What do you think?
Rate this book
Wars of the Roses #1
Pássaro da Tempestade
Quando o rei Henrique VI enfim ocupa o trono da Inglaterra, todo o reino é abalado. Sua fraqueza de saúde e de espírito é notória na corte, e, dessa forma, é responsabilidade de seus homens de confiança garantir a segurança da Coroa. A pedido de Henrique, o espiãomor Derry Brewer e William de la Pole, duque de Suffolk, propõem um armistício com a França através de um casamento arranjado com Margarida de Anjou, jovem da nobreza francesa. Porém, nem todos veem esse acordo com bons olhos, e assim nasce uma conspiração, liderada por Ricardo Plantageneta, duque de York, que deseja destronar o rei e ocupar seu lugar. É o início de um período sangrento na Inglaterra, uma guerra civil com alianças e traições na qual a morte está sempre à espreita.
406 pages, Paperback
First published October 10, 2013
1862 people are currently reading
16324 people want to read
About the author
Conn Iggulden
141 books5,992 followersAlso publishes under author name C.F. Iggulden.
I was born in the normal way in 1971, and vaguely remember half-pennies and sixpences. I have written for as long as I can remember: poetry, short stories and novels. It’s what I always wanted to do and read English at London University with writing in mind. I taught English for seven years and was Head of English at St. Gregory’s RC High School in London by the end of that period. I have enormous respect for those who still labour at the chalk-face. In truth, I can’t find it in me to miss the grind of paperwork and initiatives. I do miss the camaraderie of the smokers’ room, as well as the lessons where their faces lit up as they understood what I was wittering on about.
My mother is Irish and from an early age she told me history as an exciting series of stories – with dates. My great-grandfather was a Seannachie, so I suppose story-telling is in the genes somewhere. My father flew in Bomber Command in WWII, then taught maths and science. Perhaps crucially, he also loved poetry and cracking good tales. Though it seems a dated idea now, I began teaching when boys were told only girls were good at English, despite the great names that must spring to mind after that statement. My father loved working with wood and equations, but he also recited ‘Vitai Lampada’ with a gleam in his eye and that matters, frankly.
I’ve always loved historical fiction as a genre and cut my teeth on Hornblower and Tai-Pan, Flashman, Sharpe and Jack Aubrey. I still remember the sheer joy of reading my first Patrick O’Brian book and discovering there were nineteen more in the series. I love just about anything by David Gemmell, or Peter F. Hamilton or Wilbur Smith. I suppose the one thing that links all those is the love of a good tale.
That’s about it for the moment. If you’d like to get in touch with me leave a comment in the forum or you can tweet me @Conn_Iggulden. I’ll leave it there for the moment. If you’ve read my books, you know an awful lot about the way I think already. There’s no point overdoing it.
Conn Iggulden
I was born in the normal way in 1971, and vaguely remember half-pennies and sixpences. I have written for as long as I can remember: poetry, short stories and novels. It’s what I always wanted to do and read English at London University with writing in mind. I taught English for seven years and was Head of English at St. Gregory’s RC High School in London by the end of that period. I have enormous respect for those who still labour at the chalk-face. In truth, I can’t find it in me to miss the grind of paperwork and initiatives. I do miss the camaraderie of the smokers’ room, as well as the lessons where their faces lit up as they understood what I was wittering on about.
My mother is Irish and from an early age she told me history as an exciting series of stories – with dates. My great-grandfather was a Seannachie, so I suppose story-telling is in the genes somewhere. My father flew in Bomber Command in WWII, then taught maths and science. Perhaps crucially, he also loved poetry and cracking good tales. Though it seems a dated idea now, I began teaching when boys were told only girls were good at English, despite the great names that must spring to mind after that statement. My father loved working with wood and equations, but he also recited ‘Vitai Lampada’ with a gleam in his eye and that matters, frankly.
I’ve always loved historical fiction as a genre and cut my teeth on Hornblower and Tai-Pan, Flashman, Sharpe and Jack Aubrey. I still remember the sheer joy of reading my first Patrick O’Brian book and discovering there were nineteen more in the series. I love just about anything by David Gemmell, or Peter F. Hamilton or Wilbur Smith. I suppose the one thing that links all those is the love of a good tale.
That’s about it for the moment. If you’d like to get in touch with me leave a comment in the forum or you can tweet me @Conn_Iggulden. I’ll leave it there for the moment. If you’ve read my books, you know an awful lot about the way I think already. There’s no point overdoing it.
Conn Iggulden
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 1,359 reviews
June 13, 2016
I think the style of Iggulden’s writing made this novel what it is. He shows us each character’s situation in a manner that suggests that there is no right or wrong. Both sides of the war had a reason to fight, and the author’s portrays this is a completely neutral manner; thus, he leaves it up to the reader to decide if they follow the white rose or the red rose into battle, and the nest of court politics. Personally, I was rooting for the house of York. Duke Richard only wanted what was best for his country.
An array of characters
Iggulden doesn’t just show us the conflict from the perspective of nobles and Kings; he also shows us it from the point of view of a common solider, and the Lancastrian Court’s spider. This, for me, made the story quite strong because we got to see how the decisions made by the ruling class affected those in the ranks of the army. Indeed, Henry VI decides to give up his lands in France, so the English settlers are forced to flee their homesteads from the incoming French. He intended the decision to lead to peace, but instead many of his subjects were slaughtered. I don’t think him and Derry thought if through properly. He’s not the best King, and should have used York as his strong right hand in this. But, that’s just historical speculation.
“No congratulations?’ Derry said cheerfully. ‘No “well done, Derry”? I am disappointed in you, William Pole. There’s not many men could have pulled this off in such a time, but I have, haven’t I? The French looked for foxes and found only innocent chickens, just like we wanted. The marriage will go ahead and all we need to do now is mention casually to the English living in Maine and Anjou that their service is no longer appreciated by the Crown. In short, that they can fuck off.”
His wife is just as bad, historically speaking again. But, in this novel I did come to sympathise with her. A large proportion of it is given over to her story; it’s more her book than any one else’s. She was, undeniably, a strong woman. She had to be for her husband; she was the strength behind the red rose. Her husband goes into a catatonic state and she, his young and foreign queen, is left holding the reins of power. To her mind, she must act fast if her husband’s dynasty is to survive. I only wish she could have seen York for what he was. I think Iggulden has really got into the minds of these historical figures, and tried to explain, in a fictional sense, the reasoning behind their actions.
Some men aren’t meant to be Kings
It is no surprise that Henry VI is seen as a weak King by the English; it is no surprise that his nobles wanted a stronger man to lead them. When the King enters his catatonic state they have their perfect opportunity. History can’t blame them too much. They simply wanted a better leader not one who surrender hard won land in France; they wanted a man like Henry Bolingbroke or his son: they wanted the house of York. Though, the ultimate climax of this is still a few books away. The surrendering or French soil is seen through the eyes of an English archer who has settled with his family. What he sees makes the King’s decisions seem ever weaker and born from pure fear, ultimately, providing more reason to prefer the Yorkist leaders.
I think the series has a lot of potential, but I do hope the author shifts to some new point of view characters as the war develops. Whilst I enjoyed Margaret of Anjou as a narrator, I do think he will have to move away from her as her centrality of English politics begins to diminish with the new York reign. Well, it depends how far this series goes. Also, at his point, I do hope this series ends at a strong point of the conflict because at the moment I can’t really see at what point on the timeline it could be concluded.
War of the Roses series:
1. Stormbird- An interesting four stars
2. Trinity A bloody four stars
3. Bloodline- A strong four stars
An array of characters
Iggulden doesn’t just show us the conflict from the perspective of nobles and Kings; he also shows us it from the point of view of a common solider, and the Lancastrian Court’s spider. This, for me, made the story quite strong because we got to see how the decisions made by the ruling class affected those in the ranks of the army. Indeed, Henry VI decides to give up his lands in France, so the English settlers are forced to flee their homesteads from the incoming French. He intended the decision to lead to peace, but instead many of his subjects were slaughtered. I don’t think him and Derry thought if through properly. He’s not the best King, and should have used York as his strong right hand in this. But, that’s just historical speculation.
“No congratulations?’ Derry said cheerfully. ‘No “well done, Derry”? I am disappointed in you, William Pole. There’s not many men could have pulled this off in such a time, but I have, haven’t I? The French looked for foxes and found only innocent chickens, just like we wanted. The marriage will go ahead and all we need to do now is mention casually to the English living in Maine and Anjou that their service is no longer appreciated by the Crown. In short, that they can fuck off.”
His wife is just as bad, historically speaking again. But, in this novel I did come to sympathise with her. A large proportion of it is given over to her story; it’s more her book than any one else’s. She was, undeniably, a strong woman. She had to be for her husband; she was the strength behind the red rose. Her husband goes into a catatonic state and she, his young and foreign queen, is left holding the reins of power. To her mind, she must act fast if her husband’s dynasty is to survive. I only wish she could have seen York for what he was. I think Iggulden has really got into the minds of these historical figures, and tried to explain, in a fictional sense, the reasoning behind their actions.
Some men aren’t meant to be Kings
It is no surprise that Henry VI is seen as a weak King by the English; it is no surprise that his nobles wanted a stronger man to lead them. When the King enters his catatonic state they have their perfect opportunity. History can’t blame them too much. They simply wanted a better leader not one who surrender hard won land in France; they wanted a man like Henry Bolingbroke or his son: they wanted the house of York. Though, the ultimate climax of this is still a few books away. The surrendering or French soil is seen through the eyes of an English archer who has settled with his family. What he sees makes the King’s decisions seem ever weaker and born from pure fear, ultimately, providing more reason to prefer the Yorkist leaders.
I think the series has a lot of potential, but I do hope the author shifts to some new point of view characters as the war develops. Whilst I enjoyed Margaret of Anjou as a narrator, I do think he will have to move away from her as her centrality of English politics begins to diminish with the new York reign. Well, it depends how far this series goes. Also, at his point, I do hope this series ends at a strong point of the conflict because at the moment I can’t really see at what point on the timeline it could be concluded.
