This book checks out how well Churchill predicted the future. It is an interesting concept and idea. Although Churchill would have dismissed it. A Politician needs, “the ability to foretell what is going to happen tomorrow, next week, next month, and next year. And to have the ability afterwards to explain why it didn’t happen.”
It is a good book but author may be too in love with his subject. Humes makes makes good case.
It is interesting to see how Churchill could envision what would happen. The end of the Cold War, Hitler, and visions of saving London as a 16 year old. It seems to have been daydreams combined with historical knowledge and astute observations on culture. Many of his predictions based on knowledge of history. Could see patterns and ‘social forces’ that would shape what was next. He had an understanding of evil, ‘knew Hitler better than Hitler knew him.” Presciently he was working on Louis XIV when Hitler starting rising up and saw the parallels. He predicted technology, liked author’s view that Churchill never feared technology and tried to see how it fit into the future. He could put the pieces in like a puzzle.
Churchill was an optimist, feared war but not was willing to fight. The spooky part is his vision in his only novel. Incredibly tells a bit of the story he would be part of in World War II. The parallels with the Second World War and the hero in it and Churchill seems very prophetic. Interesting book, different perspective on Churchill, his predictions and inventive mind help create tanks and the Mulberry harbors. Truly did, as Nixon said, have his own crystal ball.