What do you think?
Rate this book
Institutes: A New Compend
This new and concise abridgement of Ford Lewis Battle's Calvin: Institutes of the Christian Religion is an easy-to-read introductory overview that will better acquaint the reader with Calvin. Consisting of thoughtfully chosen selections, this condensed edition of the Institutes helps fulfill the contemporary demand of scholars, ministers, students, and other persons who desire authentic texts of a relgious and cultural tradition.
184 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1536
About the author
John Calvin
1,833 books567 followersFrench-Swiss theologian John Calvin broke with the Roman Catholic Church in 1533 and as Protestant set forth his tenets, known today, in
Institutes of the Christian Religion
(1536).
The religious doctrines of John Calvin emphasize the omnipotence of God, whose grace alone saves the elect.
* Jehan Cauvin
* Iohannes Calvinus (Latin)
* Jean Calvin (French)
Originally trained as a humanist lawyer around 1530, he went on to serve as a principal figure in the Reformation. He developed the system later called Calvinism.
After tensions provoked a violent uprising, Calvin fled to Basel and published the first edition of his seminal work. In that year of 1536, William Farel invited Calvin to help reform in Geneva. The city council resisted the implementation of ideas of Calvin and Farel and expelled both men. At the invitation of Martin Bucer, Calvin proceeded to Strasbourg as the minister of refugees. He continued to support the reform movement in Geneva, and people eventually invited him back to lead. Following return, he introduced new forms of government and liturgy. Following an influx of supportive refugees, new elections to the city council forced out opponents of Calvin. Calvin spent his final years, promoting the Reformation in Geneva and throughout Europe.
Calvin tirelessly wrote polemics and apologia. He also exchanged cordial and supportive letters with many reformers, including Philipp Melanchthon and Heinrich Bullinger. In addition, he wrote commentaries on most books of the Bible as well as treatises and confessional documents and regularly gave sermons throughout the week in Geneva. The Augustinian tradition influenced and led Calvin to expound the doctrine of predestination and the absolute sovereignty of God in salvation.
Calvin's writing and preaching provided the seeds for the branch of Protestantism that bears his name. His views live on chiefly in Presbyterian and Reformed denominations, which have spread throughout the world. Calvin's thought exerted considerable influence over major figures and entire movements, such as Puritanism, and some scholars argue that his ideas contributed to the rise of capitalism, individualism, and representative democracy in the west.
The religious doctrines of John Calvin emphasize the omnipotence of God, whose grace alone saves the elect.
* Jehan Cauvin
* Iohannes Calvinus (Latin)
* Jean Calvin (French)
Originally trained as a humanist lawyer around 1530, he went on to serve as a principal figure in the Reformation. He developed the system later called Calvinism.
After tensions provoked a violent uprising, Calvin fled to Basel and published the first edition of his seminal work. In that year of 1536, William Farel invited Calvin to help reform in Geneva. The city council resisted the implementation of ideas of Calvin and Farel and expelled both men. At the invitation of Martin Bucer, Calvin proceeded to Strasbourg as the minister of refugees. He continued to support the reform movement in Geneva, and people eventually invited him back to lead. Following return, he introduced new forms of government and liturgy. Following an influx of supportive refugees, new elections to the city council forced out opponents of Calvin. Calvin spent his final years, promoting the Reformation in Geneva and throughout Europe.
Calvin tirelessly wrote polemics and apologia. He also exchanged cordial and supportive letters with many reformers, including Philipp Melanchthon and Heinrich Bullinger. In addition, he wrote commentaries on most books of the Bible as well as treatises and confessional documents and regularly gave sermons throughout the week in Geneva. The Augustinian tradition influenced and led Calvin to expound the doctrine of predestination and the absolute sovereignty of God in salvation.
Calvin's writing and preaching provided the seeds for the branch of Protestantism that bears his name. His views live on chiefly in Presbyterian and Reformed denominations, which have spread throughout the world. Calvin's thought exerted considerable influence over major figures and entire movements, such as Puritanism, and some scholars argue that his ideas contributed to the rise of capitalism, individualism, and representative democracy in the west.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 611 reviews
August 2, 2012
Years ago I took a course in Reformation Theology for which this book was a required text. It was a good course, taught by a knowledgeable professor, who did not force us to read the entire book. After the course was over I determined to read the entire book, but abandoned it in frustration when I got to about p. 250. Last year, I had to use it for work and decided that, since that was the case, I was going to conquer it finally.
The book is a long treatise on systematic theology, meant to provide basic but thorough instruction in the Protestant faith. It has an obviously trinitarian structure, devoting three large sections to the work of the three Persons of the Christian Trinity, the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit, with a fourth section on the Christian Church. Along the way it discusses many things found in traditional Christian catechisms, such as the Ten Commandments, the Lord's Prayer, the Apostles' Creed, faith, prayer, and the importance of the Word (i.e. the Bible) and the sacraments.
The style of Calvin takes getting used to. Before he became a theologian, he was a lawyer, and it shows both in his style and in his manner of argumentation. He can write in long convoluted sentences that rival those of Proust himself. But when he is arguing a point about which he feels strongly, he can be not only lively but vitriolic. This can be startling, and even offensive by today's standards of political correctness, especially when he lets his theological opponents have it with both barrels.
But his argumentation, and the facts and research with which he backs it up, are staggering. One need only scan the footnotes and the indices to realize how much he quotes the Church Fathers, especially St. Augustine. In this he is obviously part of the Renaissance movement which aimed to go back to the sources of Christianity.
But he is also good at taking a point and looking at it from all sides. For example, when he discusses the Ten Commandments, he talks not only about how to obey a particular commandment, but how to avoid its opposite. And later when he discusses the sacraments, he defines very carefully what they are; this will influence his later discussion of whether it is proper to call various practices sacraments or not. He looks at what the Bible says, but also what was practiced in the early church, and what is done in his own time. Moreover, most often, he knows his opponents' opinions thoroughly, and seems to relish lining up the arguments and shooting them down one by one.
One thing that surprised me was his treatment of predestination, which is supposed, still today, to be something with which Calvinists are eternally obsessed. Even as he was writing about it, Calvin realized that this issue was a "hot potato," and he treats it carefully but not fearfully. The point he emphasizes is this: the fact that God chose beforehand those who would be saved (election) is meant to reassure us of salvation, not to make us full of doubt.
Another thing that surprised me was that Calvin's vehemence was not directed solely at Catholics in general and the unfortunate non-trinitarian Michael Servetus in particular. There were others as well. The targets of his rhetoric are not always mentioned by name, but they include Lutherans, Zwinglians and Anabaptists. This is the aspect of Calvin's work that makes me squirm the most, because I believe that if Christians hold differing opinions, the best way to handle it is respectful discussion. But Calvin was from a time when fervour burned bright and tempers and tongues waxed hot. When one takes this into consideration, he is quite cool-headed--most of the time!