War of the Roses series:
1. Stormbird- An interesting four stars
2. Trinity A bloody four stars
3. Bloodline- A strong four stars
July 25, 2019
If you like Historical Fiction, Conn Iggulden is your man.
September 4, 2014
While this novel is purported to be about the Wars of the Roses, Mr. Iggulden has set it in the time of the fall of the English Kingdom of France in the late 1440s and the civil unrest that followed. That said he introduces many of the real life characters that rose to prominence during those wars. They include Richard of York, descended on both sides from Edward III and father of the later Yorkist Kings, the reigning King - Henry VI and his wife Margret of Anjou, and the Neville family – including the man who would become known as the Kingmaker.
In telling his story, the author has created a couple of fascinating fictional characters. The first is Derry Brewer, who is the King’s spymaster and all around fix it man. His sole desire is to serve the king and accomplish the King’s desires no matter what it costs the Kingdom in general or him personally. Another gripping character is Thomas Woodchurch, an English settler in the county of Maine and an old companion of Derry. Mr. Iggulden uses these two characters to illustrate what the loss of England’s French possessions cost the common man.
In telling the story of the Nobles – Richard of York is presented as very ambitious and slightly menacing, his wife equally so. Henry is a good but weak, both physically and mentally. His desire for peace at any cost is presented as playing into the French hands and directly leading to the loss of Normandy. The Duke of Suffolk is the scape goat for the loss of Normandy and is presented as one who has no greater ambitions and is just trying to do his duty to his King and Country. The Neville’s, allies of York, are also presented as ambitious and willing to do whatever it takes to make those ambitions come to pass. All this ambition is presented as a desire to do the best for England, who they feel needs a strong King.
Mr. Iggulden uses Thomas Woodchurch and his family to tell the story of the disposition of the English settlers in France when their homes are given to France in the marriage treaty between Henry and Margret and the resulting truce. To say they didn’t accept it willingly is to understate the events. There rebellion is well told and as well as their frustration with the Nobility.
Finally the author tells us the story of Jack Cade’s rebellion. A peasent uprising starting in Kent, this was probably the most successful of the many rebellions that occurred at the time. Cade is known to Thomas from his time in the army and Thomas is coopted into helping Cade turn his rabble into an actual fighting force. I found their story compelling. In this story Henry’s Queen is shown in a very heroic light.
From the beginning of the book, in Edward III’s death chamber thru to the end of the book where Richard of York accepts the regency of England, I found this a very entertaining read – solid 4 stars for me
In telling his story, the author has created a couple of fascinating fictional characters. The first is Derry Brewer, who is the King’s spymaster and all around fix it man. His sole desire is to serve the king and accomplish the King’s desires no matter what it costs the Kingdom in general or him personally. Another gripping character is Thomas Woodchurch, an English settler in the county of Maine and an old companion of Derry. Mr. Iggulden uses these two characters to illustrate what the loss of England’s French possessions cost the common man.
In telling the story of the Nobles – Richard of York is presented as very ambitious and slightly menacing, his wife equally so. Henry is a good but weak, both physically and mentally. His desire for peace at any cost is presented as playing into the French hands and directly leading to the loss of Normandy. The Duke of Suffolk is the scape goat for the loss of Normandy and is presented as one who has no greater ambitions and is just trying to do his duty to his King and Country. The Neville’s, allies of York, are also presented as ambitious and willing to do whatever it takes to make those ambitions come to pass. All this ambition is presented as a desire to do the best for England, who they feel needs a strong King.
Mr. Iggulden uses Thomas Woodchurch and his family to tell the story of the disposition of the English settlers in France when their homes are given to France in the marriage treaty between Henry and Margret and the resulting truce. To say they didn’t accept it willingly is to understate the events. There rebellion is well told and as well as their frustration with the Nobility.
Finally the author tells us the story of Jack Cade’s rebellion. A peasent uprising starting in Kent, this was probably the most successful of the many rebellions that occurred at the time. Cade is known to Thomas from his time in the army and Thomas is coopted into helping Cade turn his rabble into an actual fighting force. I found their story compelling. In this story Henry’s Queen is shown in a very heroic light.
From the beginning of the book, in Edward III’s death chamber thru to the end of the book where Richard of York accepts the regency of England, I found this a very entertaining read – solid 4 stars for me
June 4, 2020
Este autor constituye mi mejor descubrimiento de Novela Histórica durante 2019. No lo había leído hasta que tropecé con esta Tetralogía sobre la Guerra de las dos Rosas. Este libro es el primero de la serie.
De Enrique VI de Lancaster a Enrique VII, primer rey de la Disnastía Tudor en Inglaterra, constituye el convulso periodo histórico que comprende esta serie de Novelas.
Joder qué lío! Si no eres medianamente conocedor de todas las ramas nobiliarias que descienden de Eduardo III, como era mi caso, y que durante estos años se enfrentan y se mezclan unos con otros, el lío es monumental: que si la casa de York, que si los Lancaster, que si los Beaufort, luego aparecen los Neville, los Warwick. Cuesta aclararse y hay que volver una y otra vez a la genealogía, para seguir el hilo.......pero merece la pena, rigor histórico, personajes interesantes y bien caracterizados, los históricos y los inventados. Episodios bélicos, que hay muchos, bien narrados, algunos en los siguientes libros de forma brillante, desde mi punto de vista.
Considero que la serie va in crescendo a medida que avanzamos en la tetralogía, y este sirve un poco de preámbulo a la guerra que se desencadenará en los siguientes.
Empieza el reinado del desafortunado Enrique VI, rey débil, quizá marcado por el carácter de su padre, el triunfador de Azincourt y también usurpador de la Corona, tras derrocar a Ricardo II, hijo del primogénito de Eduardo III, el Príncipe Negro, acontecimiento que es el verdadero desencadenante de la Guerra de las Rosas.
El rey es débil, las posesiones en Francia están en peligro, pactos, concesiones, huida de los colonos ingleses en territorio francés, desórdenes civiles, intrigas, una reina francesa para pactar la paz con Francia, que será una reina fuerte y el verdadero soporte que permite mantenerse al rey y a sus partidarios durante muchos años.
Merece especial atención la semblanza que se hace del cuerpo de élite más importante de Europa durante varios siglos, hasta que las armas de fuego empiezan a ser verdaderamente efectivas: El arquero inglés portador del arco largo. Este cuerpo de arqueros decidió muchas batallas durante la Guerra de los 100 años y causaba verdadero pavor entre los caballeros acorazados franceses, ya que sus armaduras eran ineficientes y caían como moscas ante sus flechas. Estos arqueros eran cuidados con mimo, eran escasos, formar a un arquero capaz de manejar estas armas con precisión y con la cadencia de tiro infernal que alcanzaban solo se conseguía entrenando a diario y desde la infancia, de hecho un rey inglés (Eduardo I), prohibió todos los deportes salvo el tiro con arco para promover esta práctica entre sus súbditos. Cualquier pérdida de estos soldados en batalla constituía para los ingleses, siempre en minoría numérica, una pérdida irreemplazable.
Dejémenos de Juego de tronos y leamos sobre la Guerra de las dos Rosas, la verdadera Historia es la más interesante...
De Enrique VI de Lancaster a Enrique VII, primer rey de la Disnastía Tudor en Inglaterra, constituye el convulso periodo histórico que comprende esta serie de Novelas.
Joder qué lío! Si no eres medianamente conocedor de todas las ramas nobiliarias que descienden de Eduardo III, como era mi caso, y que durante estos años se enfrentan y se mezclan unos con otros, el lío es monumental: que si la casa de York, que si los Lancaster, que si los Beaufort, luego aparecen los Neville, los Warwick. Cuesta aclararse y hay que volver una y otra vez a la genealogía, para seguir el hilo.......pero merece la pena, rigor histórico, personajes interesantes y bien caracterizados, los históricos y los inventados. Episodios bélicos, que hay muchos, bien narrados, algunos en los siguientes libros de forma brillante, desde mi punto de vista.
Considero que la serie va in crescendo a medida que avanzamos en la tetralogía, y este sirve un poco de preámbulo a la guerra que se desencadenará en los siguientes.
Empieza el reinado del desafortunado Enrique VI, rey débil, quizá marcado por el carácter de su padre, el triunfador de Azincourt y también usurpador de la Corona, tras derrocar a Ricardo II, hijo del primogénito de Eduardo III, el Príncipe Negro, acontecimiento que es el verdadero desencadenante de la Guerra de las Rosas.
El rey es débil, las posesiones en Francia están en peligro, pactos, concesiones, huida de los colonos ingleses en territorio francés, desórdenes civiles, intrigas, una reina francesa para pactar la paz con Francia, que será una reina fuerte y el verdadero soporte que permite mantenerse al rey y a sus partidarios durante muchos años.
Merece especial atención la semblanza que se hace del cuerpo de élite más importante de Europa durante varios siglos, hasta que las armas de fuego empiezan a ser verdaderamente efectivas: El arquero inglés portador del arco largo. Este cuerpo de arqueros decidió muchas batallas durante la Guerra de los 100 años y causaba verdadero pavor entre los caballeros acorazados franceses, ya que sus armaduras eran ineficientes y caían como moscas ante sus flechas. Estos arqueros eran cuidados con mimo, eran escasos, formar a un arquero capaz de manejar estas armas con precisión y con la cadencia de tiro infernal que alcanzaban solo se conseguía entrenando a diario y desde la infancia, de hecho un rey inglés (Eduardo I), prohibió todos los deportes salvo el tiro con arco para promover esta práctica entre sus súbditos. Cualquier pérdida de estos soldados en batalla constituía para los ingleses, siempre en minoría numérica, una pérdida irreemplazable.
Dejémenos de Juego de tronos y leamos sobre la Guerra de las dos Rosas, la verdadera Historia es la más interesante...
June 22, 2025
Интересен роман, в който са описани причините за избухването на по късно известната като "Войната на розите" гражданска война, преобърнала реда и кралските династии в средновековна Англия.
