the accounts of the people involved were gut wrenching. I now understand more about the terrible circumstances, how lives were ruined, and the long-term ramifications of the relocations. But, the book was more confusing due to the chronological order of the stories (with some later research into the background presented near the end). Perhaps if I were more knowledgeable before reading this book of the history, timelines, and vocabulary of this horrible period in the U.S., I’d have gotten more out of it or have found it easier to follow. I don’t recommend reading this book before reading something else that provides more details and context on this subject, which this book often didn’t provide.
June 16, 2026
went back and forth between 3 and 4 stars on this, it was a very interesting narrative style and incorporated a lot of historical documents which was very cool but I fear I just didn't like how some of the chapters were structured, it made jt hard to follow/track what was actually going on. I did still learn a lot about the internment camps but I feel like there was even more I didn't learn
September 14, 2026
I'm glad I read this book, because I think the subject matter is important, but I found it difficult to engage with. It is a mix of fiction and non-fiction, documenting the internment of Japanese Americans during WWII and the long-term effects, combining historical documents/archives along with fictionalized, first person narratives of people in and out of the camps. The author covers a wide range of viewpoints, with chapters from the perspective of pro-Japanese prisoners, sociologists researching life in the camps, and those who fully support the U.S. (the "yes-yes" boys vs. the "no-nos" on 2 questions re: loyalty to the U.S.). Although I'm very interested in the subject matter, at times I found it hard to follow since the book does not follow a linear narrative, and it was hard to keep track of all the characters/historical figures, whose stories were referenced throughout the book (for example, there would be one story about something that happened in a camp, and many chapters later there would be another story about that person's life after being released). The most engaging sections were the longer interludes of life in the camps, told through first person narratives. I guess I was looking for more of those personal stories, since I have already read some non-fiction on the subject. I definitely recommend reading some history before diving into this book, since you would probably be even more confused if you don't know anything about internment. The history of the long-running court cases and efforts to restore full citizenship to many of the prisoners who had renounced their U.S. citizenship under duress was fascinating, and heartbreaking that it took so long for any kind of justice to be served. A very original take on an important part of our history.
September 19, 2026
An ethnography slash collection of loosely linked vignettes of 20th century Japanese American life, this work is occasionally interesting, even brilliant, but more often tedious. The best stories cluster near the beginning, then become fewer and further apart. It's exhausting.
If you are interested in questions 27 and 28 and haven't yet read No-No Boy, read that first, or instead.
If you are interested in questions 27 and 28 and haven't yet read No-No Boy, read that first, or instead.
August 21, 2026
This “novel” won’t be for everyone. Yamashita does away with any semblance of a linear plot, incorporates all sorts of historical documents and resources (there are footnotes galore and an extensive bibliography), includes only a few fictional characters and dozens of real people (with very little information or explanation of who they are), and plays around with many different narrative styles and forms. I think most readers without some prior understanding or knowledge of the history of the Japanese in the U.S. and especially of the World War II-era internment will be lost, at least initially. Nonetheless, I found this to be absolutely fascinating and compelling (as history and as a literary work), both intellectually and emotionally powerful, and as timely and relevant as today’s news. For those who think “it can’t happen here,” it can and it did, and there are too many in this country who desire it and would allow it to happen again.
June 13, 2026
This almost became one of my few Did Not Finish books. It does not read as a novel; I found it hard to make connections, as few concrete clues were given to guide the reader through very disparate entries. However, it did serve as a source of information about a dark blotch on United States history.
At the risk of revealing my ignorance, can anyone explain the question at the end of the book? What is the codified meaning of the last five digits of the WRA database? The only thing I’ve come up with is that it is a date. Or, has AI suggested, to reveal the inhumanity of reducing a person to a mere number?
At the risk of revealing my ignorance, can anyone explain the question at the end of the book? What is the codified meaning of the last five digits of the WRA database? The only thing I’ve come up with is that it is a date. Or, has AI suggested, to reveal the inhumanity of reducing a person to a mere number?
September 10, 2026
I had to go back and reread a few of the sections in order to truly understand what was going on. Yamashita adds references on top of references that someone without a deep historical understanding of not only the internment camps but also the academic writings and literature about them would find difficult to follow. I picked up the indirect mentions of Isamu Noguchi and Toshio Mori in "Becoming Nisei" and Mine Okubo in "Citizen".