The book is a long treatise on systematic theology, meant to provide basic but thorough instruction in the Protestant faith. It has an obviously trinitarian structure, devoting three large sections to the work of the three Persons of the Christian Trinity, the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit, with a fourth section on the Christian Church. Along the way it discusses many things found in traditional Christian catechisms, such as the Ten Commandments, the Lord's Prayer, the Apostles' Creed, faith, prayer, and the importance of the Word (i.e. the Bible) and the sacraments.
The style of Calvin takes getting used to. Before he became a theologian, he was a lawyer, and it shows both in his style and in his manner of argumentation. He can write in long convoluted sentences that rival those of Proust himself. But when he is arguing a point about which he feels strongly, he can be not only lively but vitriolic. This can be startling, and even offensive by today's standards of political correctness, especially when he lets his theological opponents have it with both barrels.
But his argumentation, and the facts and research with which he backs it up, are staggering. One need only scan the footnotes and the indices to realize how much he quotes the Church Fathers, especially St. Augustine. In this he is obviously part of the Renaissance movement which aimed to go back to the sources of Christianity.
But he is also good at taking a point and looking at it from all sides. For example, when he discusses the Ten Commandments, he talks not only about how to obey a particular commandment, but how to avoid its opposite. And later when he discusses the sacraments, he defines very carefully what they are; this will influence his later discussion of whether it is proper to call various practices sacraments or not. He looks at what the Bible says, but also what was practiced in the early church, and what is done in his own time. Moreover, most often, he knows his opponents' opinions thoroughly, and seems to relish lining up the arguments and shooting them down one by one.
One thing that surprised me was his treatment of predestination, which is supposed, still today, to be something with which Calvinists are eternally obsessed. Even as he was writing about it, Calvin realized that this issue was a "hot potato," and he treats it carefully but not fearfully. The point he emphasizes is this: the fact that God chose beforehand those who would be saved (election) is meant to reassure us of salvation, not to make us full of doubt.
Another thing that surprised me was that Calvin's vehemence was not directed solely at Catholics in general and the unfortunate non-trinitarian Michael Servetus in particular. There were others as well. The targets of his rhetoric are not always mentioned by name, but they include Lutherans, Zwinglians and Anabaptists. This is the aspect of Calvin's work that makes me squirm the most, because I believe that if Christians hold differing opinions, the best way to handle it is respectful discussion. But Calvin was from a time when fervour burned bright and tempers and tongues waxed hot. When one takes this into consideration, he is quite cool-headed--most of the time!
July 18, 2009
Just finished Volume 1. The first time I read this I was still an Arminian, and I appreciated it then. Now I am simply amazed. What a treasure this is.
May 6, 2017
Many wicked lies get mixed up with the tiny particles of truth in the writings of these philosophers.
I am here writing a review of John Calvin’s most famous book, but I can’t say I’ve actually read it. I have read an abridged version, one that preserves about 15% of the original. This is still a fair amount, considering that the unabridged version runs to well over 1,000 pages; but there is so much I missed that I feel a bit self-conscious writing a review.
John Calvin is arguably the most important Protestant theologian in history. Karl Barth once called Hegel the ‘Protestant Aquinas’, but the title seems more apt for Calvin, whose Institutes put into systematic form the new theology and dogma of the budding faith. Calvin begins with knowledge of God, then moves on to knowledge of Christ, the Christian life, justification by faith, prayer, election and predestination, the church and the sacraments, and much more along the way.
Calvin was a lawyer by training, and it shows in his style. Unlike Aquinas, who made careful arguments and addressed objections using logic, Calvin's primary mode of argument is to quote and interpret scripture, in much the same way as a lawyer might argue from legal precedent. You can also see his legal background in Calvin’s combative tone; he attacks and defends with all the cunning of a professional debater, and will use any rhetorical device available to win his case.
The two biggest theological influence on Calvin, it seems, were St. Paul and St. Augustine, both of whom were rather preoccupied with evil and sin. The gentleness of the Gospels seems totally absent from Calvin’s worldview. Perhaps this is due as much to his personality as his influences. Calvin struck me as rather saturnine and bitter, a man disappointed with the world. His mode of argument and cutting tone—treating all his interpretations of the Bible as self-evident and obvious, and his enemies as wicked deceivers—also made him, for me, a rather authoritarian guide through theology. And his zeal was manifested in deed as well as word. It was Calvin, after all, who oversaw the auto-da-fé of Michael Servetus, a Unitarian who believed in adult baptism.
Besides being a powerful thinker, Calvin was a powerful stylist. This book, in the French translation, remains one of the most influential works of French prose. He can swell into ecstasies as he describes the goodness of God, the mercy of Christ, and the bliss that awaits the elect in the next life. At other times, he can rain down fire and brimstone on sinners and reprobates, accusing humanity of universal sin and condemning human nature itself. One of his most characteristic moods is a powerful disgust with sin, which he sees as an inescapable part of earthly life, a pervasive filth that clings to everything. This quote gives a taste of his style:
Even babies bring their condemnation with them from their mother’s womb; they suffer for their own imperfection and no one else’s. Although they have not yet produced the fruits of sin, they have the seed within. Their whole nature is like a seedbed of sin and so must be hateful and repugnant to God.
The most controversial part of this book is, unsurprisingly, the section on predestination. Even before the creation of the world, God knew who would be saved and who would be damned. Our salvation is not ultimately due to any choices we make; we are entirely helpless, completely dependent on God’s grace. By ourselves, we earn and deserve nothing. Human nature can take no credit for goodness. The reason why some are saved and others damned is entirely mysterious. You can never know for sure if you are among God’s elect, but there are certain signs that give hope.
One thing I do admire about Calvin’s argument for predestination is that he achieves a brutal kind of consistency. God is all-powerful, and thus responsible for everything that happens; he is all-knowing, and so was aware of what would happen when he created the world; and he is infinitely good, so all goodness resides in him and not in us.
The only problem with this doctrine is that, when combined with the doctrine of heaven and hell, it makes God seem monstrously unjust. A God who creates a world in which the majority of its inhabitants will be inescapably condemned to everlasting torment is even worse than a man who breeds puppies just to throw them in the fire. Calvin makes much of the "inscrutability of God’s judgment"; but this is as much to say that you should believe Calvin's doctrines even though what he’s saying doesn’t make sense.
Calvin perhaps can’t be faulted too much for reaching this bleak conclusion. Theologians have been trying for a long time to square the attributes of God—omnipotence, omniscience, omnibenificence—with the qualities we observe in the world and the doctrine of heaven and hell. Everlasting punishment can only appear fair if the sinner brought it upon himself with his own free action (and even then, it seems like a stretch to call everlasting torment "fair").