Книгата е добре написана, чете се относително бързо и в края ѝ има подробна справка от автора, за това какви волности си е позволил по историческите факти и герои от епохата (не са много).
Наследникът на трона, младият крал Хенри VI е болнав и със слаба воля. Неспособността му да управлява голямата английска империя настройва срещу него бедни и богати. Загубата на почти всички владения във Франция е голям удар върху прословутата английска гордост и поставя горчив за англичаните край на Стогодишната война.
Същевременно, селско въстание оглавено от някой си Джак Кейд бушува без да срещне сериозна съпротива и дори Лондон е нападнат от селяците!
В такива условия изгрява звездата на херцога на Йорк, безскрупулен и алчен за власт могъщ благородник, чието регентство ще разпали ужасяващия и кървав конфликт, продължил десетки години.
От четирилогията на Кон Игълдън на български към този момент са преведени първите три книги.
Книгата е добре написана, чете се относително бързо и в края ѝ има подробна справка от автора, за това какви волности си е позволил по историческите факти и герои от епохата (не са много).
Наследникът на трона, младият крал Хенри VI е болнав и със слаба воля. Неспособността му да управлява голямата английска империя настройва срещу него бедни и богати. Загубата на почти всички владения във Франция е голям удар върху прословутата английска гордост и поставя горчив за англичаните край на Стогодишната война.
Същевременно, селско въстание оглавено от някой си Джак Кейд бушува без да срещне сериозна съпротива и дори Лондон е нападнат от селяците!
В такива условия изгрява звездата на херцога на Йорк, безскрупулен и алчен за власт могъщ благородник, чието регентство ще разпали ужасяващия и кървав конфликт, продължил десетки години.
От четирилогията на Кон Игълдън на български към този момент са преведени първите три книги.
August 29, 2023
Read a few books by this author and enjoyed them. But they were set in Roman times. The 100 years war is not a period of history in which I am familiar. My A level history covered 1845-1939 so was a tad focussed and unrelated. Whilst I have read a lot about the Roman era.
That said this first book in a series ( yes I managed to start at the beginning) was extremely interesting and galloped along. King Henry VI takes the throne but is a sick young man and does not have much support. He marries Margaret of Anjou, a young girl of 14. But who grows into a strong woman.
The characters in the story are well rounded. I liked the spymaster Derihew Brewer - a real slimey schemer but loyal to King and Queen. Reading the book I found myself flitting to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, this tipped me off about Lord Suffolk and John Cade ( led a revolt of Kentish men who even stormed the Tower of London).
The battle scenes are graphic. I take my hat off to Conn Iggulden for writing a great book and kicking me off to finish the series.
That said this first book in a series ( yes I managed to start at the beginning) was extremely interesting and galloped along. King Henry VI takes the throne but is a sick young man and does not have much support. He marries Margaret of Anjou, a young girl of 14. But who grows into a strong woman.
The characters in the story are well rounded. I liked the spymaster Derihew Brewer - a real slimey schemer but loyal to King and Queen. Reading the book I found myself flitting to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, this tipped me off about Lord Suffolk and John Cade ( led a revolt of Kentish men who even stormed the Tower of London).
The battle scenes are graphic. I take my hat off to Conn Iggulden for writing a great book and kicking me off to finish the series.
April 27, 2021
The book is readable and very easy to get into because of the fluid pace and style, but lacks substance. It's a "light" type of plotting that doesn't care much for accuracy nor invests much in characterisation.
It had a curious, and irritating, authorial choice related to addressing lords in a way that wasn't the fashion back then, like calling Richard, Duke of York simply "Lord York," or "Lord Suffolk" for William, Duke of Suffolk. It'd be easy to overlook, but Iggulden continues with the misnoming choices by continually referring to people with their full title as if it were their names, often eliminating the "of" particle, like Earl Warwick, Earl Salisbury, etc. I'm sure many won't mind, but for me it was jarring, and I had to make a conscious effort to stay immersed every time this and similar choices popped up.
As a positive point, though, I'd mention the side plot of the Maine settlers' rebellion, when as a result of the Henry VI/Margaret of Anjou marital alliance, the territories of Anjou and Maine are handed back to France. But the English settlers won't give up their hard-won lands without a fight, and fight they do. It's a hopeless cause, of course, and it was interesting to see that little known part of the pre-Wars of the Roses period in a novel. It's not often that you see conflicts from the viewpoint of the commonfolk who pay for the political games of the powerful. Thomas Woodchurch was definitely a good addition to the novel.
There's not much more I could say about this, it's a first installment in a longish series, and it does show because a lot is left underdeveloped or hanging out there by a cliff so you go pick the next book up. Is it worth it? Moderately so. I'd not recommend this for your Priority Reading pile, more for one of those days when you feel like reading anything light and not too demanding.
It had a curious, and irritating, authorial choice related to addressing lords in a way that wasn't the fashion back then, like calling Richard, Duke of York simply "Lord York," or "Lord Suffolk" for William, Duke of Suffolk. It'd be easy to overlook, but Iggulden continues with the misnoming choices by continually referring to people with their full title as if it were their names, often eliminating the "of" particle, like Earl Warwick, Earl Salisbury, etc. I'm sure many won't mind, but for me it was jarring, and I had to make a conscious effort to stay immersed every time this and similar choices popped up.
As a positive point, though, I'd mention the side plot of the Maine settlers' rebellion, when as a result of the Henry VI/Margaret of Anjou marital alliance, the territories of Anjou and Maine are handed back to France. But the English settlers won't give up their hard-won lands without a fight, and fight they do. It's a hopeless cause, of course, and it was interesting to see that little known part of the pre-Wars of the Roses period in a novel. It's not often that you see conflicts from the viewpoint of the commonfolk who pay for the political games of the powerful. Thomas Woodchurch was definitely a good addition to the novel.
There's not much more I could say about this, it's a first installment in a longish series, and it does show because a lot is left underdeveloped or hanging out there by a cliff so you go pick the next book up. Is it worth it? Moderately so. I'd not recommend this for your Priority Reading pile, more for one of those days when you feel like reading anything light and not too demanding.
September 17, 2016
This is the first novel in the “War of the Roses” series by Conn Iggulden.
The author skillfully weaves the bodacious actions of two main fictitious characters (Derry Brewer, the King’s spymaster, and Thomas Woodchurch, a commoner living in Maine, France) with some pivotal historical events that took place under the reign of Henry VI of England.
Part One deals with Derry Brewer’s political machinations initiated on Henry’s behalf with the aim of bringing about a lasting truce with France. He throws into the bargain England’s two French possessions, Anjou and Maine, and an offer for Henry to marry the French King’s (Charles VII) niece, Margaret of Anjou.
Part Two tells the outrage felt by many English subjects who have lived all their lives in Maine and Anjou. Their riotous reaction to the English Crown giving up those lands is seen through the eyes of an archer-turned-merchant Thomas Woodchurch, who decides to lead a resistance movement in order to thwart the French army’s taking possession of the two towns. His attempt fails in the end. The English loses not only Maine and Anjou, but also Normandy.
Part Three describes the infamous Jack Cade’s rebellion in London amidst widespread grievances in society over official corruption and the weakness of Henry VI in the face of an ever strengthening France. It sets the stage for Duke of York's throne-claiming ambitions to play out.
All in all, the plot is a gripping one and the writing flawless, especially in the movie-like description of the battle scenes. However, I personally find it a bit hard to relate to the two fictitious characters. I’m giving this novel 3.5 stars out of 5.
January 6, 2024
(1.1) I don't know much shit about British history, so I will try to see how far I can go with this book.
(1.2) I also tried to look 'Wars of the Roses' up on Wiki, but it's already a struggle just trying to understand who is who, and who is fighting who, which family is involved. LOL
(1.3) I don't understand how Henry VI can be the MC in this thick novel, maybe the story will focus more on his wife, Marguerite d'Anjou?
(1.4) Now I remember I had watched The King on Netflix (because I like handsome guys as much as anyone else), the movie is about Henry V and he is Henry VI's dad exactly!!! LOL
(2) He had never doubted for a moment that his enemies would receive the same punishment.
Now it's getting good...At first, I didn't think I would care about this Reuben character, now that I do!!!
(3) I don't think the resistance has any chance of winning...I wonder how the author will write this part...it is also curious how the author would handle writing a bunch of main characters who do not look very heroic or capable right now...I mean, so far it's very hard to relate to Henry VI. *grins*
(4) The entire French army and a pissed-off French King! LOL
(5) I like how the main characters are flawed and they are not super smart like some brilliant masterminds, they made mistakes and they didn't get the upper hand for many times, it makes them a lot more human.
Review for book 2: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
(1.2) I also tried to look 'Wars of the Roses' up on Wiki, but it's already a struggle just trying to understand who is who, and who is fighting who, which family is involved. LOL
(1.3) I don't understand how Henry VI can be the MC in this thick novel, maybe the story will focus more on his wife, Marguerite d'Anjou?
(1.4) Now I remember I had watched The King on Netflix (because I like handsome guys as much as anyone else), the movie is about Henry V and he is Henry VI's dad exactly!!! LOL
(2) He had never doubted for a moment that his enemies would receive the same punishment.
Now it's getting good...At first, I didn't think I would care about this Reuben character, now that I do!!!
(3) I don't think the resistance has any chance of winning...I wonder how the author will write this part...it is also curious how the author would handle writing a bunch of main characters who do not look very heroic or capable right now...I mean, so far it's very hard to relate to Henry VI. *grins*
(4) The entire French army and a pissed-off French King! LOL
(5) I like how the main characters are flawed and they are not super smart like some brilliant masterminds, they made mistakes and they didn't get the upper hand for many times, it makes them a lot more human.
Review for book 2: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
November 17, 2021
Read this book in 2013, and its the 1st volume of the "Wars Of The Roses" series.
King Henry, the Lion of England is long dead, and his son Henry VI coming of age and taking the throne in AD 1437.
