Utilizando a forma de diálogos filosóficos, Peter Kreeft analisa uma série de filósofos modernos e suas filosofia, num divertido e estranho encontro com Sócrates no mundo do além, na eternidade.
Neste volume, Kreeft inicia uma investigação socrática sobre o pensamento do filósofo David Hume, desafiando os seus conceitos e apresentando refutações ao seu ceticismo. Segundo Kreeft, Hume é o cético "mais difícil de refutar na história do pensamento humano".
Como nos outros volumes da série Sócrates encontra, o leitor deparará neste livros com uma leitura profunda e espirituosa, através de uma divertida e perspicaz exploração da filosofia moderna, que certamente irá agradar tanto o leitor comum como àqueles com mais inclinação às leituras filosóficas.
Peter Kreeft is an American philosopher and prolific author of over eighty books on Christian theology, philosophy, and apologetics. A convert from Protestantism to Catholicism, his journey was shaped by his study of Church history, Gothic architecture, and Thomistic thought. He earned his BA from Calvin College, an MA and PhD from Fordham University, and pursued further studies at Yale. Since 1965, he has taught philosophy at Boston College and also at The King’s College. Kreeft is known for formulating “Twenty Arguments for the Existence of God” with Ronald K. Tacelli, featured in their Handbook of Christian Apologetics. A strong advocate for unity among Christians, he emphasizes shared belief in Christ over denominational differences.
A good introduction to the most influential philosophies of David Hume. But toward the end my head was spinning. It's heavy on logic, and splicing of terminology, and this book would be perfect for a college course on Hume's "Inquiry" (which is what the book was intended for).
That said, Peter Kreeft does have a way of simplifying the most confusing and difficult of concepts. This book is important, regardless of it being difficult, and helped me understand why Hume's philosophy has been so influential, particularly into our own time.
An important read for anyone wrestling with the appeals of Humeanism. (And, yes, the book is full of awful puns, which "Socrates" happily acknowledges, and which lightens the intensity of their dialogue.)
Four stars: Well written and humorous, but also dry at times because of the content. Kreeft did the best he could with what he had! A daring feat. Perhaps, also because I've read some of his other books, Prayer For Beginners, Heaven: The Heart's Deepest Longing, C.S. Lewis for the Third Millennium, Making Choices, Jesus Shock, How to Win the Culture War, which have been life-changing.
A formidable critique and (I daresay) a conclusive refutation of the main points of Hume's philosophy, namely his strict empiricism, his skepticism, his denial of causation, and his argument against miracles. Because Hume's philosophy has done so much damage and has become so firmly entrenched in the minds of Western people, where it sits unchallenged on its throne of modern dogmatism, this book should be read even by those who have only a minimal interest in philosophy. Kreeft's winsome style, common sense approach, and nontechnical language make this book both easy and enjoyable to read.
I read this book for a paper I wrote on Hume's essay against miracles. In his chapter on miracles, Kreeft brings up a good point about judging miracles not solely on the basis of sensory data and probability, but on the basis of things that only the mind can capture, such as the trustworthiness of a friend. Miracles, after-all, are performed by persons, performed for persons, reported by persons and believed by persons.
Premise was perhaps more interesting than the read..a deeper delve into philosphy basics is helpful. But was interesting nonetheless..here Socrates meets Hume, the great philisophical skeptic, in an "unknown" place (presumably purgatory) and through discussion come not to refute Hume but to certainly open the door to possibilites of the merit of reason and dogma. Hume was a troubled skeptic and found his own arguments disconcerting.
Also have been skeptical of Hume's skepticism, and now I see it was justified. This is my third reading in this series. Descartes next! Enjoy this book.
A very in-depth critique of Humes' dogmatic skepticism and how it's self-contradicting, also his argument against miracles which falls off with circular reasoning and begging the question, and a very deep dive into his critique of causation which simply turns out to be self-refuting
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.