Salvage and spoilage are books that came out of the JERS study from UC Berkeley (the researchers make their own appearances in the book), referring to those who were resettled early to the east coast and those were imprisoned at Tule Lake, respectively. Accordingly, the sections of Questions 27 & 28 focus on these groups in that order. Residue was an unpublished third book meant to cover the experiences of those who stayed in the camps and mostly went back to the west coast.
Yamashita covers lots of cool historical documents and testimonies in the book. For example, Wayne Collins, an attorney who worked to restore citizenship to the renunciants (mentioned when I visited Bainbridge island recently), has his story told through actual letters sent between him and his clients. He also takes a position a la Jay Caspian Kang towards the JACL, accusing them of using cooperation with internment as a way to bolster their own social reputations. I also learned about the fair play committee and the hoshi dan, two resistance organizations from Heart Mountain and Tule Lake, which took two very different approaches to the two questions: resistance by appealing to the social contract of the US constitution and reclamation of a Japanese patriotic identity.
I was also inspired by the narrative of Aiko Herzig-Yoshinaga and the importance of historical research: it was through her work that the redress movement was able to uncover the suppression of evidence for the military necessity of internment and build towards the overturning of Korematsu, Hirabayashi, and Yasui. I'm now going through the bibliography of this book, there's so much that I want to explore before rereading this book with more context.
Salvage and spoilage are books that came out of the JERS study from UC Berkeley (the researchers make their own appearances in the book), referring to those who were resettled early to the east coast and those were imprisoned at Tule Lake, respectively. Accordingly, the sections of Questions 27 & 28 focus on these groups in that order. Residue was an unpublished third book meant to cover the experiences of those who stayed in the camps and mostly went back to the west coast.
Yamashita covers lots of cool historical documents and testimonies in the book. For example, Wayne Collins, an attorney who worked to restore citizenship to the renunciants (mentioned when I visited Bainbridge island recently), has his story told through actual letters sent between him and his clients. He also takes a position a la Jay Caspian Kang towards the JACL, accusing them of using cooperation with internment as a way to bolster their own social reputations. I also learned about the fair play committee and the hoshi dan, two resistance organizations from Heart Mountain and Tule Lake, which took two very different approaches to the two questions: resistance by appealing to the social contract of the US constitution and reclamation of a Japanese patriotic identity.
I was also inspired by the narrative of Aiko Herzig-Yoshinaga and the importance of historical research: it was through her work that the redress movement was able to uncover the suppression of evidence for the military necessity of internment and build towards the overturning of Korematsu, Hirabayashi, and Yasui. I'm now going through the bibliography of this book, there's so much that I want to explore before rereading this book with more context.
July 19, 2026
Thanks to NetGalley and Brilliance Audio for the Audiobook ARC!
Karen Tei Yamashita’s Questions 27 & 28 is a deeply ambitious and structurally complex work that tackles one of the darkest chapters in American history: the forced internment of Japanese Americans during World War II. Taking its title from the infamous loyalty questionnaire issued by the U.S. government, the book is less a traditional narrative than a collage of voices, historical documents, and theatrical formats.
There is no denying Yamashita’s inside and out familiarity with the subject. She brilliantly captures the fragmentation of identity, family, and community caused by Executive Order 9066. The emotional center of the book—navigating the impossible choice of answering "yes" or "no" to questions demanding total allegiance while being stripped of basic rights—is profoundly moving and historically vital. The way she weaves together the political and the deeply personal is incredibly smart.
However, the book's greatest strength is also its biggest hurdle. The non-linear, avant-garde structure can feel incredibly jarring. Because the narrative constantly shifts styles and perspectives, it often feels alienating, keeping the reader at arm's length just as you begin to connect with a specific character or storyline. At times, the prose veers so far into the academic and experimental that the emotional momentum stalls.
Ultimately, Questions 27 & 28 is an important, intellectual piece of literature, but it requires a lot of heavy lifting from the reader. If you love experimental fiction and historical deconstruction, this will be a fascinating read. If you are looking for a cohesive, character-driven story, you might find yourself feeling a bit disconnected.
