In my review of Rogue Male, I commented that if all Household's work was of a similar quality, he deserved a full-scale revival. Well, Hostage:London didn't have the Platonic purity of the former work, so it felt a little less intense although the actual stakes were even higher. However, the larger supporting cast aside, this was in every way as deft and taut a thriller as Rogue Male, and as informed with larger themes, justifying Household's own description of his work as a mix of Conrad and Buchan.
It's interesting reading this novel 34 years after its initial publication, in an era that is even more defined by the constant threat of terrorism. The terrorist group in this novel hopes to detonate a nuclear bomb in London, forcing the authorities to impose a police state which in turn will help inspire a New Revolution. In reality, we've found that the tightening-up of security measures in the wake of terorrist attacks on prominent locations, including London, and closer home, Bombay, has been accepted, albeit not always with good grace. We grumble about being searched at airports and shopping malls, but we don't really seem to do much more about it than that. People by and large are content to trade a certain amount of liberty for apparent gains in security. Magma, the underground organisation in this novel, may well have overestimated the efficacy of their plan, another reason why acts of terror are fundamentally futile if not counter-productive.
Also, Household offers an eloquent and quite definitive argument against torture during the course of this novel, noting in his common-sensical way that if the torturer knew enough to tell which of the many grasping confessions offered in extremity were reliable, he would know enough that torture was not necessary in the first place. He goes on to say that torture can only work on those who have no strong ideals and nothing to gain except the cessation of pain; clearly not an apt description of a fanatical militant.
Household also offers us a comment on various forms of ideology, and a tense, gripping narrative which delivers a great deal of suspense and thrills, questions the nature of idealism and loyalty and offers no easy answers. The ending is superbly bleak and left me feeling quite drained. A Household revival begins to look more and more necessary. I'd take this novel over many of the fictional engagements with terrorism and idealism currently being churned out.