Although very frail in body and mind, he will seek for supporters to help him rule his Kingdom.
On the hand there's, Richard, Duke of York, starkly opposed to this weak King, and he will start spreading unrest and rebellion at home, in an attempt to destabilise his King.
In the meantime young King Henry VI marries Princess Margaret of Anjou in an attempt to forge an alliance with France.
Will this marriage save the King and his Kingdom, or will it be too late, because storm clous are gathering and soon the vultures are attacking the King and Queen from abroad and at home.
What is to follow is an very intriguing and marvellous tale of Kingship, power, loyalty, treachery and death, and in this circumstances King Henry VI must somehow seem to survive, and although supported by his very strong wife Queen Margaret, this King due to his ill health, he will feel the strain and hardships of being a King, resulting in his downfall.
Highly recommended, for this is a tremendous opener of this amazing series, and that's why I like to call this episode: "A Wonderful Wars Of The Roses Begin"!
King Henry, the Lion of England is long dead, and his son Henry VI coming of age and taking the throne in AD 1437.
Although very frail in body and mind, he will seek for supporters to help him rule his Kingdom.
On the hand there's, Richard, Duke of York, starkly opposed to this weak King, and he will start spreading unrest and rebellion at home, in an attempt to destabilise his King.
In the meantime young King Henry VI marries Princess Margaret of Anjou in an attempt to forge an alliance with France.
Will this marriage save the King and his Kingdom, or will it be too late, because storm clous are gathering and soon the vultures are attacking the King and Queen from abroad and at home.
What is to follow is an very intriguing and marvellous tale of Kingship, power, loyalty, treachery and death, and in this circumstances King Henry VI must somehow seem to survive, and although supported by his very strong wife Queen Margaret, this King due to his ill health, he will feel the strain and hardships of being a King, resulting in his downfall.
Highly recommended, for this is a tremendous opener of this amazing series, and that's why I like to call this episode: "A Wonderful Wars Of The Roses Begin"!
September 16, 2016
Finally, I settled to read some Conn Iggulden - best seller of HF, UK writer so shouldn't get too annoyed by the vernacular (as can happen when glaring misnomens happen). Experienced writer so new series beginning should be at the top of his powers.
Absolutely dreadful.
Including the misnomen issue. Lord York? Tut.
Characterisation = caricature or possibly cartoon. Gratuitous violence and torture. Pointless side stories.
Drat! Such promising material too! And reading the author's note, well-researched (even if I didn't agree with some of his conclusions). Henry VI is not written about enough and is such an interesting character because of his mental instability - as is Margaret, his wife. What a waste and how disappointing. It's another Robyn Young situation......
Absolutely dreadful.
Including the misnomen issue. Lord York? Tut.
Characterisation = caricature or possibly cartoon. Gratuitous violence and torture. Pointless side stories.
Drat! Such promising material too! And reading the author's note, well-researched (even if I didn't agree with some of his conclusions). Henry VI is not written about enough and is such an interesting character because of his mental instability - as is Margaret, his wife. What a waste and how disappointing. It's another Robyn Young situation......
January 3, 2014
Yeah..... Well it's like this.....Hmmmmm...... What to make of it really is the fact of the matter.
For one, if you should accept this challenge (War of the Roses) then you're in it for the longhaul as this book jus stops. no cliffhangers here! I found it started very well & the opening exchanges between the factions were entertaining & incitefull as to the period & the beginnings of the War of the Roses & then well..... it got a little disjointed as no sooner you were warming to a thread/characters then it jumped elsewhere, partly related to the ongoing plot but in others (MOSTLY) I thought... not really... before it finally settled into a rythem again & focused on the central theme as opposed to a few inane tangents in the middle third of the book.
It's a bit tame in respect to his Genghis series which i loved (first 3 books) but then again this was Jolly ol' England - tea anyone? Cucumber sandwiches? so maybe it fits more with the style but maybe not.......? - an example being - the spymaster character of Derihew Brewer - started of with bravado when facing down the Duke of York (Boo hiss!) as expected & spoke of guile & politics but as the story evolved his character was far from it, lacked depth for sure & in truth was quite guileless & like a lost boy throughout - there are other examples of this - it's almost like? In order to get everything into the book the author has skimmed & sacrificed some of the depth of character/detail of plot in places. However Queen Margaret was very detailed & a good character too.
I guess I was expecting more? I read from someone that ito it was his best book to date whilst others haven't like it at all. Me - It's a slow burner for sure & like a fire it fizzles & spits occasionally & then on goes a big log..... will it take & blaze away OR will it jus fizzle out.....?
Hence the mark due to the above analogy, as it truth it flares from a 3.5 to a 2.
For one, if you should accept this challenge (War of the Roses) then you're in it for the longhaul as this book jus stops. no cliffhangers here! I found it started very well & the opening exchanges between the factions were entertaining & incitefull as to the period & the beginnings of the War of the Roses & then well..... it got a little disjointed as no sooner you were warming to a thread/characters then it jumped elsewhere, partly related to the ongoing plot but in others (MOSTLY) I thought... not really... before it finally settled into a rythem again & focused on the central theme as opposed to a few inane tangents in the middle third of the book.
It's a bit tame in respect to his Genghis series which i loved (first 3 books) but then again this was Jolly ol' England - tea anyone? Cucumber sandwiches? so maybe it fits more with the style but maybe not.......? - an example being - the spymaster character of Derihew Brewer - started of with bravado when facing down the Duke of York (Boo hiss!) as expected & spoke of guile & politics but as the story evolved his character was far from it, lacked depth for sure & in truth was quite guileless & like a lost boy throughout - there are other examples of this - it's almost like? In order to get everything into the book the author has skimmed & sacrificed some of the depth of character/detail of plot in places. However Queen Margaret was very detailed & a good character too.
I guess I was expecting more? I read from someone that ito it was his best book to date whilst others haven't like it at all. Me - It's a slow burner for sure & like a fire it fizzles & spits occasionally & then on goes a big log..... will it take & blaze away OR will it jus fizzle out.....?
Hence the mark due to the above analogy, as it truth it flares from a 3.5 to a 2.
February 5, 2017
E. P. I. C. In every sense. Awesome battles, great plot and near accurate history. Conn Iggulden gave a great story on the War of Roses. I couldn't stop once I started to turn the pages.
The story is of the historical war between two noble houses of England . The House of Lancaster and the House of York. The famous rift that was known as the War of Roses. Which in turn inspired the very famous George R. R. Martin's A Song of Ice and Fire.
England was ruled by the once fierce warrior king, Edward the Third, the victor of the legendary battle of Agincourt. The king is old and in his death bed. His five sons are Edward, the Black Prince, Lionel, John of Gaunt, Edmund, Duke of York, and Thomas of Woodstock. After King Edward's death, his grandson, son of Edward, is crowned king, as Richard the Second. He is deposed by Henry of Bolingbroke, King Henry the Fourth. Thus starts the Royal Line of Lancaster.
In 1443, a righteous and honorable English nobleman, William de la Pole, meets with the English spymaster, Derihew Brewer, to arrange peace between England and France. The English King, Richard IV, is a frail and sick man, and demands peace. The bride in question is Margaret, the second daughter of The Count of Anjou, Renee. The agreements to this marraige is the lands claimed by England on French soils be returned to the King of France.
War breaks out in Normandy, as many fleeing farmers rebel against the French who come to evict them. One of them is Thomas Woodchruch, as former archer. He had long lived in his lands in France, and didn't like to get evicted. He leads a band of rebels who ambush and attack the French armies. But he is outnumbered and at last has to flee.
While in England, Margaret becomes a very faithful and loyal wife to Richard, who is ailing. The Duke of York, Richard, has long eyed the throne of England, and finds ways to plot against the King. York's leadership in France is taken away and given to William de la Pole, who tries in vain to defend the French land.
The fleeing people from France cause a discontent in the common folk of England. From this rises a rebel. Jack Cade. Along with two of his best friends, he forms a band of armed farmers, who then march all the way to London, and sack it.
William de la Pole, is arrested and taken for torture, when King Richard IV with persuasive help from Margaret, saves William. But he is banished from England, to live the rest of his life in France. During his journey to France, he is waylaid by a pirate ship, commissioned by Richard, who kill William.
Conn Iggulden's Waf of Roses series of Historical fiction, is a very fine series to read.
The story is of the historical war between two noble houses of England . The House of Lancaster and the House of York. The famous rift that was known as the War of Roses. Which in turn inspired the very famous George R. R. Martin's A Song of Ice and Fire.
England was ruled by the once fierce warrior king, Edward the Third, the victor of the legendary battle of Agincourt. The king is old and in his death bed. His five sons are Edward, the Black Prince, Lionel, John of Gaunt, Edmund, Duke of York, and Thomas of Woodstock. After King Edward's death, his grandson, son of Edward, is crowned king, as Richard the Second. He is deposed by Henry of Bolingbroke, King Henry the Fourth. Thus starts the Royal Line of Lancaster.
In 1443, a righteous and honorable English nobleman, William de la Pole, meets with the English spymaster, Derihew Brewer, to arrange peace between England and France. The English King, Richard IV, is a frail and sick man, and demands peace. The bride in question is Margaret, the second daughter of The Count of Anjou, Renee. The agreements to this marraige is the lands claimed by England on French soils be returned to the King of France.
War breaks out in Normandy, as many fleeing farmers rebel against the French who come to evict them. One of them is Thomas Woodchruch, as former archer. He had long lived in his lands in France, and didn't like to get evicted. He leads a band of rebels who ambush and attack the French armies. But he is outnumbered and at last has to flee.
While in England, Margaret becomes a very faithful and loyal wife to Richard, who is ailing. The Duke of York, Richard, has long eyed the throne of England, and finds ways to plot against the King. York's leadership in France is taken away and given to William de la Pole, who tries in vain to defend the French land.
The fleeing people from France cause a discontent in the common folk of England. From this rises a rebel. Jack Cade. Along with two of his best friends, he forms a band of armed farmers, who then march all the way to London, and sack it.