But how can free will exist in a universe created by an all-powerful and all-knowing God? For if God knew exactly what was going to happen when the universe was created, and is ultimately responsible for everything that happens (since he created the universe with full knowledge of the consequences), then that would make God responsible for the existence of sinners, and thus we get this same absurdity of people being punished for things they were destined to do.
For my part, I find this question of predestination and punishment extremely interesting, since I think we will have to face similar paradoxes as we learn to explain human behavior. As our belief in free will is eroded through increasing knowledge of psychology and sociology, how will it affect our justice system?
In any case, I’m glad I read the abridged version, since I can’t imagine pushing myself through more than 1,000 pages of this book.
August 9, 2008
I read Book One of the Four volumes in this edition, and learned that all the caricatures of Calvin and Calvinism are as far off the mark as equating a Christian with a Muslim terrorist of 9/11.
What most people call "hypercalvinism" is more often than not simply "Calvinism," or "biblical." The doctrine of election, far from being called "Calvinism," ought to be reclaimed as simply "truth." What is properly hypercalvinism, however, (i.e.: prayer and evangelism are unnecessary due to God being sovereign) has NOTHING to do with what Calvin taught or believed.
The beauty of this book is that every truth is exegeted (taken out of) the Scripture. Most people speaking against the doctrine of election usually rest on a few verses that don't speak to the issue of election at all. C.S. Lewis, in his "Mere Chritianity," for instance, rests his argument for the presence of evil on the Arminian view of man's "free will," a fiction of imagination that neither Lewis nor other believers of free will support from Scripture.
Calvin shows that the sovereignty of God is merciful, not monstrous. Providence is treated as majestic, not cosmic puppetry or pernicious error. The presence of evil is explained in a humble view of what the Bible says on the subject, and the answer surprised me (though mostly because the Bible verses used were unfamiliar to me).
All in all, Calvin was a genius and is careful to explain the fact that we don't have the "freedom" to simply believe what is comfortable, but our beliefs must come from the Scripture. He is careful to show what the Church Fathers believed on subjects, and is not afraid to show the reader that even these respected teachers contradict Scripture to their shame. In other words: "Let God be true, and every man a liar."
If you want your faith to be stretched, Calvin's first book is a roadmap through the Bible on the fundamentals of a robust and biblical worldview.
Calvin, though a man, has written on the difficult teachings of the Scriptures by beginning exactly there: at the Scriptures
What most people call "hypercalvinism" is more often than not simply "Calvinism," or "biblical." The doctrine of election, far from being called "Calvinism," ought to be reclaimed as simply "truth." What is properly hypercalvinism, however, (i.e.: prayer and evangelism are unnecessary due to God being sovereign) has NOTHING to do with what Calvin taught or believed.
The beauty of this book is that every truth is exegeted (taken out of) the Scripture. Most people speaking against the doctrine of election usually rest on a few verses that don't speak to the issue of election at all. C.S. Lewis, in his "Mere Chritianity," for instance, rests his argument for the presence of evil on the Arminian view of man's "free will," a fiction of imagination that neither Lewis nor other believers of free will support from Scripture.
Calvin shows that the sovereignty of God is merciful, not monstrous. Providence is treated as majestic, not cosmic puppetry or pernicious error. The presence of evil is explained in a humble view of what the Bible says on the subject, and the answer surprised me (though mostly because the Bible verses used were unfamiliar to me).
All in all, Calvin was a genius and is careful to explain the fact that we don't have the "freedom" to simply believe what is comfortable, but our beliefs must come from the Scripture. He is careful to show what the Church Fathers believed on subjects, and is not afraid to show the reader that even these respected teachers contradict Scripture to their shame. In other words: "Let God be true, and every man a liar."
If you want your faith to be stretched, Calvin's first book is a roadmap through the Bible on the fundamentals of a robust and biblical worldview.
Calvin, though a man, has written on the difficult teachings of the Scriptures by beginning exactly there: at the Scriptures
October 4, 2013
This review was originally posted on my blog here:
https://brentthewalrus.com/2015/01/09...
Last January I begin an adventure that I had no idea how arduous it would be. As I begun to dive into Calvin's magisterial Institutes of the Christian Religion, I set out before me an endeavour that would slowly but surely change the way that I think on manifold facets. Although I would love to expound an innumerable levels on Calvin's thought, and what I have learned from this past year, I would rather, for brevity's sake, share very briefly three principles that Calvin has taught me which have slowly molded me and given me a very firm foundation to stand upon. Calvin has most assuredly given me a solid theologically footing and cornerstone that I may continue to construct and built upwards and sidewards, knowing that no matter if my many future pursuits be successful of failed, I will always have a sound, firm foundation to which I can rest safely and securely on, theologically speaking. In light of this fact, I believe that Calvin has taught me three very important principles which are thus: Calvin has taught me the importance of Christianity being--
1. Systematic
The great systematizer of the faith, Calvin's Institutes literally radically changed Western history as we know it. What is remarkable is what is so often ignored historically, but theologically speaking, Calvin accomplished what no man had every successfully done hitherto, and that is construct a coherent, cogent, and holistic framework of the Christian faith, written to inform, educate, instruct, teach, and guide not only pastors, but ideally laymen of the faith. Of the innumerable heresies and opponents that Calvin refutes throughout his magnum opus, his primary weapon was solely and unequivocally the Word of God, the sole arbiter of our Faith. Only secondarily does Calvin defer to the Church Fathers, Augustine being the foremost referenced of which Calvin said "we quote more frequently, as [Augustine] being the best and most faithful witness of all antiquity (Institutes 4.14.26), and tertiarily pagan philosophers, Seneca and Plato being among them. The idea is simple, how can one refute someone else's absurdly heretical claims if one does not have a systematic grasp on the entire Word of God? How can we deflect the proof-texting of misled garblers of true religion if we cannot systematize, harmonize, and cogently construct a holistic robust Christianity that will withstand the fiery cavils for misguided people? Now, more than ever, theology must be systematic, oppositions to the contrary notwithstanding. Calvin has enabled me to understand the importance of the aforesaid on a personal level.
