Εκστρατεία του Δαρείου εναντίον των Σκυθών. Πρώτη περσική επέκταση στην Ευρώπη. Εκστρατεία των Περσών στη Λιβύη. Ο Ηρόδοτος, γόνος εύπορης οικογένειας της Αλικαρνασσού, γεννήθηκε πιθανότατα το 484 π.Χ. Από τις ποικίλες πληροφορίες για τη ζωή του εξακριβωμένες είναι ότι έζησε κάποιο διάστημα της νεότητάς του στη Σάμο, ότι ταξίδεψε στην Ελλάδα, τη Σκυθία, τον Πόντο και την Ανατολή, και ότι πήρε μέρος στον αποικισμό των Θουρίων, της πόλης στην οποία πέθανε περί το 430 π.Χ. [...]
Herodotus (Greek: Ηρόδοτος) (c. 484 – c. 425 BC) was a Greek historian and geographer from the Greek city of Halicarnassus, part of the Persian Empire (now Bodrum, Turkey) and a later citizen of Thurii in modern Calabria, Italy. He is known for having written the Histories – a detailed account of the Greco-Persian Wars. Herodotus was the first writer to perform systematic investigation of historical events. He has been described as "The Father of History", a title conferred on him by the ancient Roman orator Marcus Tullius Cicero. The Histories primarily cover the lives of prominent kings and famous battles such as Marathon, Thermopylae, Artemisium, Salamis, Plataea, and Mycale. His work deviates from the main topics to provide a cultural, ethnographical, geographical, and historiographical background that forms an essential part of the narrative and provides readers with a wellspring of additional information. Herodotus has been criticized for his inclusion of "legends and fanciful accounts" in his work. The contemporaneous historian Thucydides accused him of making up stories for entertainment. However, Herodotus explained that he reported what he could see and was told. A sizable portion of the Histories has since been confirmed by modern historians and archaeologists.
Very interesting read with tales of the legendary Amazon tribe of women, evil dictators and more assumptions of mythological explanation for the unexplained, it reiterates the deception of reality created from the crevices bordering ancient civilizations. Herodotus’ books about the perception of the past in his day truly expresses how the lack of knowledge leaves rationalization as the precluding deficit in reasoning. I found the book entertaining at time, baffling at other and a conduit for lunacy for the unstable, but worth the time and effort.
Historically, it is great. However, I find some parts unrealistic e.g. building the bridge; maybe it's true though, I don't know. Mostly though, I just didn't find it enjoyable, and it just seemed to drag on and on.