How Books Can Save Democracy

by Michael Fischer

How Books Can Save Democracy argues that American democracy is in crisis as healthy disagreement has pivoted into negative, winner-take-all contests. Michael Fischer proposes that literature is an essential tool to rekindle the relationships and mutual understanding that functional democracies require.


By participating in reading, writing, and discussions about literature with diverse perspectives—whether in classrooms or book clubs or at public festivals—we can discover how to embrace our differences rather than fear them, enabling the empathy and collaborative spirit needed to sustain a democratic society.

How Books Can Save Democracy illustrates how literature, from classics to contemporary works, fosters nuanced thinking and the ability to find common ground despite our differences. Fischer draws insightful connections and examines how great literature throughout history has diagnosed societal democratic challenges, discussing the works of Zadie Smith, Charles Dickens, Alexis de Tocqueville, Hannah Arendt, Philip Roth, Ezra Klein, Bishop Desmond Tutu, and many others. For anyone concerned about polarization and democratic backsliding, he provides evidence that the reading, writing, and discussion of powerful texts may be our most valuable and overlooked democratic resource.

How Books Can Save Democracy is essential reading for educators, community leaders, and anyone concerned about the future of American democracy. Now more than ever we need works of literature to help us benefit from our differences instead of being threatened by them, and our bookshelves may hold the solution to this pressing civic challenge.

Genres: Nonfiction, Politics

78 pages, Kindle Edition

Published September 9, 2025

Reviews

[Jean Kojali]

When I saw this slim volume in the bookstore the other day, I didn't need to read the back cover's summary to know that I was going to buy it. Yes, please, give me another essay combining elements of literary theory and political science. I quickly looked up a bio of the author, clarified he is a real and credentialed person, went to the checkout counter, and walked out happy and intrigued with this find. Later that day I read this in one sitting, but I have not been able to stop thinking about what was said (and what wasn't) here. Although this book - really more of a tract - is just under eighty pages, it brought out a lot of emotions in me, both pleasant and not.

Considering that what I write here will constitute this book's first review on Goodreads (an honour, I think?), I am weary of allowing this to turn into a political rant. I am not interested in publicly espousing my political opinions on the interent, at least in detail. However -this book was so close to doing so many things well, but there was a layer of restraint applied to almost every meaningful, contemporary issue brought up here, so to not express my frustration would feel dishonest. My biggest problem with this book is that it does not dare to call things what they are - whether subdued or pensive. For example, Fischer does not use President Trump's name at all throughout the text. I think this is a mistake, especially since other political figures are named. Just because we all may know the one who denied the results of an election and instigated an insurrection on this nation's capitol, does not mean we should neglect his name - it needs to be printed and printed a million times over in explicit association with the destruction it wrought on our history. Further, there is no mention of the GOP-led assault on the first amendment in this country. For a book that seeks to defend all books, how is it possible not to discuss this!? By using the word 'save' in the present tense, the title of this book correctly implies that democracy is, in fact, in peril and under direct assault. Under such circumstances, shouldn't we seek to identify problems by their origin, their instigator, and their henchmen? Who and what are we protecting by not?

I would like to see this expanded into a full length book - I think the ideas are promising and the empathy that pulses throughout the whole narrative is necessary and refreshing. More exposition is deserved. However, unfortunately, I do not think the both sides-ism approach is conducive to the topics discussed here. One side bans books, and one doesn't. Call it for what it is. Vague rhetoric and having conversations about having conversations is not enough anymore.

[Ginger · Rating 2 out of 5]

I assume most who pick up this slim booklet buy into the premise embedded in the title, that books can save democracy, and therefore that democracy could be or is at risk. Yet the author spends over 40 pages establishing that democracy is at risk, and only 20 or so pages loosely convincing us that books could be the solution. How that is, as implied by the “How” in the title is barely touched until the very end—the last 4-5 pages.

I was disappointed.

[Kelsey · Rating 4 out of 5]

I enjoyed this little introduction on the importance of reading and analyzing literature in order to cultivate and practice essential skills that are required for a society to successfully create/maintain democracy. As an avid reader myself, I don't think there was anything shocking or surprising, but I did appreciate the historical research the author gave. I do wish there had been more time spent on the actual thesis of how books can save democracy - the vast majority of the book (minus about 10-15 pages) focused more on historical context and background, when, while interesting and important, I would have liked a longer second chapter that delved a bit deeper. That said, the author provided numerous book recommendations that seem to expand on this topic, and I understand that this was a short essay designed as a primer.

[Neoson · Rating 5 out of 5]

This book is a good beginning of understanding the importance of literature. In a world consumed by polarization and hatred, giving way to corruption, it's so easy for reading to fall to the wayside. With the direction the US is going, it is no wonder why so many think reading is boring or that literature classes are a waste of time, something worsened by the ever increasing presence of technology. But ChatGPT can't replace thinking, and this book is a fantastic explanation of how we need to rely on physical words more. If anything, this book feels more like a sociological paper than a book, yet nothing is lost in that.

[Orlando Herrera · Rating 4 out of 5]

“Good fiction pulls off a magic trick of absurd power: It makes us care.”

I am a better man because of books.

Books can shape the world. They can shape you. It is no surprise that literature is so intrinsically connected to democracy. Books open the door to discussion, to conversation, to perspectives we would have never encountered otherwise. And what is democracy, if not a discussion? A conversation among different points of view?

The stories I’ve read are my own now. They travel with me wherever I go, subtly shifting the way I see the world. I have felt every emotion and lived a kaleidoscope of experiences through them. I have lived hundreds of lives in one because of books. What a privilege it is to be part of this unending flow of stories, waiting to be read.

My curiosity and hunger for these stories will never be fully satisfied. To drink from books is a sweet, never-ending thirst; an ache that calls us back to our humanity.

I love books.

[Reed · Rating 3 out of 5]

I like how this is a small book that can be placed in a back pocket and be read in under 45 min. The premise is strong; and all readers so wish the central thesis is true.

Having said that, the argument is slim, and almost seems an afterthought, not appearing until the very end.

My main learn: the author emphasizes the value of discourse between 2 or more characters with opposing views. While he starts off by referencing a relatively obscure short story by Zadie Smith (when he could have chosen Plato or myriad other examples), discourse between characters is a useful construct for showing how to respect opposing viewpoints.

[Knox Isham · Rating 4 out of 5]

Succinct and compelling look into what's impacting our democracy today, warning signs and comparisons.

Interesting takes on how people can find more compassion through study and conversation.

If hatred can gather momentum and spread, so can compassion and understanding. Our democracy depends on it.

[Amy Grossman · Rating 5 out of 5]

A small but might book that is so important and relevant in our current political and personal communications in society.