Writing an autobiography tends to be a very risky business. Not least because the writer has to balance their viewpoints with historical fact so as not to appear too subjective, but also because it can turn into a process of self-appeasement.
In his autobiography, General David Richards discusses his family upbringing, more than four decades of military service starting from the Cold War era till the intervention in Syria, and recurring stories of personalities who influenced him greatly. The writer takes you on a highly personalised and descriptive tour of different countries where he was deployed but also candidly reveals the inner workings of bureaucratic monoliths in the form of NATO, the EU, UK's MoD etc. It is filled with good and sometimes unpleasant anecdotes or experiences dealing with military and civilian leaders of various backgrounds.
The reader begins to realise that the writer had been a highly enthusiastic and routinely non-conformist military officer (in the sense of 'absolute subordination') who was willing to take great risk at personal as well as professional costs; not only as a young officer but also as Chief of Defence Staff, essentially superior to the services chiefs.
There are instances of taking initiative throughout his career that some might find to be reckless, or outright exaggerations. What I feel, personally, is that the General has always been guided by his personal convictions, and he simply reinstated them. I have read several memoirs and autobiographies in which authors have tried to inflate their personalities and influence for personal fame. General Richards, throughout his autobiography and especially the conclusion, expresses gratidude (by name) to the officers, soldiers and civilians who helped him in his duties. Such repeat gestures cannot just be taken as passing courtesies but genuine expressions of the self.
This is a book that is engaging and also very insightful, containing valuable leadership lessons on how to handle high-pressure situations and deal with difficult people from different cultures. I will go far as to say that General Richards took a great risk by retaining his personal convictions and foregoing any feeble attempts at political correctness (which has become a rather pitiful norm among writers of memoirs and biographies). The writer stands by what he believed and did, as a true soldier, and leaves it to the reader and history alike, to judge him.
This was the first autobiography of a British public figure that I selected to read, and I am glad it did not disappoint. Thankfully, it was not embedded with the 'holier-than-thou' vibe.