When the first edition of Queering the Pitch was published in early 1994, it was immediately hailed as a landmark and defining work in the new field of Gay Musicology. The first collection of its kind, its contributors covered a wide range of subjects from analysis of the work of gay composers to queer readings of Schubert''s Unfinished Symphony. Among the contributors were many then-new scholars, --including the late Philip Brett (one of the editors of the first edition), Susan McClary, Jennifer Rycenga, Paul Attinello, and Martha Mockus--who have since become leaders in the field. In light of the explosion of Gay Musicology since 1994, a new edition of Queering the Pitch is timely and needed. In this new work, the editors are including a landmark essay by Philip Brett on Gay Musicology, its history and scope, which was written for Grove''s Dictionary of Music-but only published in a greatly reduced version, because of its strong political approach. The essay itself has become a cause celebre, and this will be its first full appearance in print. Along with this new historical essay, the editors are contributing a new introduction that outlines the changes that have occurred over the last decade as Gay Musicology has grown
Read this for an opera class at school... it's a fascinating collection of essays. The best one is about how queer people apparently listen to music differently than the rest of the population.
Again, like "Queer Ear"( reviewed earlier) fab/useful,reparatively gay on composers like Smyth's and Schubert's lives and loves (much needed); but reductive, even I say(as an uber gay-gay-gay super-gay man....); music, unless with words(lieder, songs, opera) is ultimately NON- referential: non(harmonic-) resolution, for example, or an unresolved cadence CAN be some vague metaphorical representation of the composer's /character's (if programmatic music) troubled state of mind; but the mechanism making it DEFINITIVELY so is-at best-insubstantial, a childlike(beautifully so!) EKPHRASTIC EQUIVALENCE; at best, disingenuous.
(instrumental)Music is the only art-form where the musical essence {CALL me an essentialist on this.....!}-instrumentation, harmony, structure -is not a sexual or gender identity; though its historical context, and its composer's life, can certainly be.
Remember, we struggle NOT because we are homosexual[QUA], we struggle because hegemonic society makes life difficult to impossible for homosexuals.
Where, there are clear referents (signifiers and signiFIEDS), yes, PLEASE bring on the gay gay gay...literature being a clear example.