Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

At the Heart of the State: The Moral World of Institutions

Rate this book
The state is often regarded as an abstract and neutral bureaucratic entity. Against this common sense idea, At the Heart of the State argues that it is also a concrete and situated reality, embodied in the work of its agents and inscribed in the issues of its time. 



The result of a five-year investigation conducted by ten scholars, this book describes and analyses the police, the court system, the prison apparatus, the social services, and mental health facilities in France. Combining genealogy and ethnography, its authors show that these state institutions do not simply implement laws, rules and procedures: they mobilise values and affects, judgements and emotions. In other words, they reflect the morality of the state. 



Of immense interest to both social scientists and political theorists, this work will make an important contribution to the ever expanding literature on the contemporary state.

312 pages, Hardcover

Published July 15, 2015

4 people are currently reading
75 people want to read

About the author

Didier Fassin

89 books110 followers
Didier Fassin is a French anthropologist and sociologist. He is currently the James D. Wolfensohn Professor of Social Science at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton and holds a Direction of Studies in Political and Moral Anthropology at the École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales in Paris.

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
7 (58%)
4 stars
2 (16%)
3 stars
3 (25%)
2 stars
0 (0%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 of 1 review
Profile Image for Rallie.
295 reviews4 followers
March 4, 2016
The chapters in this book have some interesting contributions to conversations regarding state institutions, and Fassin's introduction perfectly sets the stage by explaining the dialectical perspective on structure/agent being employed in these studies. Methodologically it is a good book. However, from the perspective of analysis there appears to be a need to incorporate more "steps" in the dialectic. Not enough "dancers" (agents) are considered.
Displaying 1 of 1 review

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.