Karen Tei Yamashita’s Questions 27 & 28 is a deeply ambitious and structurally complex work that tackles one of the darkest chapters in American history: the forced internment of Japanese Americans during World War II. Taking its title from the infamous loyalty questionnaire issued by the U.S. government, the book is less a traditional narrative than a collage of voices, historical documents, and theatrical formats.
There is no denying Yamashita’s inside and out familiarity with the subject. She brilliantly captures the fragmentation of identity, family, and community caused by Executive Order 9066. The emotional center of the book—navigating the impossible choice of answering "yes" or "no" to questions demanding total allegiance while being stripped of basic rights—is profoundly moving and historically vital. The way she weaves together the political and the deeply personal is incredibly smart.
However, the book's greatest strength is also its biggest hurdle. The non-linear, avant-garde structure can feel incredibly jarring. Because the narrative constantly shifts styles and perspectives, it often feels alienating, keeping the reader at arm's length just as you begin to connect with a specific character or storyline. At times, the prose veers so far into the academic and experimental that the emotional momentum stalls.
Ultimately, Questions 27 & 28 is an important, intellectual piece of literature, but it requires a lot of heavy lifting from the reader. If you love experimental fiction and historical deconstruction, this will be a fascinating read. If you are looking for a cohesive, character-driven story, you might find yourself feeling a bit disconnected.
July 28, 2026
Following the bombing of Attack on Pearl Harbor, more than 120,000 Japanese Americans were forcibly removed from their homes and placed in U.S. incarceration camps under an executive order. Later, those imprisoned were handed what became known as the loyalty questionnaire.
The title refers to two of the most controversial questions:
❓️Question 27 asked if they were willing to serve in combat for the U.S. military
❓️Question 28 asked if they would swear unqualified allegiance to the United States and renounce allegiance to the Japanese emperor
Imagine being imprisoned without cause and then being asked to prove your loyalty to the same government that put you there. The answers divided families, friendships, and entire communities for years.
In this book the author takes that history and builds a multi generational novel around it. She blends fact and fiction, archival elements, and personal stories to show the lasting ripple effects of injustice.
For me it was a heavy read in every sense. The subject matter carries real emotional weight, and at 448 pages, this is not one you rush through in a weekend.
What I liked most was how personal it felt. Its easy for history to become a bunch of dates and policies but this book brings it back to the people, identity, familes and what gets carried forward through generations.
This is a great choice for readers who enjoy literary and historical fiction that teaches without preaching
There are so many great releases! We Burned So Bright & Boring Asian Female also come out tomorrow, so be sure to follow me and come back for my reviews of these and more, but I can already say this now: you want these in your cart.
Thanks @NetGalley , authors, and publishers
The title refers to two of the most controversial questions:
❓️Question 27 asked if they were willing to serve in combat for the U.S. military
❓️Question 28 asked if they would swear unqualified allegiance to the United States and renounce allegiance to the Japanese emperor
Imagine being imprisoned without cause and then being asked to prove your loyalty to the same government that put you there. The answers divided families, friendships, and entire communities for years.
In this book the author takes that history and builds a multi generational novel around it. She blends fact and fiction, archival elements, and personal stories to show the lasting ripple effects of injustice.
For me it was a heavy read in every sense. The subject matter carries real emotional weight, and at 448 pages, this is not one you rush through in a weekend.
What I liked most was how personal it felt. Its easy for history to become a bunch of dates and policies but this book brings it back to the people, identity, familes and what gets carried forward through generations.
This is a great choice for readers who enjoy literary and historical fiction that teaches without preaching
There are so many great releases! We Burned So Bright & Boring Asian Female also come out tomorrow, so be sure to follow me and come back for my reviews of these and more, but I can already say this now: you want these in your cart.
Thanks @NetGalley , authors, and publishers
May 22, 2026
I really wanted to love, not just like, this novel. And I might have if there were one character you could follow through this complicated story of Japanese immigration to the US. I almost think that Karen Tei Yamashita went back and forth about whether to make this book fiction or non-fiction and decided to go with a combo which seems to be bursting with facts and missing the human touch.
