പണ്ട് അതായതു ദാസൻ്റെ പിറവിക്കു മുൻപ് …..These are the first words of the masterpiece born from the pen of M.mukundan. To give such a symbolic and significant introduction to out protagonist, we expect great things from him. But over the course of the story, we are utterly disappointed. In him, as a person, as a son,as a self proclaimed idealist revolutionary. On paper, Dasan has none of the qualities one would attribute to one in whom the readers should connect to. Save for one. His unbending devotion to his ideals. But we learn in many instances that this may be a quality that brings more harm than good.
He contributes next to nothing to the ongoing events. True he was a staunch and active activist who by heart and mind yearned for the liberation of Mayyazhi and her denizens. He was willing to give up a enticing future, and there in his family's hopes and dreams. Even when faced with their broken countenance he was unyielding. Nor his mother and sisters cries, nor his father’s lamentation, nor his dear achamma’s devastation. Even when his actions led his father to all but exile him from home.
As mentioned, Dasan as a protagonist possesses no such qualities. However as a character he is complex and engaging. With his insecurities and failings, he seems almost...human. As if you would have known someone like him, growing up.
And therein lies that triumph of the story. While it boasts a litany of colorful characters, the writer chose Dasan to be his stand in, per say. He is a man of contradictions. There is a saying; ‘one who cannot keep his own house in order, should not venture to do so for his land’ an ideal lived and broken by Mahatma Gandhi, whose family at his deathbed were all but sundered.
Here we see dasan give up all that he holds dear for what he believes in. yet what can he show for it. It was his best friend papan who instigated the revolution, by sorts stabbing the commissar. For the most part kanaran led the revolution. The people of mayyazhi made the french leave.
And dasan, in a moment of familial concern, took on a futile personal mission of great risk which got him captured. He went to prison for a action that was mostly not his own. And despite knowing that may not share a future he allows Chandrika to get close.
For most part Dasan seems a person in battle with himself. Not committing to either self and failing both.A lifetime of bad choices. Why couldn’t he have served his land while serving his family. His renouncing of all his comforts appears as a form of escapism. An hollow idealist who is ready to preach but not willing to act. The sad part is he is not.
As the author, so elegantly put it mayyazhi before dasan, is presented as almost a land borne of myth and folklore. Filled with people who knew to fear the ever encroaching dark, the fickle old gods, and the generous new gods the white men.
The females and some males, who looked upon them in adulation as they would kings and royalty of old. In multiple it is even hinted as such. And males who were weak feeble creatures, obedient, compliant and dare say spineless to the authority. Harbouring like a venereal symptom, their perceived impotence in relation to the white lords.
***********************
Carnal desire gravitates to those in power. this seems to a recurring theme of the narrative. like a corrupted version of evolutionary fitness, here the females look upon their rulers, those who possess immense power over them, also as objects of such passions.
Yet the colonizers are not all mustache swirling villains and fiends. we see several who intermingle and socialize with the people. and through their bonds have become no less the sons and daughters of mayyazhi. a paramour of which, are the noble and respectable lord Leslie and his amiable wife Missy. who look upon the family of Kurumbi, as their own.
An interesting point of divergence, right around the time of dasan's birth. the failings of Leslie and Missy's son Gastone in his marriage, perhaps due to the implied undertone of impotence was the first indicator of the winds of change in the political landscape. prior there was no one mention of defiance among the people against the colonizers.
Another point to note is how kunjananthan, the symbolic icon of the revolution and the intellectual progenitor of many of mayyazhi’s future revolutionaries is introduced immediately after gastone's self imposed confinement.
these men drew parallels, between two cultures. those of the colonizers who were losing their grip in the colonists with the passage of time.
gastone who had almost all a man could wish for, yet choose to throw it away over his one failing. kunjananthan the perpetual hypochondriac lamenting over his several failings in health, but in doing so finds the strength to devote his remaining life force to become the harbinger of change; and for the most part succeeds. how challenges shape us is entirely depending on us. we can either be the recluse gastone, or the enterprising kunjananthan.
like gaston most of the people we meet in mayyazhi do not take well to the abrupt change in years of established regime.some are heartbroken, some angry, some in complete denial.
'the french will retake mayyazhi in a fleet of warships' mused french loyalist unni nair at one point, even when it was clear those days we forever gone. most like them actively are terrified of this concept of independence. yet fear it, stall it, change always arrives.
And it comes unbiased, unprejudiced. Even to the victors. Dasan, pappan, vasooty and kanaran are all affected. Some like soldiers in peacetime lost their will and drive. Some having renounced their armament and achieved their goals moved onto better prospects.
Dasan was the former. No longer driven by the singular desire of freedom he withered away physically and mentally. Using the adoration of chandrika as a crutch as a imitation to the family he lost. Yet he is the acolyte of the goddess of misfortune jyestha. He refuses to let the past die, and hides behind false ideals. He could be one who desires a hundred year revolution to keep his sense and importance intact.
He pushes away those that try to help him, pigheaded in his own brand of ideals. He earns the ire and hatred of those close to him alienating himself further.
A direct opposite to achu, whose past is intentionally shrouded in obscurity. Yet one who undergoes the most drastic change echoing the change in the land. Perhaps having a turbulent upbringing, his desire for something tangible like a family allowed him to turn himself around and become a respectable member of society.
Yet despite all this mayyazhi persists. A silent spectator in the drama of life. Yet she is just as relevant as character as those written. The place, like malgudi before has a identity of its own. The seashore which bears witness to the mystic land where souls transverse as dragonflies.An enduring land, full of people who loved and loved, and lived and lost.
I have not spend time discussing the female cast of characters. But i am afraid doing so would extend this piece by quite a bit. So i am refraining from doing so. Quite regretfully. If in the future i get a chance to rewrite this review, then i shall endeavour for a more holistic and in depth look at them and more.