As the penultimate novel in Salvatore's Dark Elf trilogy, the book explores the origins of the legendary Drow ranger, Drizzt Do'Urden. The great benefit of rereading books is that they provide new insights, or one simply notices new things through each different reading.
The theme of freedom was so ubiquitous in the novel that I cannot see how I didn't see it through the first few readings. To survive for nearly a decade in the Underdark, where dangers lurk around every corner, Drizzt subsumes his personality into one of pure warrior instinct, an alter-ego known as the Hunter. Through the Hunter, Drizzt achieves levels of pure fighting prowess which exceed even that of his finely honed, conscious skill with the blade. But he also loses himself in his alternate persona, becoming one with his natural environment, the ever-dangerous Underdark, at one point coming close to violating the very principles on which he bases his individuality and the unique code of morals which sets him apart from his people.
The antagonist of the novel is a figure from Drizzt's own past, who, in large part, embodies the very high principles which Drizzt strives to uphold. Like Drizzt, much of this shadow warrior's personality is submerged beneath a living (sort of) facade of pure fighting brilliance; and which threatens to overtake his very personality and even lead to the destruction of that which he holds most dear. The shadow warrior is thus perhaps a precursor to Artemis Entreri, the main antagonist of the Icewind Dale trilogy, and later sometime anti-hero protagonist of future novels.
Another figure, one of Drizzt's own companions, embodies the struggle of maintaining own's own personality despite outside influences, a former peck, a sort of deep gnome, who has been transformed into a Hook Horror, a dangerous creature of the Underdark. Over time, the peck loses more and more of his former identity as a peck and comes to take on more of the personality and habits of a hook horror.
What do all these elements of the story have in common? As far as I can tell, they provide an extended reflection on the difficulties of resisting outside influences, whether they be societal (Drizzt), instinctual (Drizzt), magically imposed (Clacker/Zaknafein), or moral (Zaknafein/Drizzt). Is it possible to imagine a self that can choose any and all aspects of their own identity? Or would such a person be a shapeless ghost, without form or any sort of shape, or emotions, or beliefs? To a large extent, individuals must have the power to choose which communities they belong to, and trying to force communal claims onto others is surely an evil. To tell someone that they must believe this or that because they're female, or Hispanic, or American is surely to hoist communal claims onto them which the individual doing so surely has little grounds for so doing. That women *must* have children in order to identify as women is surely debatable, and hence not something that anyone has any right telling someone that they must do or believe in order to be female. Surely, it's fine to believe such a thing about being a woman; it's when someone takes the next step and bullies others into behaving in conformity with the bully's belief that makes such action intolerable, or otherwise more deserving of a 1984-esque society rather than a democratic one.