Question 27 on the loyalty questionnaire given to people in internment camps to ask whether they would be willing to serve in the US military. Question 28 asked them--a great many of whom were US citizens who'd never been to Japan-- to renounce loyalty to the Japanese emperor. The reactions to these questions among the people forcibly interned in the back of beyond is real human drama, We don't get to see this, which is a huge miss.
What Questions 27 and 28 does is let us see the breadth of Japanese immigration from the 19th century. The depth of the research is impressive and I look forward to Yamashita next work. Thanks to NetGalley and the publisher for a digital review copy. This is my honest review.
Question 27 on the loyalty questionnaire given to people in internment camps to ask whether they would be willing to serve in the US military. Question 28 asked them--a great many of whom were US citizens who'd never been to Japan-- to renounce loyalty to the Japanese emperor. The reactions to these questions among the people forcibly interned in the back of beyond is real human drama, We don't get to see this, which is a huge miss.
What Questions 27 and 28 does is let us see the breadth of Japanese immigration from the 19th century. The depth of the research is impressive and I look forward to Yamashita next work. Thanks to NetGalley and the publisher for a digital review copy. This is my honest review.
September 3, 2026
You know the Japanese were interned during WW 2, and yet you don’t know. That’s the premise: how do understand the events that led to internment and how did a nation re-imagine the consequences? The project is meta-narrative in design and uses an archivist framework to navigate and unfold the story, which is great hook, but can be too cerebral for some people because it’s a novel that forces you to engage the arch, not ride with the arch as most novels do. And the things you connect, really make you see the many experiences Japanese were living and what spurred their later activism in a post World War 2 America. Brilliant if you give it some patience, which I feel it deserves, but I know people will hit a wall and I think it’s part of the design. The author quotes Hiroshima, mon Amour, You saw nothing; I saw everything which is a constant motif through out the book and really keeps playing with the reader and ideas of justice, memory and remembrance all converge on the page. More importantly, it’s a novel for a world, where these ideas don’t stop taking shape and these events mirror what is happening to Latin American immigrants, such a heartbreaking connection this book makes.
June 30, 2026
I learned many things. I knew the basic outline of the story of the camps before reading the book, and this book puts a lot of flesh on that skeleton.
The writing is done well, immersing us in the story when at its best. And it is an important set of stories. It is important to know that there are archived memos detailing that the US Army knew that there was no military need to force everyone (west of Phoenix) of Japanese descent into concentration camps in 1942.
But the book is encyclopedic and wanders widely on the map. I rolled my eyes at the chapters written from the point of view of a camera, or a sheet of photographic film. The chapter from the point of view of a trombone was an engaging story, but I had to keep reminding myself who the "I" was. The nearly half page of hex code download of an iris scan served only to tell me that the author chased down every rabbit hole.
And after all that, there can be no doubt that the Japanese internment camps were not an aberration. This national crime was very much consistent with the rest of the historical behavior of the US.
The writing is done well, immersing us in the story when at its best. And it is an important set of stories. It is important to know that there are archived memos detailing that the US Army knew that there was no military need to force everyone (west of Phoenix) of Japanese descent into concentration camps in 1942.
But the book is encyclopedic and wanders widely on the map. I rolled my eyes at the chapters written from the point of view of a camera, or a sheet of photographic film. The chapter from the point of view of a trombone was an engaging story, but I had to keep reminding myself who the "I" was. The nearly half page of hex code download of an iris scan served only to tell me that the author chased down every rabbit hole.
And after all that, there can be no doubt that the Japanese internment camps were not an aberration. This national crime was very much consistent with the rest of the historical behavior of the US.
July 15, 2026
Questions 27 & 28
Karen Tei Yamashita
Publication Date: June 30, 2026
ALC courtesy of Brilliance Audio and NetGalley.
In Questions 27 & 28, Karen Tei Yamashita blends together historical documents, oral history and fiction in a well-researched analysis of Japanese immigration to the United States, and is a powerful statement on institutional racism that, all too frequently, targets immigrants and U.S. citizens of whichever ethnicity the U.S. is currently at war with. How national fear and anger unfortunately is directed to elements within our own society in times of crisis.