William de la Pole, is arrested and taken for torture, when King Richard IV with persuasive help from Margaret, saves William. But he is banished from England, to live the rest of his life in France. During his journey to France, he is waylaid by a pirate ship, commissioned by Richard, who kill William.
Conn Iggulden's Waf of Roses series of Historical fiction, is a very fine series to read.
July 19, 2013
This is my first venture into Iggulden territory. I've avoided his writing before as I've tended to associate him with “books for boys” - an association which was reaffirmed with the publication of The Dangerous Book for Boys which he co-wrote with his brother Hal. However, Stormbird attracted me as I find the War of the Roses a particularly intriguing historical period peopled with really engaging characters.
Having now read the novel, I can confirm it is a book for boys, filled with derring-do, lots of blood and gore and a love of detail, especially when it comes to the physical make up of an archer and his weaponry. Now, there's nothing wrong with attention to detail but I, personally, prefer my historical fiction to have more focus on the inner thoughts and motivation of characters with a particular emphasis on the female point of view plus a tad less poetic licence when it comes to the facts....I think we'll just have to agree to differ!
I loved the passages featuring Margaret d'Anjou as she grew in confidence from a young 14 year old being gifted to the English king in order to gain a truce to a strong-willed, brave woman struggling to hold on to her husband's throne while he was non compos mentis. I also enjoyed the portrayal of the brave, devoted Lord Suffolk who gave his heart and soul for his country. Less inspiring, for me, were the skirmishes between the English and French and the long trek of Jack Cade and his army of Kentish men as they laid siege to London.
Stormbird is the first of a series of books about The War of the Roses and I am sure it will be as successful as Iggulden's previous novels. It will appeal to those who enjoy action-packed, high-octane novels with lots of battles and information on strategy. As for me, being a bit of a girly, I'll stick with Philippa and Alison!
Having now read the novel, I can confirm it is a book for boys, filled with derring-do, lots of blood and gore and a love of detail, especially when it comes to the physical make up of an archer and his weaponry. Now, there's nothing wrong with attention to detail but I, personally, prefer my historical fiction to have more focus on the inner thoughts and motivation of characters with a particular emphasis on the female point of view plus a tad less poetic licence when it comes to the facts....I think we'll just have to agree to differ!
I loved the passages featuring Margaret d'Anjou as she grew in confidence from a young 14 year old being gifted to the English king in order to gain a truce to a strong-willed, brave woman struggling to hold on to her husband's throne while he was non compos mentis. I also enjoyed the portrayal of the brave, devoted Lord Suffolk who gave his heart and soul for his country. Less inspiring, for me, were the skirmishes between the English and French and the long trek of Jack Cade and his army of Kentish men as they laid siege to London.
Stormbird is the first of a series of books about The War of the Roses and I am sure it will be as successful as Iggulden's previous novels. It will appeal to those who enjoy action-packed, high-octane novels with lots of battles and information on strategy. As for me, being a bit of a girly, I'll stick with Philippa and Alison!
October 14, 2014
I rushed right through Stormbird in a day.
Appreciated a lot about the book. There are extensive historical notes and family trees. All interesting and helpful. Good characters were to be found in Margaret of Anjou, Thomas Woodchurch, Derry Brewer & Lord Suffolk. The POV from the Frenchmen was well done. Nice to have more than one side of things.
Still ended up with only a 2 star from me. Parts of the story felt too slow. Especially the section about the marriage of Margaret and Henry. The negotiations and troubles and proxy and......after awhile I just wanted to get on with the story. Though without it all, I doubt I would have liked Margaret as much. Bit of a conundrum there for me.
The story of Jack Cade felt jarring at the beginning. I had no idea why it was there and it took awhile to sort out why we kept coming back to his tale.
I imagine the next book will be better as the subject matter will be more interesting. Bring on the Duke of York!
Appreciated a lot about the book. There are extensive historical notes and family trees. All interesting and helpful. Good characters were to be found in Margaret of Anjou, Thomas Woodchurch, Derry Brewer & Lord Suffolk. The POV from the Frenchmen was well done. Nice to have more than one side of things.
Still ended up with only a 2 star from me. Parts of the story felt too slow. Especially the section about the marriage of Margaret and Henry. The negotiations and troubles and proxy and......after awhile I just wanted to get on with the story. Though without it all, I doubt I would have liked Margaret as much. Bit of a conundrum there for me.
The story of Jack Cade felt jarring at the beginning. I had no idea why it was there and it took awhile to sort out why we kept coming back to his tale.
I imagine the next book will be better as the subject matter will be more interesting. Bring on the Duke of York!
November 18, 2019
An interesting start with only a little of the bloody politics to come....
review to follow
review to follow
November 11, 2021
English title: Stormbird (War of the Roses 1)
2.5 disappointed stars: a mediocre rating for a mediocre novel.
Alright, why do I say mediocre?
1) really, really bad pacing
Normally in traditionally told narratives (which this is), summary follows scene. That is, the in depth "feel like you're there" bits are glued together with breather space bits of things like a character's opinion of the previous scene or a revisiting of the stakes/story up to that point. Give time for the imagination to process and rest.
Not here. Here it's scene, scene, scene, mega long scene, mega long scene, scene, tiny summary, mega long scene.
Iggulden, in an attempt to create excitement, instead wears the reader out, offering precious little down time until the reading experience becomes a blur of this event, that event, this death, that death, this battle, that battle. Rather like "Lord of the Rings" movies burnout. A beginner's mistake, really. Thirty lashes at dawn for the editor!
2) too much historical fiddling
In the author's notes, Iggulden admits playing gobsmackingly fast and loose with history towards the end of the novel.
He's got men who were already dead at the time appearing in key scenes just because he LIKES them. He's got things that happened over the space of several years smushed into the same time frame, making you think a tidal wave of crap crashed down on England all at once. He leaves out real facts for invented 'dramatic turns of events' obscuring the actual reasons for why things played out as they did (= warping historical understanding for those who read to learn).
And all this he does because the down time, the true pace, of history is "boring" (his words). Dunno. It could also be a case of *cough, bad structuring choices, cough*
3) fantasy tone, not historical fiction tone
Look, I'm not a fantasy reader, but I've seen enough of it to recognise when "Lord Perucullion" and "Farmer Bingbat of Xanthripoum" enter the room dragging pet dragons behind them.
The tone and narrative style is straight out of standard fantasy, not historical fiction. Just substitute the names and make it some fantasy kingdom and not England/France and fantasy readers would gobble it up.
Wrong genre, dude.
4) story fat/dumbed-down and incorrect details
Early on, we are treated to the very graphic and drawn-out torture death of a Jewish merchant. Then no more mention is made of the incident nor character. That poor man's death was just a footnote Iggulden found in a tome and thought interesting. Has NOTHING to do with WoTR. That's not an isolated incident for this novel, but it is pure story fat.
If all the incidences of this type of story fat were removed, the novel would be about 200 pages thinner. And a far better read.
Other reviewers have pointed out the numerous small eye-rolling historical inaccuracies.
Credit where credit is due, though: the writing flows quite well and some of the landscape descriptions/actions scenes are done more than competently. And the golden cover of the German edition is really, really pretty.
S'about it, though.
2.5 disappointed stars: a mediocre rating for a mediocre novel.
Alright, why do I say mediocre?
1) really, really bad pacing
Normally in traditionally told narratives (which this is), summary follows scene. That is, the in depth "feel like you're there" bits are glued together with breather space bits of things like a character's opinion of the previous scene or a revisiting of the stakes/story up to that point. Give time for the imagination to process and rest.
Not here. Here it's scene, scene, scene, mega long scene, mega long scene, scene, tiny summary, mega long scene.
Iggulden, in an attempt to create excitement, instead wears the reader out, offering precious little down time until the reading experience becomes a blur of this event, that event, this death, that death, this battle, that battle. Rather like "Lord of the Rings" movies burnout. A beginner's mistake, really. Thirty lashes at dawn for the editor!
2) too much historical fiddling
In the author's notes, Iggulden admits playing gobsmackingly fast and loose with history towards the end of the novel.
He's got men who were already dead at the time appearing in key scenes just because he LIKES them. He's got things that happened over the space of several years smushed into the same time frame, making you think a tidal wave of crap crashed down on England all at once. He leaves out real facts for invented 'dramatic turns of events' obscuring the actual reasons for why things played out as they did (= warping historical understanding for those who read to learn).
And all this he does because the down time, the true pace, of history is "boring" (his words). Dunno. It could also be a case of *cough, bad structuring choices, cough*
3) fantasy tone, not historical fiction tone
Look, I'm not a fantasy reader, but I've seen enough of it to recognise when "Lord Perucullion" and "Farmer Bingbat of Xanthripoum" enter the room dragging pet dragons behind them.
The tone and narrative style is straight out of standard fantasy, not historical fiction. Just substitute the names and make it some fantasy kingdom and not England/France and fantasy readers would gobble it up.
Wrong genre, dude.
4) story fat/dumbed-down and incorrect details
Early on, we are treated to the very graphic and drawn-out torture death of a Jewish merchant. Then no more mention is made of the incident nor character. That poor man's death was just a footnote Iggulden found in a tome and thought interesting. Has NOTHING to do with WoTR. That's not an isolated incident for this novel, but it is pure story fat.
If all the incidences of this type of story fat were removed, the novel would be about 200 pages thinner. And a far better read.
Other reviewers have pointed out the numerous small eye-rolling historical inaccuracies.
Credit where credit is due, though: the writing flows quite well and some of the landscape descriptions/actions scenes are done more than competently. And the golden cover of the German edition is really, really pretty.
S'about it, though.
December 30, 2013
As my first Iggulden book, I had high expectations. Perhaps I have been spoilt by the likes of Bernard Cornwall. The period itself is fascinating, which is why I chose it. The intrigue, the back room deals, the kings illness, the rebellion. It was such a tumultuous time for England! There were some standout characters: Derry, Margaret and Suffolk, were probably my favourites. I think for me, not having a thorough knowledge of this period, perhaps I wanted more detail about the characters and why they were choosing certain paths. Certainly you realise the difficulties writing about these period pieces when reading the epilogue and I can accept that. I just felt that there was something that didn't hold it all together. Going from a lot of other reviews I am in the minority, so for me it may just be a style thing.
