I received this book free in exchange for an honest review.
Three caveats for this review:
1. I have a penchant for history and historical revisionism tends to set my teeth on edge.
2. This review treats the novel not as erotica in any form but as a narrative with erotic elements.
3. As this is the first book in a trilogy, my review will ignore the "incomplete" feeling that comes from such books.
I suppose I expected slightly more than I received in this story, but it was not at all unacceptable.
Characters: there are three NAMED characters. We have Abigail, the accused witch; Governor Jameson, the "inquisitor" who examines her; and, at the very end, Rebecca, the next accused witch to be inspected. Small cast of characters typically give the reader ample opportunity to become familiar, dare I say, intimate with the characters. We should expect to learn their motivations, their natures, and perhaps even develop some kind of empathy for them...or at least sympathy and understanding. This was not the case here. We know as much at the beginning of the narrative as we do at the end about all of the named characters. This is part of that feeling I received less than I expected from the plot.
Plot: Salem Witch Trials turned on their heads...Holy Inquisition with the lust being a positive instead of a negative.... I have read worse re-imaginings of the Burning Times (as neo-pagans call the witch hunts/Inquisition), so the plot was actually the best part even if my teeth ached from the reversal. Let me be clear: the author displays a true sense of the horror of the witch craze and I think that, with some better character development/growth, the plot would improve to a point where this novel COULD stand alone as well as begin a trilogy. My sense is that too much is going to depend on the second and third book to fill out Abigail and Governor Jameson.
Narrative structure: I absolutely positively and without reservation despise the omniscient narrator. It removes the reader from the story, never allowing the characters to give their own insights into the plot, and spoiling development because we know everything. It was the narrative structure itself that deprived this book of the fifth star. I can ignore the characters' lack of development, and I can accept that I expect more character-driven plot, but the fact that the reader can read the characters' minds pushes me away faster than anything.
Eroticism: The strange thing for me about this story was that the erotic elements almost became a distraction after a time. By the time both primary characters sate themselves on each other, it is almost anti-climactic (pun not completely accidental). He sees a "mark" but he doesn't. She is lying but she is not. She is "broken" but she is not. He wants her but he does not. She is wanton but she is not. He is carnal but he is not. I will not spoil the plot any more than I have here, but suffice that some of the things Governor Jameson does to her ARE right out of the Witch's Hammer, which (for me) actually makes the narrative better.
Overall, I recommend this book with the reservations of poor character development and the infernal omniscient narrator. I am strongly considering the sequel "The Accused" simply because I *do* want to see what happens with Rebecca, see if my prediction about Governor Jameson's behavior is accurate, and just because I do want to get more depth on Abigail's personality now that things have changed for her as a result of her examination.