The multiple perspectives and timelines may be confusing, although the distinct voice and cadence of each narrator effectively helps in this regard. The experimental structure works, but personally, I think this would have been more effective as straight non-fiction.
3 stars
4 stars for narration
Karen Tei Yamashita
Publication Date: June 30, 2026
ALC courtesy of Brilliance Audio and NetGalley.
In Questions 27 & 28, Karen Tei Yamashita blends together historical documents, oral history and fiction in a well-researched analysis of Japanese immigration to the United States, and is a powerful statement on institutional racism that, all too frequently, targets immigrants and U.S. citizens of whichever ethnicity the U.S. is currently at war with. How national fear and anger unfortunately is directed to elements within our own society in times of crisis.
The multiple perspectives and timelines may be confusing, although the distinct voice and cadence of each narrator effectively helps in this regard. The experimental structure works, but personally, I think this would have been more effective as straight non-fiction.
3 stars
4 stars for narration
September 20, 2026
I think I read the perfect description of this book “the most nonfiction-fiction book you will ever read.” I had so much hope. I have so much obsession around WWII. The description was amazing. It’s about Japanese Americans that were forced to concentration camps in the US during WWII and basically asked to give up their US citizenships or go fight in the war. Many of these Japanese Americans had been horned here and didn’t even speak Japanese and have never even visited the island. This book is written in three sections- families before the war, families during war and the aftermath. Non of the stories are related but full of facts (?) surrounding the events that occurred. Hard to tell what was real and what was “made up.” Was it educational? Yes. Was it super dull and brining? Also yes. I do feel like I have learned some insight about the discrimination and suffering of the Americans with Japanese backgrounds. But not what I had signed up for to read.
Review of advance copy received from Netgalley
This is a 4.5 rounded up to a 5 because I think it is incredibly well done but at the same time, I don't know that it will reach wider audiences because it is challenging on many levels. Karen Tei Yamashita digs deep into pre-WWII Japanese-American history through the war and beyond to create a complex narrative around the Japanese-American experience. Despite being fairly well-versed in these histories, I found myself having to Google various names and events. I bet there will be many a reader who will not even realize that these are real, historical figures! But seriously, look it up because it will reveal so much. I really liked how Yamashita utilized a large number of voices and experimented with different styles to give each part a distinct voice. At the same time, she succeeded in maintaining a strong connecting line throughout. This book is a college course in book form.
July 10, 2026
DNF at 40%.
I listened to the audiobook and it was well narrated by the cast of narrators.
From the cover and title, I was hoping that this novel would have a cast of characters in the internment camps and the novel would explore their experiences and choices. This novel is absolutely not this. For a start, it's not a novel. This is a set of standalone short stories with very few overlapping characters. Except that none are particularly memorable (asides from Storm in Me-hi-co) and i frequently wondered what the point of various stories was. There was no sense that this was building anywhere. Not one I can recommend.
I received an advance review copy for free, and I am leaving this review voluntarily.
I listened to the audiobook and it was well narrated by the cast of narrators.
From the cover and title, I was hoping that this novel would have a cast of characters in the internment camps and the novel would explore their experiences and choices. This novel is absolutely not this. For a start, it's not a novel. This is a set of standalone short stories with very few overlapping characters. Except that none are particularly memorable (asides from Storm in Me-hi-co) and i frequently wondered what the point of various stories was. There was no sense that this was building anywhere. Not one I can recommend.
I received an advance review copy for free, and I am leaving this review voluntarily.
June 30, 2026
I enjoyed a lot of this book and looked up more than I ever have for a fiction novel. I know more about real people that were in the internment camps, but I don't feel like I have any more of a linear understanding of the experience. It's more like you are standing in a wave and it all washes over you. I feel like if I had a better memory, I would catch more connections between the sections, but I didn't have the energy to go back very often to see where pieces fit together. I highly recommend for someone who has a good grasp of the history and wants to get a feel of the people; not so much for people who are just starting to dip their toes into the topic.
