Revised review, of a wonderful book
I owe the author of this book a sincere and heartfelt apology. The apology is for the conclusions I drew and expressed regarding her motivations, conclusions that were clearly wrong. I realize apologies aren't always enough but offer mine just the same.
Ms. McPhail, I apologize
I had previously written a highly critical review of this book when my reading of the text led me to the conclusion that a female character had been raped and that act had been glorified. The author graciously clarified her intention and understood that while there may have been some confusion created by the dialog, which she took the time to clarify and update, the interaction wasn't intended to portray a rape but a consensual act, a choice, and as a result I've edited my review.
Spoilers Below:
While the style, poetry and complexity of the authors writing remained the same if not better, the content of this third book somehow felt darker and more violent which created some discomfort for me. My lack of comfort with the darker content of this book poses an issue. While it's not comfortable, the story is so well crafted, the ideas so challenging, I care so much for the individual characters, I can't help but want to know how their tale unfolds.
The concept of this book was supposed to be patterns of shadow and light, it *felt* much more dark than light on balance. Thus far, for most characters to stay on their "Path" they must endure extreme pain and sacrifice, which is fine but I felt the book spent a lot of time showing the sacrifice but too little time exploring just why that sacrifice was worthwhile.
The Isabel story-line is a good example for the "worth it" question not being asked or answered... What goodness is there in Isabel's life that makes the continued sacrifices she and Ean keep making worth it? I don't know, they seem convinced the sacrifices are worth it....they seem committed to continue to make the sacrifices but I have no earthly idea why its worth it. Isabel sacrifices her body and the mortal love of her soul mate Ean, to remain on her "path". While I know Isabel believed the sacrifice was necessary to stay on her path, and her path for the game,why?...does this mean staying on your path and being happy are mutually exclusive? If staying on your path and being happy are mutually exclusive..who the heck cares if you win the game that requires you stay on a path to unhappiness.
In contrast the "worth it" does get answered by in the Tanis story-line, by far the best in the book, a great mix of light and dark.... the sheer joy in his exploration of life, coming to love, discovery of his family clearly demonstrates why following the path, seeing this hard thing through is worth the cost.
The Pelas story-line still bothers me immensely - I still believe Pelas is portrayed as far too perfect, with every adjective use to describe him, by every person. Worse, currently he is literally responsible for nothing he's ever done. I assume that dynamic will change. Perhaps my feeling that Pelas life has no cost or consequences is a sign that I still hold some lingering animosity over his interactions with Isabel and what it cost her, but I honestly believe it's more.
I think I've figured out why....Living a life should cause some ripple, some change good and bad, with some accounting..and that accounting should include both consequences and rewards for your choices. Even the most perfect creatures, even Pelas should have some accounting--some loss, some gain,some regret, some joy, some debt owed, some balance due. Thus far, all of Pelas's accounting seems to have been placed on plus side of the ledger, all debts assigned to another.
By the way the Pelas story has unfolded he gets to jump right into the middle of the story and life with all the rewards The love of (Isabel & Tanis) and none of the consequences of a life lived. The two most wonderful people in the book are willing to give anything for him. Willing to give anything despite what the cost or how much more others have already sacrificed and contributed to and for them, withdraws on an account with no deposits. It feels..I'll say it...unjust, a reward for who/what he is not what he's done, a golden child. It seems unfair to those who have ALREADY sacrificed then seem to be cast aside, sacrificed or forgotten in consideration for what Pelas is or might do in the future. Pelas receives an account overflowing, while others like Ean, accounts seem empty. (heck he was absent from the last 1/4 of the book)
I hope Pelas taking away Tanis's right to choose, buy bonding with him, though he new he should, without telling him about the interaction with his mother at least starts the process of him having an account with both debts and credits, like everyone else.
My fear is that this will become a story about Pelas, with him becoming the savior/hero claiming eternity of happiness with heroine in reward. Happiness and reward so many others, who already have sacrificed more or everything were denied in the end. At first thought this concern was because I harbored some resentment for him but I realize it's because the other, less perfect, struggling people have always just resonated more with me. Perhaps I just can't help rooting for the underdog, those who persevere despite having none of the advantages of being a perfect.
I hope the next book focuses not on how the game can be won, but more why it's worth winning. If that takes place, I imagine it won't seem so dark..
If you can't tell, I loved the book and the series...these aren't complaints ...call it challenging passion.