2. Catholic
Calvin taught me the importance of the Church, which is not only visible and particular, but that it is also simultaneously invisible and universal. It is visible in that it is confined to the external preaching of the Word and the sacraments duly administered by presbyters to a congregation, but it is also invisible and catholic or universal, in that that all those in Christ are a part of one body, with Christ as the κεφαλή (1 Cor 11:3, Col 1:18, Eph 5:23). This includes not only those that are living, but those who have died in Christ heretofore, as we are all united in a real way to Christ, as His body, as he leads the true Church. This doesn't mean that the Church is going to be visibly pure, at least in the external. For as Augustine refuted the Donatists and Calvin the Anabaptists, as long as sin remains, and hypocrites can make a false confession of faith, so too will the visible and particular church remain a mix of both those who are truly regenerated and a part of Christ's body, and those who are merely feigning true religion, as the parable so aptly demonstrates (Matthew 13:24-30). Calvin has taught me to longsuffer with the Church, to give myself up for Her and suffer with her, and that true Christian unity isn't obtained by watering or knocking down doctrines deemed superfluous or antiquated in order to "unify" various denominations or factions, but rather by simply upholding Christ and Him crucified. By the two-fold preaching of the Gospel and administration of the sacraments, there can be no doubt, regardless of denomination, that Christ is truly present and that there is some semblance of a Church: "Wherever we see the word of God sincerely preached and heard, and wherever we see the sacraments administered according to the institution of Christ, there we cannot have any doubts that the church of God has some existence" (Institutes, 4.1.9).
3. Confessional
While the Reformation was the beginning of an explosion of Christian protestant thought for the better, the reformers would be utterly horrified, aghast, and appalled if they saw the current state of non-denominational evangelical Christianity in America today. While the nature of the Reformation was to protest, and the soil of America gave fertile ground in light of religious toleration for new factions, sects, denominations, and religions to forthwith spring up, the Reformers in no wise set out to overthrow systems, but rather simply to be faithful to the word of God. The inherent problem that I have seen personally in many non-denominational churches, notwithstanding the lack of ecclesiastical governance and church discipline, is that they are not confessional. This is something that arose as a corollary of the Reformation and the influence of Calvin's Institutes, but the confessions that were constructed to the benefit of millions of Christians then and now stand as solid posts wherewith we can stand firmly in-between knowing we will not accidentally stray from the path. Confessions such as the Westminster which arose after the English Civil War in the Puritan Commonwealth, or the Belgic and Helvetic confessions along with the Heidelberg Catechism. These documents are not timeless, and neither are they creeds whereby one has to assent to in order to become a Christian, but rather, they are confessions by which we affirm because we are Christians. As such, doctrines are perspicuously defined, and no such room is left for ambiguity, a problem that so wholly permeates through innumerable non-denominational Churches who leave their 'statements of faith' so excruciatingly and unacceptably equivocal which ultimately leads to dissensions, factions, and trifling altercations. By way of a side note, my wife and I have been attending an EPC (Evangelical Presbyterian Church, http://www.epc.org/) the past nine months, and we have been extremely blessed, seeing the fruit of putting ourselves under their leadership alerady.
In fine, Calvin's Institutes is not simply going back up on my bookshelf for future reference, but rather, an ideology and theologically deep well wherefrom I will continually draw from daily as I strive to built, construct, and create anew theologically, knowing that I will always have a firm foundation to stand upon, one that has stood the test of time: one that is tried and true.
-b
https://brentthewalrus.com/2015/01/09...
Last January I begin an adventure that I had no idea how arduous it would be. As I begun to dive into Calvin's magisterial Institutes of the Christian Religion, I set out before me an endeavour that would slowly but surely change the way that I think on manifold facets. Although I would love to expound an innumerable levels on Calvin's thought, and what I have learned from this past year, I would rather, for brevity's sake, share very briefly three principles that Calvin has taught me which have slowly molded me and given me a very firm foundation to stand upon. Calvin has most assuredly given me a solid theologically footing and cornerstone that I may continue to construct and built upwards and sidewards, knowing that no matter if my many future pursuits be successful of failed, I will always have a sound, firm foundation to which I can rest safely and securely on, theologically speaking. In light of this fact, I believe that Calvin has taught me three very important principles which are thus: Calvin has taught me the importance of Christianity being--
1. Systematic
The great systematizer of the faith, Calvin's Institutes literally radically changed Western history as we know it. What is remarkable is what is so often ignored historically, but theologically speaking, Calvin accomplished what no man had every successfully done hitherto, and that is construct a coherent, cogent, and holistic framework of the Christian faith, written to inform, educate, instruct, teach, and guide not only pastors, but ideally laymen of the faith. Of the innumerable heresies and opponents that Calvin refutes throughout his magnum opus, his primary weapon was solely and unequivocally the Word of God, the sole arbiter of our Faith. Only secondarily does Calvin defer to the Church Fathers, Augustine being the foremost referenced of which Calvin said "we quote more frequently, as [Augustine] being the best and most faithful witness of all antiquity (Institutes 4.14.26), and tertiarily pagan philosophers, Seneca and Plato being among them. The idea is simple, how can one refute someone else's absurdly heretical claims if one does not have a systematic grasp on the entire Word of God? How can we deflect the proof-texting of misled garblers of true religion if we cannot systematize, harmonize, and cogently construct a holistic robust Christianity that will withstand the fiery cavils for misguided people? Now, more than ever, theology must be systematic, oppositions to the contrary notwithstanding. Calvin has enabled me to understand the importance of the aforesaid on a personal level.
2. Catholic
Calvin taught me the importance of the Church, which is not only visible and particular, but that it is also simultaneously invisible and universal. It is visible in that it is confined to the external preaching of the Word and the sacraments duly administered by presbyters to a congregation, but it is also invisible and catholic or universal, in that that all those in Christ are a part of one body, with Christ as the κεφαλή (1 Cor 11:3, Col 1:18, Eph 5:23). This includes not only those that are living, but those who have died in Christ heretofore, as we are all united in a real way to Christ, as His body, as he leads the true Church. This doesn't mean that the Church is going to be visibly pure, at least in the external. For as Augustine refuted the Donatists and Calvin the Anabaptists, as long as sin remains, and hypocrites can make a false confession of faith, so too will the visible and particular church remain a mix of both those who are truly regenerated and a part of Christ's body, and those who are merely feigning true religion, as the parable so aptly demonstrates (Matthew 13:24-30). Calvin has taught me to longsuffer with the Church, to give myself up for Her and suffer with her, and that true Christian unity isn't obtained by watering or knocking down doctrines deemed superfluous or antiquated in order to "unify" various denominations or factions, but rather by simply upholding Christ and Him crucified. By the two-fold preaching of the Gospel and administration of the sacraments, there can be no doubt, regardless of denomination, that Christ is truly present and that there is some semblance of a Church: "Wherever we see the word of God sincerely preached and heard, and wherever we see the sacraments administered according to the institution of Christ, there we cannot have any doubts that the church of God has some existence" (Institutes, 4.1.9).
