The Paris Commune of 1871, the first instance of a working-class seizure of power, has been subject to countless interpretations; reviled by its enemies as a murderous bacchanalia of the unwashed while praised by supporters as an exemplar of proletarian anarchism in action. As both a successful model to be imitated and as a devastating failure to be avoided. All of the interpretations are tendentious. Historians view the working class’s three-month rule through their own prism, distant in time and space. Voices of the Paris Commune takes a different tack. In this book only those who were present in the spring of 1871, who lived through and participated in the Commune, are heard. The Paris Commune had a vibrant press, and it is represented here by its most important newspaper, Le Cri du Peuple , edited by Jules Vallès, member of the First International. Like any legitimate government, the Paris Commune held parliamentary sessions and issued daily printed reports of the heated, contentious deliberations that belie any accusation of dictatorship. Included in this collection is the transcript of the debate in the Commune, just days before its final defeat, on the establishing of a Committee of Public Safety and on the fate of the hostages held by the Commune, hostages who would ultimately be killed. Finally, Voices of the Paris Commune contains a selection from the inquiry carried out twenty years after the event by the intellectual review La Revue Blanche , asking participants to judge the successes and failures of the Paris Commune. This section provides a fascinating range of opinions of this epochal event.
Some fun stuff in this. The main takeaway was how divided the memories of the Commune were. You have people saying the problem was lack of central authority and decisive military action alongside the libertarians criticizing the concept of government. The book tilts towards the more libertarian but you get some nice little bites of everything. Ultimately though it turned out I didn't really care about the details of the battles and such, even though I did enjoy the more Kristin Ross style stuff about the meaning of the Commune.
“But what the Chiefs didn’t know to do, the nameless crowd did. There were many of them, 30 to 40,000 perhaps, who died around Paris for the cause they loved. There were many as well who, within the city fell before the machine guns, shouting ‘Vive Le Commune!’”
“It held before us for the future, not through its rulers but through its defenders, an ideal far superior to that of all the revolutions that had preceded it. It commits in advanced those who want to continue it-in France and throughout the world - to fight for a new society in which there will neither be masters by birth, titles, or money, nor servants by origin, cast, or salary. Everywhere the word commune was understood in the widest sense, As having to do with a new humanity, formed of free And equal companions, ignorant of the existence of ancient borders, and assisting each other in peace from one end of the World to the other.”
Neat collection of primary source documents and interviews. Very interesting to read the Commune's post-mortem in the 'Inquiry on the Commune'. The Versaillais' Bloody Week seems all the more cold and murderous. Heroes one and all. Louise Michel though, was singularly inspiring, something about the way she speaks.
I've never really known what to make of the Paris Commune: Did it succeed (by coming into existence), did it fail (by falling to the Versaillais) or did it simply not last long enough to say either way?
I don't think this book has really resolved this as people’s accounts differ, but it's interesting all the same.
This slim book is a unique historical document. Short pieces from various participants make up most of the book. I have only a vague idea of how the commune played out, and now need to go deeper.
Paris Komününe ilgi duyuyorsanız başlangıç için oldukça iyi bir kitap olabilir.Birinci dereden komüne tanık olanların hem özeleştiriyle hem övünçleriyle sorular ekseninde cevaplarını barındırıyor.