Amateur historian R.W. Dick Phillips has taken on the task of rediscovering the life and legacy of the Scottish-born Revolutionary War General and American Statesman Arthur St. Clair, while at the same time chronicling his family genealogy with facts on the Sinclair and St. Clair clans. Apart from a rather unique way of bullet pointing the highlights of St. Clair’s accomplishments and triumphs in the opening, it becomes quite apparent from the Preface, Introduction, and Chapter One that there are minor editing issues that have gone overlooked, as well as a general repetitive theme of grandstanding the Founder as an often undervalued and faultless hero, slighted by politics and forgotten to history. It is also made clear that the heirs and the present generation of Sinclair and St. Clair families have heavily endorsed and approved this biographical undertaking, which could lead the reader to be mindful of a potential bias in favor of their illustrious ancestor.
The book can be read rather quickly, with short chapters and separated parts that focus on different aspects of St. Clair’s life, but it can be quite confusing as Phillips fails to keep it chronologically structured. He begins with the Scottish ancestry and background of the Scottish Freemasons that St. Clair himself would eventually become a member of, and yet jumps in time from the next chapter to brief facts and events of his Congressional Presidency tenure of 1787, completely missing his journey of coming to America that Phillips set out to unfold.
Along with countless spelling and grammatical errors littered throughout which can be blamed on the publisher as previously mentioned, Phillips’ work can be all too repetitive—with constant reminders of his Scottish heritage being brought in to focus throughout the biography, themes of him being overlooked and dwarfed when compared to other soldiers and leaders, as well as perhaps overstating his friendship and bond with George Washington time and time again. The most frustrating aspect of the above mentioned faults as well as subsequent chapters on St. Clair’s military engagements is the fact that Phillips does not substantiate on relatively anything. He makes broad statements throughout the text indicating that St. Clair distinguished himself in the French and Indian War—with no further follow up or elaboration—or more specifically the repeated assertion that Washington “had already developed a respect for his courage in battle”, without going into any specific detail of the battles themselves:
Not that there is the slightest doubt about George Washington’s greatness, but if there were, the years spent researching Arthur St. Clair’s relationship with Washington during and after the Revolution would have certainly obliterated it.
Most Americans really have no idea of the trust that existed between Washington and St. Clair and how they often counted upon one another to help solve major problems. Perhaps it has been in deference to Washington’s dozens of other generals that historians have seldom acknowledged the lifelong trust and mutual interdependence that existed between Washington and St. Clair; but they were much closer than people realize..
Sadly, the only time that Phillips actually goes into detail on any one of St. Clair’s military excursions is when he is boldly quoting from a previous biography on St. Clair, or from another general history like McCullough’s 1776, and recent biographies on George Washington and Nathanael Greene. He could take the time to check the sources used from such works and then reevaluate them in his own method and style, yet instead he paraphrases them, and we are yet again left with broad and vague assertions on a General whom unfortunately becomes more obscure as the biography continues. Even in the second half of the book, the reader still loses focus as one chapter explains his decision to retreat from Ticonderoga in 1777, yet the following chapter explains a brief account of St. Clair’s political career in Pennsylvania in 1771 and his subsequent participation in Dunmore’s War, to which there is no explanation for this glimpse back to his earlier years—one of many tangents that are all too frequent in The Invisible Patriot.
Unsurprisingly, Phillips takes an apologetic and defensive stance of St. Clair’s catastrophic blunder with the Native American threat in the Wabash in 1791, going as far as to call for extortion charges for then Secretary of War Henry Knox. Disregarding the bias, this is the moment where the biography could shine—yet Phillips misses the opportunity to go into the actual grit and terror of the battle—nor does he go into detail to discuss the inadequacy and lack of men and supplies that he mostly points the blame at. Illustrations are provided throughout the text, though sources listed at the end are scarce and should be considered with hesitation—the passion and admiration is fully evident—but nonetheless, this is a biography that should be avoided.