3. Confessional
While the Reformation was the beginning of an explosion of Christian protestant thought for the better, the reformers would be utterly horrified, aghast, and appalled if they saw the current state of non-denominational evangelical Christianity in America today. While the nature of the Reformation was to protest, and the soil of America gave fertile ground in light of religious toleration for new factions, sects, denominations, and religions to forthwith spring up, the Reformers in no wise set out to overthrow systems, but rather simply to be faithful to the word of God. The inherent problem that I have seen personally in many non-denominational churches, notwithstanding the lack of ecclesiastical governance and church discipline, is that they are not confessional. This is something that arose as a corollary of the Reformation and the influence of Calvin's Institutes, but the confessions that were constructed to the benefit of millions of Christians then and now stand as solid posts wherewith we can stand firmly in-between knowing we will not accidentally stray from the path. Confessions such as the Westminster which arose after the English Civil War in the Puritan Commonwealth, or the Belgic and Helvetic confessions along with the Heidelberg Catechism. These documents are not timeless, and neither are they creeds whereby one has to assent to in order to become a Christian, but rather, they are confessions by which we affirm because we are Christians. As such, doctrines are perspicuously defined, and no such room is left for ambiguity, a problem that so wholly permeates through innumerable non-denominational Churches who leave their 'statements of faith' so excruciatingly and unacceptably equivocal which ultimately leads to dissensions, factions, and trifling altercations. By way of a side note, my wife and I have been attending an EPC (Evangelical Presbyterian Church, http://www.epc.org/) the past nine months, and we have been extremely blessed, seeing the fruit of putting ourselves under their leadership alerady.
In fine, Calvin's Institutes is not simply going back up on my bookshelf for future reference, but rather, an ideology and theologically deep well wherefrom I will continually draw from daily as I strive to built, construct, and create anew theologically, knowing that I will always have a firm foundation to stand upon, one that has stood the test of time: one that is tried and true.
-b
December 27, 2007
if i ever finish this, i will immediately begin it again
August 4, 2011
John Calvin is likely one of the most vilified, misunderstood, and unread men still discussed today. His influence is remarkable, and his most famous work, Institutes, is his crowning achievement. This is an ambitious and towering work that attempts to set forth a systematic understanding of Scripture and a defense of Reformed doctrine against the apostate Catholic church.
What Calvin has given us, as Abraham Kuyper says, "Calvinism means the completed evolution of Protestantism, resulting in a both higher and richer stage of human development." Calvin builds his theological primarily upon the work of Augustine, but acknowledges a number of other church fathers.
The famous "TULIP" acronym hardly scratches the surface of Calvin's theology. Calvin, is in fact, the father of modern theology.
The work itself is long, but is broken into small segments that make the work very accessible, and allow it to be read slowly and methodically. I read this over the course of ten months taking small chunks at a time. It is a good way to read it. I recommend highlighting portions and returning to them later to make a more lasting impression of the work.
This is an important book for all Christians to read and one time or another. Highly recommended.
What Calvin has given us, as Abraham Kuyper says, "Calvinism means the completed evolution of Protestantism, resulting in a both higher and richer stage of human development." Calvin builds his theological primarily upon the work of Augustine, but acknowledges a number of other church fathers.
The famous "TULIP" acronym hardly scratches the surface of Calvin's theology. Calvin, is in fact, the father of modern theology.
The work itself is long, but is broken into small segments that make the work very accessible, and allow it to be read slowly and methodically. I read this over the course of ten months taking small chunks at a time. It is a good way to read it. I recommend highlighting portions and returning to them later to make a more lasting impression of the work.
This is an important book for all Christians to read and one time or another. Highly recommended.
April 21, 2012
2021: How I love this book! I read it again in 2020-2021 plodding through it on Sundays. Great decision.
2015: A favorite indeed. Always at hand.
2015: A favorite indeed. Always at hand.
December 11, 2024
What an absolute journey!!
Truly a rich well of deep theology, practical meditation, hopeful expectations of all who God is for us in Christ. A lengthy review wouldn’t do it justice since it’s a classic and one of the most important works of Christian doctrine and living ever penned.
Calvin was not perfect by any means, but he was an astute scholar, tender pastor, and intelligent theologian.
If you think Calvin is summarized in the Calvinist acronym TULIP or that he was some grumpy old monk who ate predestination for breakfast…think again.
For context, he only spends about 30 pages on that subject in the whole volume👀
This book was a joy to wade through and I look forward to sitting under John Calvin’s teaching again someday. Every Christian should take up the bravery to plunge these depths at least once in their life!
Truly a rich well of deep theology, practical meditation, hopeful expectations of all who God is for us in Christ. A lengthy review wouldn’t do it justice since it’s a classic and one of the most important works of Christian doctrine and living ever penned.
Calvin was not perfect by any means, but he was an astute scholar, tender pastor, and intelligent theologian.
If you think Calvin is summarized in the Calvinist acronym TULIP or that he was some grumpy old monk who ate predestination for breakfast…think again.
For context, he only spends about 30 pages on that subject in the whole volume👀
This book was a joy to wade through and I look forward to sitting under John Calvin’s teaching again someday. Every Christian should take up the bravery to plunge these depths at least once in their life!
![Profile Image for [Name Redacted].](https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/users/1347082397i/287915._UY200_CR0,0,200,200_.jpg)
January 28, 2011
Well, he's certainly...pedantic? I find that Calvin somehow manages to approach a religion grounded in love, mercy, compassion, purity and fidelity as though it were a cold, joyless intellectual exercise. He lacks the zeal of Luther, the passion of Augustine, the skill of Aquinas, and even the intellectualism of Evagrius... Were he alive today I somehow think he would be busy working for the IRS or writing the fine print in legal documents. It amazes me that my ancestors were so passionate about his theology.
UPDATE: Book 4 is, by far, the best of the volumes. His arguments about the Roman Catholic Church's claim to authority (pointing out that their claims of unbroken succession are insufficient to prove themselves the "true" church since the Greek churches could claim the same, yet the Romans considered the Greeks heretics and schismatics) and his arguments about the ways in which pride and hatred towards authority (since justly-used authority is usually exercised to correct and to prevent us from indulging our whims) are the true motivations behind the rejection of communal Christianity in favor of strictly individual worship and meditation (cf. today's "don't-believe-in-organized-religion" assertions) -- these are legitimately compelling.
UPDATE 2: What the...? Abruptly, and without any proof, he begins claiming that the Pope and all cardinals secretly don't believe in God, Jesus, the after-life or the Bible AT ALL! And that they secretly conspired to punish anyone who believes otherwise! Suddenly the origin of European conspiracy theories is laid bare before me...
