Terry Pratchett is a publishing phenomenon. Every new book becomes a best-seller, and every book gains him more fans. Despite this — or perhaps because of it — he has not been taken seriously by critics, even though some reviewers have, as he has said, "accused him of literature". This collection of studies covers the whole range of Pratchett's writings, from The Carpet People to The Fifth Elephant, and includes essays by critics such as John Clute and Andy Sawyer, and children's author Cherith Baldry. Introduction by David Langford.
Not deep, but sweet. More of a “what Pratchett was talking about”, less a hard look at what meaning was there. A labor of love. A nice distraction; don’t feel like I learned much. Validating, I suppose. That these scholars agree with me that these books are worth reading.
Pulls out one of my favorite quotes from the Hogfather, after Susan realizes that the sun would have risen the next day; it just would have been a big ball of flaming gas:
“All right,” said Susan. “I’m not stupid. You’re saying humans need . . . fantasies to make life bearable.” REALLY? AS IF IT WAS SOME KIND OF PINK PILL? NO. HUMANS NEED FANTASY TO BE HUMAN. TO BE THE PLACE WHERE THE FALLING ANGEL MEETS THE RISING APE. “Tooth Fairies? Hogfathers? Little –“ YES. AS PRACTICE. YOU HAVE TO START OUT LEARNING TO BELIEVE THE LITTLE LIES.” “So we can believe the big ones?” YES. JUSTICE. MERCY. DUTY. THAT SORT OF THING.
And in the end, it’s death who saves us from extinction.
I am still just dipping into this occasionally, since I have lots of other books in my to-read pile. The 2 or 3 essays I've read so far have been somewhat turgid - sounded a bit like a student term paper trying to sound knowledgeable and patronizing at the same time.