November 10, 2023
ROYALTY READS PROJECT 2023
June 25, 2013
An exciting new historical novel which brings the past vividly to life, in all its bloodthirsty glory.
Stormbird is the thrilling new novel by bestselling, accomplished author Conn Iggulden (author of Caesar and Genghis Khan Series). Refreshingly original and compelling the extraordinary ‘war of the roses’ is captured accurately on the page, transforming historical fact into a fictional masterpiece. Colorful, vibrant and atmospheric I was greatly impressed by how Iggulden gets to the core of the greatest civil war and doesn’t diminish the rawness and harshness of the times. Gritty and realistic, the words touch upon all senses so as to paint a very real picture of what 1400 England was like. With the new television series “The White Queen” (based on Philippa Gregory’s novel), I feel that this period within history is extremely popular at the moment with a great buzz surrounding Henry VI’s and Edward III reign.
‘Stormbird’ is about King Henry VI of England, that decent and pious man who was so completely unable to rule as his father had done – the immortal victor of Agincourt. It is about Margaret of Anjou, the Queen he married twice, who was cast into a savage and hostile English court at the tender age of fifteen. Finally, it is about the five great families descended from King Edward III and how they fought and maneuvered to control the throne of England. Long-buried Kings are brought into the light once more, because some stories are too good to be allowed to grow cold.
Unlike other novels surrounding this time within our fascinating and sometimes brutal history, Stormbird speaks of what happened to REAL men and explains clearly why events took place. Conn Iggulden’s tight grasp on the reality of such distinctive events within our past is so assured, that you end up not only gaining an altogether clear image of it all, but something much closer to the heart. Those people who lived and struggled, who did their best in a time of adversity and change, are the greatest stories ever told – touching you inwardly and striking a chord in all our hearts. I felt the authenticity behind every word, which I could connect with as well as learn from. This truly is a powerful piece of prose and a new novel that is a shining jewel amongst a very competitive genre.
I would highly recommend ‘Stormbird’ and predict it to be this year’s bestselling novel.
*I won a Preview copy of Conn Iggulden’s “War of the Roses: Stormbird” through a Goodreads, First-Read giveaway. I would like to thank Penguin publishers and the author for this*
Stormbird is the thrilling new novel by bestselling, accomplished author Conn Iggulden (author of Caesar and Genghis Khan Series). Refreshingly original and compelling the extraordinary ‘war of the roses’ is captured accurately on the page, transforming historical fact into a fictional masterpiece. Colorful, vibrant and atmospheric I was greatly impressed by how Iggulden gets to the core of the greatest civil war and doesn’t diminish the rawness and harshness of the times. Gritty and realistic, the words touch upon all senses so as to paint a very real picture of what 1400 England was like. With the new television series “The White Queen” (based on Philippa Gregory’s novel), I feel that this period within history is extremely popular at the moment with a great buzz surrounding Henry VI’s and Edward III reign.
‘Stormbird’ is about King Henry VI of England, that decent and pious man who was so completely unable to rule as his father had done – the immortal victor of Agincourt. It is about Margaret of Anjou, the Queen he married twice, who was cast into a savage and hostile English court at the tender age of fifteen. Finally, it is about the five great families descended from King Edward III and how they fought and maneuvered to control the throne of England. Long-buried Kings are brought into the light once more, because some stories are too good to be allowed to grow cold.
Unlike other novels surrounding this time within our fascinating and sometimes brutal history, Stormbird speaks of what happened to REAL men and explains clearly why events took place. Conn Iggulden’s tight grasp on the reality of such distinctive events within our past is so assured, that you end up not only gaining an altogether clear image of it all, but something much closer to the heart. Those people who lived and struggled, who did their best in a time of adversity and change, are the greatest stories ever told – touching you inwardly and striking a chord in all our hearts. I felt the authenticity behind every word, which I could connect with as well as learn from. This truly is a powerful piece of prose and a new novel that is a shining jewel amongst a very competitive genre.
I would highly recommend ‘Stormbird’ and predict it to be this year’s bestselling novel.
*I won a Preview copy of Conn Iggulden’s “War of the Roses: Stormbird” through a Goodreads, First-Read giveaway. I would like to thank Penguin publishers and the author for this*
February 8, 2016
This is not a full review - this review pertains only to the 5-chapter sample won via Goodreads First Reads.
I'm a sucker for historical novels, and this is a good start. I could picture everything perfectly, I could feel the chill in the air.
The most poignant moment in those five chapters was definitely the deathbed scene in that first chapter. I felt really sorry for Alice, the way his sons disregarded her despite her obvious love for the king.
I've applied for the full book, and hope I get it. I'd love to review it in full.
I received a 5 chapter smapler of this for free via Goodreads First Reads.
I'm a sucker for historical novels, and this is a good start. I could picture everything perfectly, I could feel the chill in the air.
The most poignant moment in those five chapters was definitely the deathbed scene in that first chapter. I felt really sorry for Alice, the way his sons disregarded her despite her obvious love for the king.
I've applied for the full book, and hope I get it. I'd love to review it in full.
I received a 5 chapter smapler of this for free via Goodreads First Reads.
September 10, 2016
Escogí este libro porque me cuadraba para dos retos y ha resultado una gran sorpresa y de las buenas, no, de las mejores.
El autor narra de una forma amena el origen de la guerra de las dos rosas, la guerra civil que dividió a Inglaterra en dos bandos durante 30 años de forma intermitente, enfrentando a las casas de los Lancaster y los York en su deseo de acceder al trono inglés.
Utilizando en todo momento personajes históricos, Iggulden nos presenta una Inglaterra "gobernada" por un rey débil Enrique VI, al que casan con una joven Margarita en busca de una tregua con Francia, el enemigo acérrimo (pocos años después de la ejecución de Juana de Arco), a costa de lo que sea y quien sea, dejando en la calle a cientos de ingleses que se ven desposeídos de sus granjas por un acuerdo maldito desde el principio.
Alternando escenas protagonizadas por las distintas facciones, nos presenta a los distintos "personajes" de la trama: el honorable lord Suffolk, el astuto lord York, el intrigante Derry Brewer, el levantisco Jack Cade y los traicionados y abandonados arqueros del rey.
En resumen, un gran libro histórico, muy bien ambientado y narrado.
El autor narra de una forma amena el origen de la guerra de las dos rosas, la guerra civil que dividió a Inglaterra en dos bandos durante 30 años de forma intermitente, enfrentando a las casas de los Lancaster y los York en su deseo de acceder al trono inglés.
Utilizando en todo momento personajes históricos, Iggulden nos presenta una Inglaterra "gobernada" por un rey débil Enrique VI, al que casan con una joven Margarita en busca de una tregua con Francia, el enemigo acérrimo (pocos años después de la ejecución de Juana de Arco), a costa de lo que sea y quien sea, dejando en la calle a cientos de ingleses que se ven desposeídos de sus granjas por un acuerdo maldito desde el principio.
Alternando escenas protagonizadas por las distintas facciones, nos presenta a los distintos "personajes" de la trama: el honorable lord Suffolk, el astuto lord York, el intrigante Derry Brewer, el levantisco Jack Cade y los traicionados y abandonados arqueros del rey.
En resumen, un gran libro histórico, muy bien ambientado y narrado.
April 26, 2017
Yo quería más Margarita de Anjou.
Podría resumir mi opinión de libro así. Tenemos una época convulsa, con conspiraciones, nobles ambiciosos, planes ocultos y guerras. Son los acontecimientos desencadenantes de la Guerra de las Dos Rosas. Y una gran parte de la novela se centra en un arquero random y sus desventuras. A ver, que yo entiendo que había que establecer el contexto social y la pérdida de Maine era muy importante, pero es que hay mucha acción, y muchas peleas, y muchas batallas, y sinceramente, a mí todo eso me daba igual. Están muy bien escritas, pero no captan mi interés. Quiero decir, todos aquellos que quieran una lectura entretenida y llena de acción, disfrutarán mucho de este libro. Yo prefiero las intrigas palaciegas.
Lo de Jack Cade lo entiendo más, aunque de nuevo, su lucha y sus batallas se comen muchas páginas que perfectamente podrían haberse centrado más en Margarita de Anjou. Porque yo quería más Margarita de Anjou.
Podría resumir mi opinión de libro así. Tenemos una época convulsa, con conspiraciones, nobles ambiciosos, planes ocultos y guerras. Son los acontecimientos desencadenantes de la Guerra de las Dos Rosas. Y una gran parte de la novela se centra en un arquero random y sus desventuras. A ver, que yo entiendo que había que establecer el contexto social y la pérdida de Maine era muy importante, pero es que hay mucha acción, y muchas peleas, y muchas batallas, y sinceramente, a mí todo eso me daba igual. Están muy bien escritas, pero no captan mi interés. Quiero decir, todos aquellos que quieran una lectura entretenida y llena de acción, disfrutarán mucho de este libro. Yo prefiero las intrigas palaciegas.
Lo de Jack Cade lo entiendo más, aunque de nuevo, su lucha y sus batallas se comen muchas páginas que perfectamente podrían haberse centrado más en Margarita de Anjou. Porque yo quería más Margarita de Anjou.
August 1, 2018
En realidad, 4'75 ⭐
Hacía unos meses que no leía narrativa histórica pura y dura, y este libro ha sido todo un descubrimiento. No hay mucho que pueda contar sin desvelar gran parte de la trama (además de que la saga está basada en un hecho real), así que solo puedo decir algunas cosas en general.
