Book critiques would give it 3 to 3.5 on a 5, but for me it is impossible to be objective and rate it as any other 'book'. I have no way of knowing for sure, the veracity of dialogues presented by the writer, yet I am willing to let it convince me. Not because it makes me positively delusional or complacent about life but it makes sense to me, it just fits in, in the grander scheme of things. I wish I had read it immediately after Brian Weiss's books or Laws of Spirit World. I can't wait to read Elizabeth Kubler-Ross now!
But first, on why I chose to be vocal about this.
There has been enough literature written, peer reviewed, dismissed, debated, accepted and mocked at, regarding the transcendentals of spirituality- the realm which has been subjected to much woo-woo and skepticism. Scientific inquiry has been based on the fundamental principle of falsifiability, which I have come to believe is a serious limitation. Our rational minds reject that which is imperceptible to us. What stands out for me the most is that a whole lot is beyond our perception, yet we remain so materialistic in our research. I am sure jealous when a snake can see colours, a bat can hear sounds and a dog can smell well beyond what I can. Fortunately, I have technological access to it, hence I am willing to believe.
Some of us are naturally liberal and others are quite stringent in our approach to hypothesize. I guess that is ok, to keep human curiosity flourishing in a progressive direction. However, when it comes to unconventional areas like 'afterlife', NDEs, psychokinesis, telepathy and such, we have polar opposite views. The debate no longer stands upon the subject, it immediately morphs into a fight between ego-defined identities. Naturally, those who are willing to agree remain secretive about their positions for the fear of being ridiculed and the vulnerability of being insulted by what they consider to be oblivion or ignorance. Anecdotal evidence makes this knowledge envelope into subjectivity and individualism, but that is all what we have for now. It is quite intriguing that people from different religious backgrounds, geographies, races, cultures, age groups have a similar story to tell from their deepest consciousness.
This particular book is a Q&A between a regressionist and spirits/people hypnotized to time between life and death and answers most logical and commonplace queries about death, existence beyond death, learnings, other planes, higher dimensions, karmic relationships, our concept of God, metaphors of religion and folklore, the significant pervasiveness of pure energy, and the meaning of it all. At times, when she speaks for herself, Dolores moves well along with the reader, trying to comprehend the implications and giving enough space for one's own interpretation. I am still searching for answers to few more questions, as certain chapters have seemingly more areas to explore. The author has less insights and opinions to give of her own which is quite in line with what she intended to do while bringing out this book.
The book is not a philosophical discourse to be rated or debated upon. I am not suggesting that the book be above any scrutiny basing on the widely publicized credentials of the author. I have read terrible pieces of trite filth like Dr. Eben Alexander and have been thoroughly repulsed by their very obvious and slick attempt at wooing an audience at the agnostics of the metaphysical, thereby maligning the significance of whatever they experienced. This book is merely a record of her work and I cant thank her enough for presenting it so boldly at the disposal of the general public. If it goes down well with you, you like it, otherwise you toss it in the trash can. There is no middle ground.
Beautiful read for those who know and believe in the limitations of our physical existence, not very convincing for those who don't yet see through it and are looking for an impressive external reason to do so and an absolute hogwash for those who discard the intangible metaphysical realm as paranoia of the tin-foil hat wearing conspiracy theorists.