Xenophon's Retreat: Greece, Persia and the End of the Golden Age

by Robin Waterfield

It is 401 BC. After an epic battle in Persia, Xenophon is elected general of the defeated Greek army and must lead the men on a fraught journey back home - a journey of hundreds of miles, north from modern-day Iraq into the mountains of Kurdistan and Armenia, and down to the coast of the Black Sea, fighting all the way, harried on all sides by Persian forces, wild mountain tribesmen, and a bitter winter...

A gripping adventure full of drama, human interest, strong characters, pathos, and triumph.

Genres: History, Nonfiction, Ancient History, Biography, War, Classics, Military Fiction

352 pages, Paperback

First published January 1, 2006

About the author

Robin Anthony Herschel Waterfield is a British classical scholar, translator, editor, and writer of children's fiction.

Reviews

[Percy Blakeney · Rating 5 out of 5]

An amaaaaazingly fluid read, with lots of information too. Well writen and with an excellent Bibliography and sources section.

[Michael · Rating 4 out of 5]

Waterfield does a wonderful job of providing context for Anabasis. In a work with helpful notes, maps, and references, the author has not only reconstructed the route of the 10,000 (to the extent that can be done) but also travelled it. In my paperback edition, the photographs are poorly reproduced, and the binding obscures parts of the maps, but the narrative more than makes up for these problems. In a critical reading of Anabasis, Waterfield brings the work to life and provides an excellent analysis of its meaning at the time of its writing and through history. He regards Xenophon's book as a work of philosophy and political theory as well as a work of history and an exciting tale of adventure and uses it as a way of describing the transition from the Golden Age Zeitgeist of 5th century B.C. to the more realistic and sober spirit of the 4th century. He attributes Alexander's ambition to conquer the Persian Empire directly to his reading of Xenophon. For those who have read Anabasis (or suffered through translating it in Greek classes), Xenophon's Retreat serves as a useful and enriching commentary. For those who have never read Xenophon, Waterfield's work provides an inspiration to do so. the author's translation is available as The Expedition of Cyrus.

[Terri · Rating 2 out of 5]

I expected so much more from this book. And there really isn't anything to say about why I was disappointed because my reasons are the same as the other reviewers here. Terms that have already been covered such as 'choppy' and backwards and forwards are words I would have used myself. The book has it's good points, but on a whole you spend most of time not knowing what year you are in, or what character from history you are reading about now.
It's higgledy piggledy and all over the place and I only made it passed halfway before I gave up and stopped trying to work out what, where and when and WHY?

[Steve · Rating 3 out of 5]

An odd mix of history, travel book, and lit. crit. Looking back on this, I think it was a mistake not to have first read Xenophon's book. That said, the narrative flow is interrupted any number of times by Waterfield's digressions (sometimes fascinating, sometimes boring), which makes for one choppy read.

[Patrick · Rating 3 out of 5]

This is probably best read as an adjunct or commentary to Waterfield's translation of the Anabasis, since it jumps around in Xenophon's story and material could seem confusing, irrelevant or spoilery to someone who had not already read the source.

[Ted · Rating 5 out of 5]

Fabulous read. One of my all time favorites.

[Lukerik · Rating 4 out of 5]

This is essentially an extended footnote to Xenophon's Anabasis. I think it may well be the best footnote I've ever read, and believe me, I've read a few. I would recommend you read Anabasis first. It's great literature. There's a good translation by Dakyns on Project Gutenberg. No notes, but if you have Xenophon's Retreat you won't need them. That said, I understand Waterfield has done his own. I should imagine it's rather good. More than 20 years ago someone told me Republic was a good read, so I obtained a copy (it just happened to be Waterfield's translation) and that was the start of my love affair with ancient Greece. A couple of years ago I read someone else's translation of Republic and it was plodding and boring. None of the zing and pzzazz Plato should have. If I'd read that first I probably wouldn't have continued.

Anyway, this is a very well structured book. Waterfield uses the same necklace approach as does Herodotus, with the story of the expedition forming the chain of the book and with sections on a great variety of subjects depending from it, steadily building up a picture of the world. He makes firm statements about what happened using inference and supposition from the meagre evidence we possess. The book thereby has narrative drive and there is an excellent bibliography for those who wish to explore the controversies of history. Waterfield's opinion though and sensible and well informed.

The 2006 F&F paperback looks good but the spine is poorly constructed. Caveat emptor.

[Andy · Rating 5 out of 5]

After reading Waterfields translation of the Expedition of Cyrus and still needing some modern scholarship to educate me further, I read this wonderful narrative. Waterfield in one small book was able to not only deep dive the March of Xenophon (Waterfield did his own quest and provides pictures) he gave a great view into the world of Xenophon, Sparta, Persia, battle and culture. One can learn a lot about the Classical World just by reading this. Also I recommend reading after reading the primary source just because it helps fill gaps or explain nuance better.

[Sully Augustine · Rating 2 out of 5]

I struggled through a library softbound over the course of the past three weeks or so. Enough parts were interesting to keep me at it, but as a whole it's poorly organized, vaguely following a timeline but with so many digressions and details with respect to so many obscure characters that the overall history was hard to follow.

[Joaco Destéfano]

Mal escrito, bien investigado.

[Ron Oltmanns · Rating 4 out of 5]

If you haven't read Xenophon's Anabasis yourself, make that the first item of business. Get a copy in a language you understand well and read it through. Then, get this book and gain an appreciation for more of the story, background, territory, history, the context and even Waterfield's own travels over most of the route that the 10,000 took. It will make the story come alive and deepen your appreciation for it. Then re-read the Anabasis and you'll have a much richer experience. Mortimer Adler said good books are worth reading three times, and really good books are. Waterfield will help you gain more from Xenophon's March Upcountry (Anabasis).

[Raro de Concurso · Rating 3 out of 5]

No podría hacer una breve descripción de lo que me ha parecido este libro mejor que la que hay en esta página, en el resumen que se hace del mismo.
Una sabia combinación entre erudición (muy contenida), batallitas históricas y libro de viajes. Aunque en este último aspecto, para mi gusto, debería haberse explayado mucho más.

[Rachel Bonaccorso Lindsay · Rating 5 out of 5]

I thought this was a very helpful discussion of the Anabasis and surrounding political and social issues. When I moved on from this to a reading of Xenophon, I was much better prepared to appreciate the significance of the event, and to read a little deeper into Xenophon's narrative.

[Steve Groves · Rating 4 out of 5]

Some great background and insights to the work of Xenephon. The author knows his material well and also had the advantage of following the route of the Ten Thousand to really help bring the first narrative of war alive.

[George Sr. · Rating 5 out of 5]

The retreat of the 10,000 is one of the most gripping stories of survival to come from Classical Greece. Waterfield gives an excellent summary and analysis of the narrative.

[Adam McPhee · Rating 5 out of 5]

Alexander stole Xenophon's valour. Xenophon is the one who came up with that closing in trick to kill cavalry, he should be the one called the Great. Great book.

[Mike · Rating 5 out of 5]

Loved this book. Fantastic description of hoplites, war, society and historical characters. Probably the most descriptive book Ive read on Greek and Persian history.

[Pablo · Rating 4 out of 5]

Un muy buen libro , que relata no solo la gesta de los "Cirianos" si no tambien da un panorama complejo pero entendible del conflicto entre oriente y occidente

[Commander Law · Rating 3 out of 5]

Second go at this. A mixed inconsistent book that doesn't seem entirely sure where it's focus is. Second go didn't make it any clearer.