UPDATE 3: He keeps alternating between excellent points and bizarre, labored interpretations of the Bible motivated (rather obviously) by a desperate desire to justify his own a priori conclusions. One of the silliest is his conclusion that the dietary prohibitions given to Gentiles in Acts were actually part of a commandment to be more charitable.
UPDATE 4: His arguments in favor of paedobaptism are remarkably weak. Their weakness is only exceeded by his vehemence in asserting them.
UPDATE: Book 4 is, by far, the best of the volumes. His arguments about the Roman Catholic Church's claim to authority (pointing out that their claims of unbroken succession are insufficient to prove themselves the "true" church since the Greek churches could claim the same, yet the Romans considered the Greeks heretics and schismatics) and his arguments about the ways in which pride and hatred towards authority (since justly-used authority is usually exercised to correct and to prevent us from indulging our whims) are the true motivations behind the rejection of communal Christianity in favor of strictly individual worship and meditation (cf. today's "don't-believe-in-organized-religion" assertions) -- these are legitimately compelling.
UPDATE 2: What the...? Abruptly, and without any proof, he begins claiming that the Pope and all cardinals secretly don't believe in God, Jesus, the after-life or the Bible AT ALL! And that they secretly conspired to punish anyone who believes otherwise! Suddenly the origin of European conspiracy theories is laid bare before me...
UPDATE 3: He keeps alternating between excellent points and bizarre, labored interpretations of the Bible motivated (rather obviously) by a desperate desire to justify his own a priori conclusions. One of the silliest is his conclusion that the dietary prohibitions given to Gentiles in Acts were actually part of a commandment to be more charitable.
UPDATE 4: His arguments in favor of paedobaptism are remarkably weak. Their weakness is only exceeded by his vehemence in asserting them.
May 8, 2012
I have now read this book three times: Battles’ translation in 2009, Beveridge’s translation in 2011-2013, and White’s translation of the earlier 1541 edition in 2020-2021. It is a classic work of Christianity, and one that I enjoy reading. It not only teaches systematic theology, but also practical theology, biblical theology, historical theology, and exhortations to the Christian life. And the humble spirit in which Calvin approaches his study is refreshing.
"When we see that the whole sum of our salvation, and every single part of it, is comprehended in Christ, we must beware of deriving even the minutest portion of it from any other quarter." (2.16.19)
"When we see that the whole sum of our salvation, and every single part of it, is comprehended in Christ, we must beware of deriving even the minutest portion of it from any other quarter." (2.16.19)
August 30, 2021
5.0 Stars - Top Read of 2021
After 8 months, I've finally finished! The profound and enduring Biblical insights and practical wisdom I received from this book would take another 8 months to recount, Calvin's Institutes is THE great theological tome. I will attempt to write a full review, eventually...
After 8 months, I've finally finished! The profound and enduring Biblical insights and practical wisdom I received from this book would take another 8 months to recount, Calvin's Institutes is THE great theological tome. I will attempt to write a full review, eventually...
August 4, 2011
I actually finished this a long time ago. Finished it several times, actually. If people read Calvin, they will soon learn that all their stereotypes of him are wrong. He said nothing on predestination that Aquinas didn't say, for example. Most adherents outside the tradition, if honest, must confess that they have not read calvin all the way through.
Even if one rejects Calvin's theology, one must still come to grips with his breakthroughs in epistemology. A head-in-the-sand approach is no longer possible (nor admissible)
A thorough book review is impossible, and in any case exceeds my abilities. There are a few points that are interesting, though:
Duplex Cognito Dei
God reveals himself to humans—not as he is—but in a form accessible to humans (archetype ---> ectype; Muller 229ff).
God is known generally as creator but only in Christ as Father and Redeemer (Muller 2003: p. 135)
The duplex cognito accounts for the move from Book 1 to Book 2 (Muller 2001: p. 137). It reflects the Pauline ordo as a movement from the description of sinful humanity before God to humanity in contact with the Redeemer. Muller suggests that this orders the transition to Books III and IV (138).
Book II, chapters 10-11.
Calvin notes the same promises are in the Old Testament as in the New (428).
Similarities between the two covenants (covenants being used as “testaments”): the goal of OT Jew was not carnal prosperity, but adoption and immortality. Secondly, the covenant by which they were bound was supported by God's grace, not their merits. Thirdly, Christ was present by way of shadow and anticipation (432).
Differences: there was stress on earthly blessings, but these were to lead to heavenly concerns (449). Secondly, truth was conveyed by images and ceremonies; the NT reveals the very substance. Thirdly, the OT is literal, NT is spiritual. Fourthly, bondage of the OT, freedom of the NT. Fifthly, the OT has reference to one nation; the NT to all nations (veil torn down in Christ; Gentiles called).
Book IV: Christ Rules by His Sceptre, which is His Word.
His take on the sacraments is probably most notable in this section.
Contrary to what people think, Calvin was not a revolutionary with regard to Church government and episcopal order, but since the bishops weren't feeding the flock and opposing the gospel, too bad for them.
Muller, Richard. After Calvin. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
-----------. The Unaccommodated Calvin: Studies in the Foundation of a Theological Tradition. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.
----------. Post-Reformation and Reformed Dogmatics vol. 1.
Even if one rejects Calvin's theology, one must still come to grips with his breakthroughs in epistemology. A head-in-the-sand approach is no longer possible (nor admissible)
A thorough book review is impossible, and in any case exceeds my abilities. There are a few points that are interesting, though:
Duplex Cognito Dei
God reveals himself to humans—not as he is—but in a form accessible to humans (archetype ---> ectype; Muller 229ff).
God is known generally as creator but only in Christ as Father and Redeemer (Muller 2003: p. 135)
The duplex cognito accounts for the move from Book 1 to Book 2 (Muller 2001: p. 137). It reflects the Pauline ordo as a movement from the description of sinful humanity before God to humanity in contact with the Redeemer. Muller suggests that this orders the transition to Books III and IV (138).
Book II, chapters 10-11.
Calvin notes the same promises are in the Old Testament as in the New (428).
Similarities between the two covenants (covenants being used as “testaments”): the goal of OT Jew was not carnal prosperity, but adoption and immortality. Secondly, the covenant by which they were bound was supported by God's grace, not their merits. Thirdly, Christ was present by way of shadow and anticipation (432).
Differences: there was stress on earthly blessings, but these were to lead to heavenly concerns (449). Secondly, truth was conveyed by images and ceremonies; the NT reveals the very substance. Thirdly, the OT is literal, NT is spiritual. Fourthly, bondage of the OT, freedom of the NT. Fifthly, the OT has reference to one nation; the NT to all nations (veil torn down in Christ; Gentiles called).
Book IV: Christ Rules by His Sceptre, which is His Word.
His take on the sacraments is probably most notable in this section.