Review of advance copy received from Publisher
This was truly a work of art. What Yamashita has done, weaving historical archival material as part of the story about Japanese Americans before, during and after WWII was so original and extraordinarily well done. And the so called loyalty questions put forth to Americans who were incarcerated in American concentration camps and how it splinted families and communities. This also depicts how the more time goes by, the more things stay the same. An important read especially in today’s times.
I received an arc from the publisher but all opinions are my own.
I received an arc from the publisher but all opinions are my own.
Review of advance copy received from NetGalley
As I started reading this book, I was initially confused. But I know just enough history to see what Yamashita was doing with this book and I appreciated it greatly. I confess that I ran out of time and didn't finish it, but after it is published I will get a hard copy and tackle it. It's a lot, but I feel like it could end up being one of the more important books published this year. I read enough to get that feeling and thus my five star rating.
Thank you to NetGalley for an advance copy of this book. It will be appreciated.
Thank you to NetGalley for an advance copy of this book. It will be appreciated.
June 11, 2026
Yamashita has meticulously researched records of oral histories of the Japanese experience of immigration and settlement in America. She shares that, along with imagined conversations, poetry, quotes and archival records of the loyalty questions are that tore apart a traumatized community. This is not an easy read but gives us a multi-faceted view of people’s experiences. Yamashita uses a different historical character to describe different aspects of the immigration,settlement, wartime hysteria which led to removal from the west coast, camp life, No Nos, resettlement, andcourt cases.
July 15, 2026
Huge disappointment. This read like someone stitched together about 100 barely-if-at-all-connected primary sources from an AP US History DBQ and called it a novel. Very little storytelling is done here, the prose is delivered with the monotone of a court expert witness, and you feel like you are a research assistant working for free and sifting through a tedium of archival research rather than a reader engaging with a novel. An important subject and an interesting formal approach, I’m sure someone will be enthralled by this, but man did it fall flat for me.
August 1, 2026
Rounded up from 3.5. there is no doubt that this book is an incredible, genre-bending work of historical fiction… the depth of engagement with archive, the snow-globing of material — shaking it up, changing perspectives, narrators, objects, experiences is truly brilliant. That said, I didn’t enjoy it. It was mentally exhausting to get through and to try and understand what is real and what isn’t. I don’t regret reading it one bit and learned a great deal. I feel about this book kind of the way I feel about Beyoncé’s latest albums… no question of the brilliance. Not my favorite to listen to.
August 4, 2026
Karen Tei Yamashita chronologically divides Questions 27 & 28 into three parts: Salvage (1892–1943), Spoilage (1942–1988), and Prejudice (1944–2022). The author’s research uncovers historical narratives surrounding Japanese Americans’ internment at concentration camps and fictionalizes true events. Like a compilation of historical short stories, Yamashita creatively uses various forms, styles, and voices to reconstruct experiences of Issei, Nisei, and Kibei characters as the government scrutinizes their loyalty to their home.
My thanks to Graywolf Press and NetGalley for an ARC.
My thanks to Graywolf Press and NetGalley for an ARC.
July 27, 2026
a book that does what it does well and should really be right up my alley but man did i struggle with it. i’m no dummy and have no problem with intentionally obtuse works of art but i was most interested when it was taking a creative bend to nonfiction (the found form stuff, fantastic) rather than the fictionalized pieces and i felt kinda stupid the whole way through. maybe i am just kinda dumb. who’s to say
Did Not Finish
August 12, 2026I had an audio version only and it is very difficult to follow and feel engaged. You feel like you are plunged in the middle of a story that you (or I at least) know too little about: Japanese immigration in the US. It starts interesting with a poet who comes to the US in the 1890s, but it rushes through his life in no-time and I was disorienting already. Then we jump to a different person.
I suspect this will work much better with a physical copy where you can flip back and forth.
I suspect this will work much better with a physical copy where you can flip back and forth.
Review of advance copy received from Publisher
This book is important. But, more to the point, it is really really good. Karen Tei Yamashita takes people reduced by the government to stripped-down, forgotten data and, with water and light, grows them into the beautiful irreducible stories they were meant to be.
"Answering yes-yes makes the game shorter," she writes, "but you don't necessarily get out or win."
"Answering yes-yes makes the game shorter," she writes, "but you don't necessarily get out or win."
Displaying 1 - 30 of 53 reviews