Para ser el inicio de una saga suceden muchas cosas y hay un gran cambio en algunos de los personajes desde el incio hasta el final del libro. Lo que me encanta de este género es lo inesperado que es, nunca sé por dónde irá la trama, y me encanta que mueran personajes sin que me lo espere 😅
La pluma del autor es muy amena, hace que se lea deprisa y sin que resulte pesado, y las descripciones son concisas. De los personajes, mis favoritos han sido Derry y Margarita. Qué maravilla de señora, estoy segura de que va a dar mucho juego en los siguientes libros, o eso espero.
No recomiendo el libro para lectores que se aburran con conflictos bélicos y políticos, porque gran parte de la trama está centrada únicamente en eso. A mí es algo que me gusta mucho y que he disfrutado, estoy deseando ver cómo continua la historia y ver qué pasa con el trono de Inglaterra.
Le he puesto un 4'75 porque los capítulos de Jack Cade me daban un poco de pereza y me costaban un poco más. Es un personaje que no me ha gustado, no he logrado empatizar con su "causa" y creo que era bastante hipócrita y contradictorio.
**ACTUALIZACIÓN 01/08/2018***
Reseña completa en el blog: http://tintaliteratura.blogspot.com/2...
Hacía unos meses que no leía narrativa histórica pura y dura, y este libro ha sido todo un descubrimiento. No hay mucho que pueda contar sin desvelar gran parte de la trama (además de que la saga está basada en un hecho real), así que solo puedo decir algunas cosas en general.
Para ser el inicio de una saga suceden muchas cosas y hay un gran cambio en algunos de los personajes desde el incio hasta el final del libro. Lo que me encanta de este género es lo inesperado que es, nunca sé por dónde irá la trama, y me encanta que mueran personajes sin que me lo espere 😅
La pluma del autor es muy amena, hace que se lea deprisa y sin que resulte pesado, y las descripciones son concisas. De los personajes, mis favoritos han sido Derry y Margarita. Qué maravilla de señora, estoy segura de que va a dar mucho juego en los siguientes libros, o eso espero.
No recomiendo el libro para lectores que se aburran con conflictos bélicos y políticos, porque gran parte de la trama está centrada únicamente en eso. A mí es algo que me gusta mucho y que he disfrutado, estoy deseando ver cómo continua la historia y ver qué pasa con el trono de Inglaterra.
Le he puesto un 4'75 porque los capítulos de Jack Cade me daban un poco de pereza y me costaban un poco más. Es un personaje que no me ha gustado, no he logrado empatizar con su "causa" y creo que era bastante hipócrita y contradictorio.
**ACTUALIZACIÓN 01/08/2018***
Reseña completa en el blog: http://tintaliteratura.blogspot.com/2...
January 16, 2021
3.75
Gostei muito, mas acho que ficou devendo na construção dos personagens. Veremos se isso melhora nos próximos.
Gostei muito, mas acho que ficou devendo na construção dos personagens. Veremos se isso melhora nos próximos.
October 20, 2013
This is Iggulden at his finest. Notably his best book yet!
One thing I took from his previous two series, the Caesar led Emperor novels and the Mongol centred saga, was that his style felt very grand, detailed and rich in detail yet somehow a little detached from the action. By that I mean, although there was elements of getting inside key characters minds, by and large it felt as if it were written by an observer, or an outsider rather than someone palpably in the middle of the action.
This first instalment of his 15th Century England War Of The Roses' themed series has the feel of Iggulden on top form. It maintains the high standard of rich detail and immersive action with a whole new level of characterisation and a depth of feeling that actually makes you feel like you've got your feet figuratively on the ground next to the character themselves rather than hovering slightly above them watching the action. This is Iggulden at his most tangible and in his element.
Add that rich vein of superb characterisation to a mastery of weaving various threads of characters into an over-arcing tapestry of a story, teasing and manipulating the reader so expertly that you end up actually rather caring about what happens to the characters. Case in point being Jack Cade. To begin with, I thought he would be just a typical knuckleheaded bruiser who'd gather a rabble of ne'er-do-wells around him and soon meet his suitably sticky end. And although for the most part you're not particularly fond of him, you do find yourself growing strangely endeared to him so that by the time his character leaves the story, you actually sympathise with him rather than rub your hands with glee.
The story does seem to plateau in places, though not dip, which is literally the single, vague hair of a gripe I could even think of to try and balance out the review.
I'll admit as an Englishman that I knew nothing whatsoever concrete about the War Of The Roses before reading this book and was a little daunted by how internecine and serpentine the warring & political manoeuvring might prove to be but Iggulden has not only managed to portray it in an enjoyable accessible way but whetted my appetite for looking deeper into the subject matter at heart and teaching me something historical in the process.
I'll say it again, Iggulden's finest hour. Marvellous.
This book is far more deserving of a 4 1/2 out of 5 but as you can't mark it like that on here and I didn't have the conviction to mark it a perfect 5/5, I had to go for a four instead.
One thing I took from his previous two series, the Caesar led Emperor novels and the Mongol centred saga, was that his style felt very grand, detailed and rich in detail yet somehow a little detached from the action. By that I mean, although there was elements of getting inside key characters minds, by and large it felt as if it were written by an observer, or an outsider rather than someone palpably in the middle of the action.
This first instalment of his 15th Century England War Of The Roses' themed series has the feel of Iggulden on top form. It maintains the high standard of rich detail and immersive action with a whole new level of characterisation and a depth of feeling that actually makes you feel like you've got your feet figuratively on the ground next to the character themselves rather than hovering slightly above them watching the action. This is Iggulden at his most tangible and in his element.
Add that rich vein of superb characterisation to a mastery of weaving various threads of characters into an over-arcing tapestry of a story, teasing and manipulating the reader so expertly that you end up actually rather caring about what happens to the characters. Case in point being Jack Cade. To begin with, I thought he would be just a typical knuckleheaded bruiser who'd gather a rabble of ne'er-do-wells around him and soon meet his suitably sticky end. And although for the most part you're not particularly fond of him, you do find yourself growing strangely endeared to him so that by the time his character leaves the story, you actually sympathise with him rather than rub your hands with glee.
The story does seem to plateau in places, though not dip, which is literally the single, vague hair of a gripe I could even think of to try and balance out the review.
I'll admit as an Englishman that I knew nothing whatsoever concrete about the War Of The Roses before reading this book and was a little daunted by how internecine and serpentine the warring & political manoeuvring might prove to be but Iggulden has not only managed to portray it in an enjoyable accessible way but whetted my appetite for looking deeper into the subject matter at heart and teaching me something historical in the process.
I'll say it again, Iggulden's finest hour. Marvellous.
This book is far more deserving of a 4 1/2 out of 5 but as you can't mark it like that on here and I didn't have the conviction to mark it a perfect 5/5, I had to go for a four instead.
October 30, 2013
Conn Iggulden was interviewed by Mariella Frostrup for the BBC programme 'Open Book' recently and said, "The wonderful thing about historical fiction is it has to entertain and inform." Stormbird is the first in his new series about the Ward of the Roses and certainly achieves both.
I've read quite a few books about this period but this the first to explore what it must have been like for the English settlers who suddenly found their lands in France had been given back to the French. Conn keeps up the pace by interweaving several plot lines (including one about Jack Cade's rebellion that could be a whole book in its own right.)
I was also intrigued by the way he made Richard Duke of York the villain and the Duke of Suffolk, William de la Pole, into a tragic hero. Most authors are quick to dismiss de la Pole as an inept blunderer but it all looks very different from his point of view.
In his end notes Conn Iggulden comments on how historical fiction often involves filling in the gaps and unexplained parts of history. When this is done well, as in Stormbird, it can really help to see the known facts in the context of the attitudes and conditions of the times. This is particularly the case with the complex ‘Wars of the Roses’, where the history was of course written by the victors.
It's clear how Conn Iggulden has become one of our best-selling historical fiction authors - and I'm looking forward to the next in the series, which he says he is planned as a trilogy but will probably end up as a four or five parter.
I've read quite a few books about this period but this the first to explore what it must have been like for the English settlers who suddenly found their lands in France had been given back to the French. Conn keeps up the pace by interweaving several plot lines (including one about Jack Cade's rebellion that could be a whole book in its own right.)
I was also intrigued by the way he made Richard Duke of York the villain and the Duke of Suffolk, William de la Pole, into a tragic hero. Most authors are quick to dismiss de la Pole as an inept blunderer but it all looks very different from his point of view.
In his end notes Conn Iggulden comments on how historical fiction often involves filling in the gaps and unexplained parts of history. When this is done well, as in Stormbird, it can really help to see the known facts in the context of the attitudes and conditions of the times. This is particularly the case with the complex ‘Wars of the Roses’, where the history was of course written by the victors.
It's clear how Conn Iggulden has become one of our best-selling historical fiction authors - and I'm looking forward to the next in the series, which he says he is planned as a trilogy but will probably end up as a four or five parter.
March 29, 2019
I really liked this book and can’t wait till I get the second book in the series ☺️
February 23, 2014
Stormbird: An Opinionated View of History.
When I look back at history and the figures instrumental in making events worthy of record, I like to have an unbiased view. I mean really, can any of us truly judge those living in a completely different culture, society, and time to what we live in now? And how can any of us purport to be able to know what individuals were thinking of and planning six centuries ago? We obviously cannot.
I know that historical fiction is exactly that: fiction. And the events therein, although based on actualities, are dramatised to an extent to make them dramatic and exciting for a modern reader. Knowing that this is a truth about the genre didn't help me like Stormbird more. When I read or watch something based on history, I like to have the belief that those things actually happened to those people. It then pulls me out of it a little when I do some research to find out that, although similar, it wasn't what actually happened. This doesn't happen all the time however, the fate of William de la Pole is pretty much spot on, but it does happen often enough for me to dislike the alterations. What most annoyed me was the demonisation of Richard, Duke of York. I understand for a story as a piece of any medium it is easier to get people involved if there is an understanding about the identity of a figure that can, for purposes of simplicity, be labelled 'antagonist'. The story mainly focuses on the side of the Lancaster's, most chapters revolving around Margaret of Anjou, or Derihew Brewer (a fictionalised character, which also annoyed me somewhat). So there had to be an adversary. As an author of a 3rd person narrative regarding history and the lives of real people, I believe you should have the responsibility to represent characters without your own bias. Particularly when it involves damaging the reputation of a person in the eyes of future generations. I felt when reading this novel, although it may not necessarily be the case, that Mr. Iggulden brought his own opinion into it. By making York appear to be this poisonous ambitious character, that disliked everyone and whose only goal was to claim the throne. Of course there would be rivalries, there would be discontent. A civil war truly did happen. But for one side to appear angelic and the other to be cruel and without mercy, I felt to be a bit much.
