Spent the last year in the Pentateuch doing a daily (or almost daily) bible study with this commentary. I enjoyed this and will continue into the next volume of Joshua-Esther.
Pros:
This book challenged me to ask deeper questions and gave me answers to things I was already wondering when reading the scriptures. Wiersbe doesn’t stray away from addressing difficult topics found in the first 5 books of the Bible and when reading a commentary I value that aspect. He made connections throughout the Bible that were relevant to each passage and some connections I had never known or even considered were brought up which of course made me want to dive even deeper into studying the Bible. Wiersbe is easy to understand and uses everyday common language that the average lay person could easily pick up and be blessed by. I admire Wiersbe’s dedication to these commentaries and the insight he provides to stay as true to the biblical text as possible. Wiersbe always brings it back to Jesus and the gospel. Almost every chapter in this volume of the commentary brought a reference to Jesus and a pointing forward to (at the time the Pentateuch was written) the coming Messiah. Wiersbe stresses faith, love, repentance, obedience and a correct zeal for seeking and knowing God. I loved reading this volume and look forward to reading the next one!
Cons:
There were some cons but they are few and far between and mostly personal preference I think. Wiersbe at times will say things that feel like assumptions with certainty. I don’t love this aspect because I don’t want to make light assumptions when it comes to scripture. I don’t like when pastors or authors pull from the text more than what is actually there and make assumptions about what the people said or thought. However I can see how at times this can be ok to wonder about and I know this is a commentary but to state it as true can be dangerous and lead people into incorrect assumptions about written scripture. This is something I feel strongly about and maybe others feel less convicted on. Also along the same note Wiersbe will use hyperbolic language to get a point across and at times it feels like stepping into a grey area on written truth. Again I know this is a commentary and he is adding it for point of emphasis and slight entertainment but when it comes to the Bible I just want to make sure what I am taking away from it is truth and not a miscalculation or misinterpretation that was conveyed inappropriately by exaggeration or to make the material less dry. If the scripture is dry, and “boring” that’s fine with me just give me the truth so I can better know who God is and His word and have an appropriate reverence and understanding with proper theology. I also wish at times he dove a little deeper into the text but then I know the volume would be twice as long and we’d be looking at a Matthew Henry commentary and this was written for lay people and meant to be easily digestible and it is. I will say even though I wrote an in depth review of the cons they are only minor and the majority of the time this commentary is throughly enriching.
Theological Stance:
Warren Wiersbe was once the pastor at Moody Church in Chicago. He holds to a conservative evangelical theology. He is a premillennial dispensationalist in his eschatological stance from what I read in this volume (So covenantal amillennials will disagree). He holds a high value of scripture and is earnest in commentating on the Bible literally with some hyperbolic language used for emphasis. I also know he also holds to a Baptistic view on Baptism and so those in the traditional reformed tradition would find this to be a point of disagreement.
All in all this is a great volume and I look forward to studying Joshua-Esther in volume 2! I have loved the commentary up to this point!