Contrary to what people think, Calvin was not a revolutionary with regard to Church government and episcopal order, but since the bishops weren't feeding the flock and opposing the gospel, too bad for them.
Muller, Richard. After Calvin. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
-----------. The Unaccommodated Calvin: Studies in the Foundation of a Theological Tradition. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.
----------. Post-Reformation and Reformed Dogmatics vol. 1.
January 4, 2017
Magisterial. What is there to be said which hasn't already been said?
June 18, 2019
I have dedicated six months to this book. I will not regret those months, for truly I have been edified by the words of Calvin.
March 29, 2024
So surreal to read the final page after 4 years of working through it.
April 7, 2020
A work like Calvin's Institutes is hard to review because of how much an experience going through the work is. Part of it is probably due to the fact that I read it slowly over the course of a year, as opposed to most books which are read over the course of just a couple weeks or months. A good part of it also simply has to do with the breadth of topics that are covered, though, in this monumental work of the Protestant Reformation.
A few key themes stood out at me as I read: Calvin's reliance on the early church fathers, his in-depth understanding of the classical authors, his ever-present pastoral, counseling tone, and the strong polemical nature of the work against the Catholic hegemony of his day. The strong polemical tone made some parts of the work less relevant now for most readers as they were back in the day (unless you're reading it for his critique on Catholicism), and it sometimes dragged for me. However, I understand his reasons for this back in the day and the strengths of the work more than make up for it.
Overall, Institutes is not only a great work of historical relevance which would form the backbone of Reformed theology, but it's more practical for Christian living than its current reputation may suggest, and one I'm very glad to have read.
Rating: 4.5 Stars (Excellent).
A few key themes stood out at me as I read: Calvin's reliance on the early church fathers, his in-depth understanding of the classical authors, his ever-present pastoral, counseling tone, and the strong polemical nature of the work against the Catholic hegemony of his day. The strong polemical tone made some parts of the work less relevant now for most readers as they were back in the day (unless you're reading it for his critique on Catholicism), and it sometimes dragged for me. However, I understand his reasons for this back in the day and the strengths of the work more than make up for it.
Overall, Institutes is not only a great work of historical relevance which would form the backbone of Reformed theology, but it's more practical for Christian living than its current reputation may suggest, and one I'm very glad to have read.
Rating: 4.5 Stars (Excellent).
July 26, 2020
I agree with what Kevin Bauder said about Calvin's Institutes: "This kind of reading is not primarily about agreement or disagreement. It’s about watching a first-rate theological mind at work." Written nearly 500 years ago, the Institutes remains one of the most significant Christian works of all time. Incredibly, Calvin wrote the first edition when he was 27 . . . without a word processor!
My favorite chapters were on knowing God (ch. 1), justification by faith (ch. 6), predestination (ch. 8), prayer (ch. 9), and Christian liberty (ch. 14).
Reading the Institutes was a community project. It was a joy to read and discuss this book with Nate Bate and John Pate. I read the 2014 White translation, and it was excellent! His headings and footnotes were very helpful.
My favorite chapters were on knowing God (ch. 1), justification by faith (ch. 6), predestination (ch. 8), prayer (ch. 9), and Christian liberty (ch. 14).
Reading the Institutes was a community project. It was a joy to read and discuss this book with Nate Bate and John Pate. I read the 2014 White translation, and it was excellent! His headings and footnotes were very helpful.
May 3, 2020
Read 2019-2021 with Jaeger and crew
Read 2021-2024 with Ilse and crew
Currently reading 2023-2025 with Knox and crew
Planning to read 2025-2027 with Geneva and crew
I don't think I'll want to stop after that, either! So good!
5x5: Theology. Always rewarding.
Read 2021-2024 with Ilse and crew
Currently reading 2023-2025 with Knox and crew
Planning to read 2025-2027 with Geneva and crew
I don't think I'll want to stop after that, either! So good!
5x5: Theology. Always rewarding.
June 15, 2026
It feels great to finally finish this. I can't say I'll be returning to every part of this, or reread every bit (farewell chapters on church governance, you won't be missed). Calvin's chapters on providence, Christ, faith, and the Lord's Supper were my favorite sections.
This is most emphatically NOT a systematic theology! Rather, Calvin kept his prefatory letter to the King of France of 1536 even in the 1559 edition (apparently with edits), which explicitly states that he is writing a brief (yes yes, different premodern standards) introduction to the Christian faith so that your average Christian can grasp the Bible better.
Also, I remain convinced that his sensus divinitatis is convoluted and unclear.
This is most emphatically NOT a systematic theology! Rather, Calvin kept his prefatory letter to the King of France of 1536 even in the 1559 edition (apparently with edits), which explicitly states that he is writing a brief (yes yes, different premodern standards) introduction to the Christian faith so that your average Christian can grasp the Bible better.
Also, I remain convinced that his sensus divinitatis is convoluted and unclear.
December 16, 2019
Life-changing. This was my second read through but I spent the entire year reading it this time. Every Christian should read this if for not other reason than to be forced to work through their theology. Calvin is so pastoral and encouraged me spiritually the whole year.
Four stars out of five just because Calvin gets repetitive at times.
Four stars out of five just because Calvin gets repetitive at times.
July 3, 2026
So good. Calvin writes both theologically and pastorally, and that's what makes this a worthwhile read. Some of the deficiencies in language that you find here are cleared up in the early modern period.
April 24, 2018
There is no author living or dead that I turn to with as much profit as Calvin. This is Calvin at his best. Clear, pastoral, mean at times, balanced where you don't expect him to be, covering a vast array of Christian theology, rooted in the church fathers, relevant even today, organized, on and on. It is in my top five theology books of all time. If you haven't read it you should.
January 12, 2009
I finished Volume 2 of the other edition in October of 1985. And Volume 1 of the other edition in October of 1984.Finished Volume 1 Battles some time in mid-2009, and Volume 2 on December 26, 2009. What a magnificent architectural achievement.
April 10, 2025
Seemed to start contradicting himself by the end. Calvin argues that the sacraments are a sealing of the promises offered to us in the gospel, yet infants can be baptized without any faith. I suspect that his anti-rationalist approach to God contributes to this tension. True, God cannot be fit into our heads but we should not dismiss objections by appealing to mystery. Faith is still comprehendible but through story, not blanket ignorance.
December 18, 2024
GOD BE PRAISED
June 8, 2021
One of the better books ever written!
April 4, 2026
Finally finished this key Reformed text after putting it down and picking it back up again several times.
I do consider myself Reformed, so, the four star rating may be surprising, but while this is such a well-loved text for Reformed theology, it suffers in a couple ways.