The novel itself failed to grab my attention. I did feel saddened that I wasn't more interested in it. The period of history itself is fascinating! But the novel, the first of a series on The Wars of the Roses simply seemed more like a war novel with France with a rushed account of the Jack Cade rebellion thrown in at the end. I know these events were pivotal to the escalation to the civil war, but the novel was lacking a lot about that civil war, and York himself isn't in that much. The issues with France did seem to drag on. There were extended battle scenes which I struggled to get involved in because they were in it too early and I didn't feel connected to any of the characters. There was also too much focus on battles. Heck, don't get me wrong I enjoy battles. But you can only have too much, and sometimes when you've read one battle scene you've read them all. For that period of history, I expected more political intrigue. More behind the scenes events. But there wasn't really anything like that. It jumped around characters not really developing any of them (besides possibly Margaret) and without any true connection to scenes. In the span of 470 pages it covers 8 years of history but doesn't make it clear that such an extent of time has passed. At one point William thinks back to four years ago when he brought Margaret over from France, but that scene was depicted only 100 pages ago and is the first indication that such a passage of time has taken place! It really did throw me out of the narrative. Along with little description of key scenes and consistent awkward dialogue (the dialogue is potentially the worst thing about the novel) it was a struggle to be hooked.
As for characters as of yet unmentioned, what was with the random archer Thomas Woodchurch? How come he seemed to know every important person under the sun? Even though he had never been more than an archer. Her knew the King's Spymaster personally and also knew the leader of the rebellion, again personally. It was just too far fetched to be believable! And Mr. Iggulden really does love the English archer, he couldn't have enough of his endless ranting about how amazing English archers were. All the time. Thomas would talk about how amazing being an archer was, and how strong and committed you had to be. William would be in the middle of a battle, barely thinking about the infantry, but fawning over how incredible the archers were. There was even a scene with the French King when he's shouting about how awesome English archers are and how he wants some of his own. Alright Iggulden, I get it! Archers are the bomb, please just move on already!
I think the strongest parts of the novel were those involving Jack Cade. You truly did get a feel for the injustice he received and for the motives that led him to start his rebellion. Iggulden had a lot of room for artistic license here as not much is known about the real Jack Cade and he did it well. I did get involved with Cade and his merry band. His dream of happiness and the inevitable dashing of his hopes were quite moving.
As a closing comment I was never entirely sure why the novel was called Stormbird. It wasn't explained and wherever I try to look it up I get no answers. So that's a mystery for me. I'm guessing it has some connection to Margaret and I did enjoy her growth from naïve fun-loving child to a hard powerful ruler in order to make up for her weak husband. It was believable and her interactions with Henry VI were quite touching.
But overall the book suffers from poor dialogue, skimming over characters, and getting too bogged down in uninteresting plots. That's just what I thought about that. Stormbird, I wasn't really a great fan of it.
When I look back at history and the figures instrumental in making events worthy of record, I like to have an unbiased view. I mean really, can any of us truly judge those living in a completely different culture, society, and time to what we live in now? And how can any of us purport to be able to know what individuals were thinking of and planning six centuries ago? We obviously cannot.
I know that historical fiction is exactly that: fiction. And the events therein, although based on actualities, are dramatised to an extent to make them dramatic and exciting for a modern reader. Knowing that this is a truth about the genre didn't help me like Stormbird more. When I read or watch something based on history, I like to have the belief that those things actually happened to those people. It then pulls me out of it a little when I do some research to find out that, although similar, it wasn't what actually happened. This doesn't happen all the time however, the fate of William de la Pole is pretty much spot on, but it does happen often enough for me to dislike the alterations. What most annoyed me was the demonisation of Richard, Duke of York. I understand for a story as a piece of any medium it is easier to get people involved if there is an understanding about the identity of a figure that can, for purposes of simplicity, be labelled 'antagonist'. The story mainly focuses on the side of the Lancaster's, most chapters revolving around Margaret of Anjou, or Derihew Brewer (a fictionalised character, which also annoyed me somewhat). So there had to be an adversary. As an author of a 3rd person narrative regarding history and the lives of real people, I believe you should have the responsibility to represent characters without your own bias. Particularly when it involves damaging the reputation of a person in the eyes of future generations. I felt when reading this novel, although it may not necessarily be the case, that Mr. Iggulden brought his own opinion into it. By making York appear to be this poisonous ambitious character, that disliked everyone and whose only goal was to claim the throne. Of course there would be rivalries, there would be discontent. A civil war truly did happen. But for one side to appear angelic and the other to be cruel and without mercy, I felt to be a bit much.
The novel itself failed to grab my attention. I did feel saddened that I wasn't more interested in it. The period of history itself is fascinating! But the novel, the first of a series on The Wars of the Roses simply seemed more like a war novel with France with a rushed account of the Jack Cade rebellion thrown in at the end. I know these events were pivotal to the escalation to the civil war, but the novel was lacking a lot about that civil war, and York himself isn't in that much. The issues with France did seem to drag on. There were extended battle scenes which I struggled to get involved in because they were in it too early and I didn't feel connected to any of the characters. There was also too much focus on battles. Heck, don't get me wrong I enjoy battles. But you can only have too much, and sometimes when you've read one battle scene you've read them all. For that period of history, I expected more political intrigue. More behind the scenes events. But there wasn't really anything like that. It jumped around characters not really developing any of them (besides possibly Margaret) and without any true connection to scenes. In the span of 470 pages it covers 8 years of history but doesn't make it clear that such an extent of time has passed. At one point William thinks back to four years ago when he brought Margaret over from France, but that scene was depicted only 100 pages ago and is the first indication that such a passage of time has taken place! It really did throw me out of the narrative. Along with little description of key scenes and consistent awkward dialogue (the dialogue is potentially the worst thing about the novel) it was a struggle to be hooked.
As for characters as of yet unmentioned, what was with the random archer Thomas Woodchurch? How come he seemed to know every important person under the sun? Even though he had never been more than an archer. Her knew the King's Spymaster personally and also knew the leader of the rebellion, again personally. It was just too far fetched to be believable! And Mr. Iggulden really does love the English archer, he couldn't have enough of his endless ranting about how amazing English archers were. All the time. Thomas would talk about how amazing being an archer was, and how strong and committed you had to be. William would be in the middle of a battle, barely thinking about the infantry, but fawning over how incredible the archers were. There was even a scene with the French King when he's shouting about how awesome English archers are and how he wants some of his own. Alright Iggulden, I get it! Archers are the bomb, please just move on already!
I think the strongest parts of the novel were those involving Jack Cade. You truly did get a feel for the injustice he received and for the motives that led him to start his rebellion. Iggulden had a lot of room for artistic license here as not much is known about the real Jack Cade and he did it well. I did get involved with Cade and his merry band. His dream of happiness and the inevitable dashing of his hopes were quite moving.
As a closing comment I was never entirely sure why the novel was called Stormbird. It wasn't explained and wherever I try to look it up I get no answers. So that's a mystery for me. I'm guessing it has some connection to Margaret and I did enjoy her growth from naïve fun-loving child to a hard powerful ruler in order to make up for her weak husband. It was believable and her interactions with Henry VI were quite touching.
But overall the book suffers from poor dialogue, skimming over characters, and getting too bogged down in uninteresting plots. That's just what I thought about that. Stormbird, I wasn't really a great fan of it.
June 5, 2022
Войната на розите е интересен период в историята на Англия, в който поради слабия и болнав крал, различните благороднически фамилии започват жесток сблъсък за надмощие в държавата. И понеже явно това не е достатъчно да осере достатъчно положението, селячеството избухва в кървави бунтове, а Франция замисля поредната военна кампания срещу Острова.
Въпреки, че влага голяма доза художествена измислица в реалните исторически събития, Кон Игълдън успява да избегне клишето (капан, в който падат дори много историци, относно различни периоди и личности) на "тия са добрите, тия - лошите" и изгражда, наистина не особено дълбоки, но пък правдиви образи на историческите личности - показва ги като хора, всеки със своите интереси и стремежи, всеки със своите виждания за събитията и бъдещето, всеки със своите причини да прави това, което прави.
Така дукът на Анжу е противен дъртак, но разбираме желанието му да възстанови семейния престиж и богатство, херцогът на Йорк изглежда жесток, защото се възползва от слабостта на краля, но от друга гледна точка, кой друг ще стъпи в обувките на немощния крал и ще измъкне Англия от очевидната опасност отвън? Уилям Пул пък, принципен и честен, не успява да направи нищо полезно и практически вреди как��о на страната си, така и на краля, на когото е верен до гроб.
Въпреки, че влага голяма доза художествена измислица в реалните исторически събития, Кон Игълдън успява да избегне клишето (капан, в който падат дори много историци, относно различни периоди и личности) на "тия са добрите, тия - лошите" и изгражда, наистина не особено дълбоки, но пък правдиви образи на историческите личности - показва ги като хора, всеки със своите интереси и стремежи, всеки със своите виждания за събитията и бъдещето, всеки със своите причини да прави това, което прави.
Така дукът на Анжу е противен дъртак, но разбираме желанието му да възстанови семейния престиж и богатство, херцогът на Йорк изглежда жесток, защото се възползва от слабостта на краля, но от друга гледна точка, кой друг ще стъпи в обувките на немощния крал и ще измъкне Англия от очевидната опасност отвън? Уилям Пул пък, принципен и честен, не успява да направи нищо полезно и практически вреди как��о на страната си, така и на краля, на когото е верен до гроб.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 1,359 reviews