I read this book primarily because Karin Lowachee contributed to it and her Warchild series are my favorite books in the world. Also, as a ecology major and all around nerd, I thought the idea of a fantasy bestiary sounded awesome. Unfortunately, I feel like it failed to live up to my expectations. The whole book had a strange tone to it-dark for the sole purpose of being dark (excluding Lowachee's story, which read more like an actual naturalist observation-well written, but not all that exciting, unfortunately).
Excluding a handful of stories, all the stories seemed to be rather dark and fatalistic, as if the authors thought beasts are only interesting if they have tragic stories associated with them, or are a menace to society or themselves. Some of the stories were creative, but honestly, I'm not a fan of darkness for the sake of darkness, and I wish there were a few lighthearted entries to break up the monotony.
On the whole, I don't want to say that the book was bad, because I think it just ended up not being my cup of tea, and I'm still not entirely sure why. I love short stories, I love fantasy and I love animals, so I don't know why putting them together inexplicably did not work for me. I'm beginning to think that when it comes to imaginary creatures, perhaps less is more. I think that a lot of these creatures would have packed more of a punch as a mysterious, semi-explained feature in an actual story. I think what didn't work for me was the abundance of explanation and the fact that, although some of the entries contained stories, these entries were not really short stories, but rather part story, part scientific observation, part diary, and entirely confusing.
I know this sounds negative, but I don't want to discourage people from reading it. If this is your thing, you'll really really like it, but a combination of my own personal preferences and my mood when I read it just made it not work for me personally.