Firstly, what exactly is this work? Is it a systematic? A polemic? A polemical systematic? A series of sermons? The preface helps contextualize what it is: a primer to Protestant Christianity touching on all of the contemporary issues in the Protestant Reformation with polemical elements to prove the Protestant’s right to exist.
This works well on some issues and not so well on others. The polemical elements against Romanism I didn’t enjoy as much. While at times they’re informative, sometimes they feel a bit like rambling.
For better and more dispassionate polemical analysis of Roman Catholicism and Reformed Catholicism, I much prefer Louis Le Blanc’s “Theological Treatises” which I haven’t finished, but every time I am curious about the distinction, I reference and am quite enriched by.
Besides the polemics, this has some issues with being the first to market and being revised multiple times as far as a systematic of Refomed theology. At times, chapter organization is not very precise, some chapters could be split into different sections, and the arguments could use more precision.
Formatting aside which I’m sure changes depending on the translator, substantively, Calvin has some odd quirks which I think the later Reformed smooth out. The main one that wrinkles my nose a bit is his rejection of the distinction of God’s permissive will when it comes to reprobation. This has opened us up to critiques of equivalent ultimacy in the subject of double predestination ever since he wrote it. While the truth that the distinctive of permissive will lays out is still present in Calvin’s view (namely that man’s sin is the ultimate cause of his reprobation), his rejection of the term confuses the conversation.
Book II and IV are the books I found most helpful in this work, with IV being Calvin at his best. If you don’t have the interest in reading the entire work, I would recommend IV as the most insightful. It has some of his best polemics, his warmest writings, and some of the most interesting subjects like the sacraments and civil government.
It is also worth noting as an aside that while Calvin gets the credit in our time as being the great systematizer of the Reformation, it was really quite regional. For example, Vermigli and Bullinger were much more circulated in England.
I do consider myself Reformed, so, the four star rating may be surprising, but while this is such a well-loved text for Reformed theology, it suffers in a couple ways.
Firstly, what exactly is this work? Is it a systematic? A polemic? A polemical systematic? A series of sermons? The preface helps contextualize what it is: a primer to Protestant Christianity touching on all of the contemporary issues in the Protestant Reformation with polemical elements to prove the Protestant’s right to exist.
This works well on some issues and not so well on others. The polemical elements against Romanism I didn’t enjoy as much. While at times they’re informative, sometimes they feel a bit like rambling.
For better and more dispassionate polemical analysis of Roman Catholicism and Reformed Catholicism, I much prefer Louis Le Blanc’s “Theological Treatises” which I haven’t finished, but every time I am curious about the distinction, I reference and am quite enriched by.
Besides the polemics, this has some issues with being the first to market and being revised multiple times as far as a systematic of Refomed theology. At times, chapter organization is not very precise, some chapters could be split into different sections, and the arguments could use more precision.
Formatting aside which I’m sure changes depending on the translator, substantively, Calvin has some odd quirks which I think the later Reformed smooth out. The main one that wrinkles my nose a bit is his rejection of the distinction of God’s permissive will when it comes to reprobation. This has opened us up to critiques of equivalent ultimacy in the subject of double predestination ever since he wrote it. While the truth that the distinctive of permissive will lays out is still present in Calvin’s view (namely that man’s sin is the ultimate cause of his reprobation), his rejection of the term confuses the conversation.
Book II and IV are the books I found most helpful in this work, with IV being Calvin at his best. If you don’t have the interest in reading the entire work, I would recommend IV as the most insightful. It has some of his best polemics, his warmest writings, and some of the most interesting subjects like the sacraments and civil government.
It is also worth noting as an aside that while Calvin gets the credit in our time as being the great systematizer of the Reformation, it was really quite regional. For example, Vermigli and Bullinger were much more circulated in England.
June 2, 2019
Calvin wrote this tome to educate a king uneducated on the tenets of Christianity in the hopes that it would end persecution. I’m assuming Francis did not read it, but obviously many others have and have been influenced by Calvin’s theology.
The Institutes was carefully planned and executed, which is wonderful when you are looking to systematize something as complex as an entire religion. It was truly an accomplishment in this sense, I think. Within the work, Calvin’s determination to accept God on His own terms rather than personal desires was admirable. This attitude and humility towards God is very much needed today. However, I do think Calvin erred in his interpretation of Scripture.
Most notably and unsurprisingly, I disagreed with his ideas on the elect. I won’t pretend to give a defense of free will here when so many other, more qualified persons have done so (i.e. Alvin Plantinga), but I did think it was interesting that the idea of predestination did not seem to consistently run through the work. For example, he can be found exhorting believers to be careful lest they “fall away”. He also SAID that predestination does not lead to evil in God, but did not show it. In any case, his theological tundra left this reader cold.
As for his writing style, it was extremely straightforward. Again, this is great for systematic theology, but in my opinion it lacked an arresting style. It was harsh at points, which in fairness, was to be expected considering the large institution he was fighting, but tempered by grace could have been much more engaging. By point of contrast, though I also disagree with Augustine (whom he loves to quote) on the point of the elect, he managed to write in a most striking way. This was the tipping point for me from the 3.5 stars I would give this should there be half-star ratings. I will use this as reference in the future, but will not be rereading it for pleasure.
The Institutes was carefully planned and executed, which is wonderful when you are looking to systematize something as complex as an entire religion. It was truly an accomplishment in this sense, I think. Within the work, Calvin’s determination to accept God on His own terms rather than personal desires was admirable. This attitude and humility towards God is very much needed today. However, I do think Calvin erred in his interpretation of Scripture.
Most notably and unsurprisingly, I disagreed with his ideas on the elect. I won’t pretend to give a defense of free will here when so many other, more qualified persons have done so (i.e. Alvin Plantinga), but I did think it was interesting that the idea of predestination did not seem to consistently run through the work. For example, he can be found exhorting believers to be careful lest they “fall away”. He also SAID that predestination does not lead to evil in God, but did not show it. In any case, his theological tundra left this reader cold.
As for his writing style, it was extremely straightforward. Again, this is great for systematic theology, but in my opinion it lacked an arresting style. It was harsh at points, which in fairness, was to be expected considering the large institution he was fighting, but tempered by grace could have been much more engaging. By point of contrast, though I also disagree with Augustine (whom he loves to quote) on the point of the elect, he managed to write in a most striking way. This was the tipping point for me from the 3.5 stars I would give this should there be half-star ratings. I will use this as reference in the future, but will not be rereading it for pleasure.
July 10, 2024
There is good reason this classic continues 500 years later. I was particularly struck by Calvin's pastoral tone when addressing matters of the Christian lifestyle, including his wisdom related to matters of conscience and enjoying God's creation. Caricatures of Calvin the kill- joy are just that, fallacious caricatures.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 611 reviews