"So what's a cobra doing in upstate New York?"
To find out the answer to this existential question we need to return to North Bath, a serious contender for the Unluckiest City in America Award. It's been ten years since the events described in "Nobody's Fool" and little has changed apparently in this jinxed, destitute urbis. Sully, the protagonist of the first episode, has had a bit of personal luck in the financial department, but he has a new set of worries now that he is in his sixties: boredom since he doesn't have to work as hard, a heart engine that is fast clogging and sputtering, a girlfriend (Ruth) that feels trapped both in the town and in their relationship, miscommunications with his son, and so on ...
Yet, while he still plays a major role in the current debacle, the main character of the study this time is not Sully but his old Nemesis, constable Douglas Raymer, now advanced to the position of Chief of Police for North Bath, despite being considered a moron by the whole population of the city.
Raymer had always been tortured by self-doubt, allowing other people's opinions about him to trump his own so thoroughly that he was never sure he actually had any.
Poisonous snakes in his tenement building are only the tip of the iceberg in the list of troubles haunting Raymer, troubles going all the way back to being bullied in school for being slower than most and easily flustered. Even now, four decades later, Douglas is still pondering what his old teacher, the enchanting Miss Beryl Peoples, tried to tell him in the margin notes of his literary compositions:
The sides of the old lady's triangle were 'Subject', 'Audience' and 'Speaker', and most of the questions she scribbled in the margins of their papers had to do with the relationship between them. "What are you writing ABOUT?" "Just who do you imagine your AUDIENCE to be?" "Who are you? Who is this Douglas Raymer?"
Short answer: he is everybody's fool in the town of North Bath, and this is his story ...
Subject : the ordinary lives and worries of small people living in a small town, with a particular focus on the loser attitude of Douglas Raymer, told in long interior monologues that devolve later in the novel into a full blown schizoid episode that reminded me strongly of the personality of Jim Carey in "The Mask". The funny side of his situation are as entertaining as the ones in the movie, but the book is much better at showing Raymer as a redeemable human being.
Revise, revise, revise, Miss Beryl always recommended. Writing is thinking, and good, honest thinking involves revision.
Just like the character in the movie, Raymer takes the punches from everybody around him, until he reaches the end of his tether in a fateful day that see him pitching forward into an open grave (not a spoiler, it happens in the very first chapter) . He could curl up and hide as the fool he has been so far, or he can revise the story of his life, as Miss Peoples advised him so long ago.
Something in these people's natures, he'd reluctantly concluded, was rigid, unalterable. They needed to believe that luck ruled the world and that theirs was bad and would remain so forever and ever, amen, a credo that let them off the hook and excused them from truly engaging in the present, much less the future.
The dilemma of Douglas Raymer is reiterated in the lives of many other inhabitants of the town of North Bath, and for that matter in so many other post-industrial centers of industry around the world that have become ghost towns. You either give up, or you try to work something out with the lemons life gave you. For me, Richard Russo is unique among my favorite writers for the empathy he feels for these characters, for his ability to find something to laugh about in even the bleakest situation, and for his refusal to give in to despair. As Ruth, the waitress, remarks, "We all fuck up." at one point in our lifetime, sometimes with tragic consequences, but we still have to wake up the next day and deal with the consequences. In a similar situation are Sully, still angry at his abusive father and unable to connect in his turn with his son. So is Carl Roebuck, the crooked gigolo who deals with health issues and insolvency and divorce. So is the town manager who tries to turn the bad luck around and deals with a clinically depressed wife at home. So is Ruth's daughter who cannot disengage herself from an ex-husband who already put her in hospital twice. Or Jerome, the smooth policeman with the expensive car from the prosperous town nearby. Only Charice, the no-nonsense police dispatcher in North Bath seems to have her s__t together.
"You are a fool. So am I. So's just about everybody we know, dude. I mean, look around. Who's not a damn fool most of the time?"
She's there both for her brother Jerome, and for clueless Raymer, especially when he moons about his recently deceased and adulterous wife.
"Stop punishing yourself. Bottom line? You weren't rich, so it must've been love. It just didn't last."
"Yeah, but why not? It's not like I changed. I didn't trick her. Right to the end, I was the same guy she married."
"Maybe that's it. Maybe she wanted you to change. Grow. Try new things. Expand your horizons."
"She 'was' my horizon. I was supposed to be 'her' horizon."
"That's asking a lot."
—«»—«»—«»—
The novel is rather long, or at least feel a bit slower than the first one, but I have a feeling it will be one of my top three reads of 2018, despite some stiff competition. Richard Russo may not be as lyrical as Pessoa, or as highbrow as Hesse, but he is closer to my heart than them and many others I read only to pass the time of day. He may take some time to get to the point, but once you get there it is like an illumination. "Nobody's Fool" and "Everybody's Fool" show me that it's OK to be poor, to make mistakes, just as long as you keep revising your story. Here's a sample of the condensed Russo wisdom from this lecture.
Okay, so the brain was a strange, unruly organ.
- - - -
"You don't have to be hard, just because the world is."
- - - -
"I also think it's possible for us to be better people tomorrow than we are today."