Journalism entered the twenty-first century caught in a paradox. The world had more journalism, across a wider range of media, than at any time since the birth of the western free press in the eighteenth century. Western journalists had found themselves under a cloud of from politicians, philosophers, the general public, anti-globalization radicals, religious groups, and even from fellow journalists. Critics argued that the news industry had lost itsmoral bearings, focusing on high investment returns rather than reporting and analysing the political, economic, and social issues of the day.Journalism has a central and profound impact on our worldview; we find it everywhere from newspapers and television, to radio and the Internet. In the new edition of this thought-provoking and provocative Very Short Introduction, Ian Hargreaves examines the world of contemporary journalism. By looking not only at what journalism has been in the past, but also what it is becoming in the digital age, he examines the big issues relating to reportage, warfare, celebrity culture, privacy,and technology worldwide.ABOUT THE The Very Short Introductions series from Oxford University Press contains hundreds of titles in almost every subject area. These pocket-sized books are the perfect way to get ahead in a new subject quickly. Our expert authors combine facts, analysis, perspective, new ideas, and enthusiasm to make interesting and challenging topics highly readable.
ترجمع از نازنین برادران. نوشته روان نبود. میشود گفت که مترجم علاقهای به کارش نداشته. همانطور که از اسم کتاب پیداست، توضیحات کوتاهی راجع به خیلی چیزها در ژورنالیسم میدهد. که برخی جالب هستند، بعضی هم خسته کننده. برای درک اولیه روابط اجتماع، حکومت، جهان، و ژورنالیسم خوب است! بطور کلی نیاز به حوصله دارد خوانداش
I really enjoyed reading this book. I am interested in being a photojournalist someday and this really gave me some good insight on what my future may look like. It has given me a good perspective on what I need to be thinking about as I am moving forward in this career. In our world history, there are plenty of examples of journalist being criticized either drastically resulting in their deaths or minor criticism. Journalists are revolutionists in a way. They fight to be heard and when they are heard, wars can start with the information that is spread through their reporting. I love the point made within the book that "Journalism is a domain of moral choices, occasionally involving a melodramatic interplay between good and evil." There needs to be a balance between the two especially when it comes to being a journalist and even in expressing one's self.
Yes, this is a brief introduction, but i expected that. It jumps into the history of journalism which started when individualism came into effect. When people felt it important to express themselves. These recordings whether they be in art or literature were powerful ways of changing the perspectives of their society.
Isn't quite a short introduction to journalism but rather an introduction to journalism history. Doesn't really debate any of the ideals or values behind journalism to any meaningful extent, focuses on the development of the journalistic business and how it's adapting. Not a bad book if that's what you're expecting from it but quite a disappointing read for what you usually expect from these very short introductions.
Solid stuff. As pretty much everyone reads stuff by journalists on a reasonably frequent, even if not regular, basis, it's worth everyone's time to consider its purpose and practice, even if you have no intention of being a journalist yourself.
Introduction: Waiting for the endgame Chapter 1: Born free: a brief history of news media Chapter 2: Big Brother: journalism and the altered state Chapter 3: The first casualty: journalists at war Chapter 4: Star-struck: journalism as entertainment Chapter 5: Up to a point, Lord Copper's: who owns journalists? Chapter 6: Hacks vs flaks: journalism and public relations Chapter 7: Murder is my meat: the ethics of journalism Chapter 8: Digital: after the deluge
Everything about this book was short! I borrowed it from a friend for 3 days, finished it in 2 nights, and the title itself is very short.
As a business professional working in a media organization, I wanted to get a quick overview of the journalism field. This book does the job without getting into too much details.
Media studies isn't my area, so I'm not really qualified to judge this book. That said, I did find it clear and engaging, and am confident I could use it as a starting place for more in-depth reading.
I'm giving this author a big five stars because I thought I knew about this subject, and he surprised me. He did a lot of research and explained things clearly, and I like how he cares about the ideal of being a journalist.
Journalism has been attacked recently from within and without. This book - although published in 2005 (written in 2003) - gives an overview of journalism in these trying times, and a history of its past. Whilst there is a mention of the dot-com bubble the later changes caused by the internet are missing, as you would expect from a book published 15 years ago.
A useful start if you are interested in journalism.
I had to read this book for my course at university, but I found it surprisingly interesting. I must admit, I didn't necessarily enjoy this book, but I did find some of the subject matter interesting.
Vond het heel interessant, kwam er alleen niet super makkelijk doorheen. Heb wel veel geleerd over de geschiedenis van kranten en online nieuws zoals Buzzfeed en de Huffington Post.
The fact that this was written more than 20 years ago is what makes it interesting: it’s a snapshot of a moment in journalism’s history when it was just starting to become what it fully is today.
I agree with other reviews that say the title is a little bit misleading. This wasn’t a bad book, but it definitely isn’t a GREAT one. Overall, I learned a few things on the history of journalism, but nothing extraordinary.