What do you think?
Rate this book
The Certainty of Faith
The timeliness of this book, first published in 1901, is shown by the fact that a great number of academic texts quote from it. "The Certainty of Faith" is one of the small but powerful classics written by one of the greatest theologians Holland has ever produced. Bavinck examines the difference between the certainty of science and that of religion historically, biblically, and theologically.
152 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1901
40 people are currently reading
348 people want to read
About the author
Herman Bavinck
128 books202 followersHerman Bavinck (1854-1921) succeeded Abraham Kuyper as professor of systematic theology at the Free University of Amsterdam in 1902.
His nephew was Johan Herman Bavinck.
His nephew was Johan Herman Bavinck.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 57 reviews
April 4, 2021
This is one of those rare books that is able to make profound epistemological points while always remaining at the level of the layman. Reformed people might claim they are above the charismatic desire for “experience” and “emotion.” I suggest many are on the same level. If your faith is pointed towards the intensity of your emotions, if you don’t like celebrating the Lord’s Supper often (not necessarily weekly) because it wouldn’t be spay-shul, then I suggest you are much closer to the charismatic than you might want to admit.
Bavinck’s profound insight is that knowledge isn’t the same thing as certainty. He writes,
Truth is agreement between thought and reality and thus expresses a relation between the contents of our consciousness and the object of our knowledge. Certainty, however, is not a relationship but a capacity, a quality, a state of the knowing subject. One’s spirit may assume different states in reaction to different statements or propositions (Bavinck 19).
If you can’t grasp and appreciate this distinction, then you will be fair game for all sorts of philosophical con artists. In other words, how I feel about the truth is quite irrelevant to the truth or falsity of the proposition.
Pietism: The Harbinger of Humanism
The early Reformers certainly had their doubts like us. There was a crucial difference, though. Bavinck writes,
But the difference between the Reformers and their later disciples was that they did not foster or feed such a
condition. They saw no good in it and were not content to remain in doubt (39).
We can add one more point: you can look to the intensity of your emotions or you can look to Christ (corollary: The Lord’s Supper helps. Take it). Bavinck doesn’t mention it but this is the problem of the terrible Halfway Covenant. You didn’t look to Christ. You had to convince the sessions of the intensity of your emotional experience. The sick irony is that the membership requirements for Halfway members were the same as the membership requirements of full members in the better Calvinist churches on the continent.
A few pages later Bavinck notes that this pietism paved the way for secularism. He is correct but he doesn’t develop the point. I think it can be argued like this. This leads to common-ground, emotionally-based political orders. While it isn’t clear how that then leads to liberalism, it almost always does.
I truly hate pietism with all my heart.
Bavinck has a side line on the nature of revelation that is sometimes controversial but nevertheless correct: “Revelation is an organism with a life of its own” (61). He doesn’t mean it evolves evolutionistically or in a Hegelian fashion (fun fact: Hegel was actually skeptical of evolution, if only because he didn’t come up with it). Rather, it ties all facts together under a single idea. It is its own idea by which it must be grasped.
Another fatal problem with experience-based religion is that none of the essentials of the Christian faith can be deduced from experience. Nothing in my day-to-day life tells me of substitutionary atonement, the Trinity, or the Resurrection.
Faithful to covenant thinking, Bavinck contrasts experience-based religion with that of judicial, ethical choice. I either choose to believe in Christ or I don’t. Experience isn’t all that relevant (78ff). If faith includes understanding, either I believe in the promises or I don’t. I don’t have to answer “Do you know that you know that you really know” type questions.
That doesn’t mean emotions are wrong. Far from it. Bavinck is working with a creational view of man: man believes with his heart, his totality of existence (including both reason and emotion, the latter never controls the former).
The Mechanics of Faith
For more info, see Bavinck’s Prolegomena.
“Promise and faith are correlates. They address themselves to one another” (83). Moreover, “Faith is not the ground which carries the truth, nor is it the source from which knowledge flows to him. Rather, it is the soul’s organ.”
But can faith be certain? Answering this question might be tricky. We’ve already established that I can have varying degrees of certainty regarding something. Bavinck, however, suggests that faith can be absolutely certain. What is he getting at? This certainty is not something added on from the outside. Rather, it “is contained in faith from the outside and in time organically issues from it” (85). In other words, I do not trust salvation on the grounds of my faith but through it.
Bavinck has an admirable final section on the sacraments. It’s strange (well, not really) that many discussions on certainty and assurance often ignore the sacraments. The sacraments seal the promise of God to me (89). The final two pages end with the “cultural mandate,” though Bavinck doesn’t call it such. I share in Christ’s anointing and am a prophet, priest, and king.
Bavinck’s profound insight is that knowledge isn’t the same thing as certainty. He writes,
Truth is agreement between thought and reality and thus expresses a relation between the contents of our consciousness and the object of our knowledge. Certainty, however, is not a relationship but a capacity, a quality, a state of the knowing subject. One’s spirit may assume different states in reaction to different statements or propositions (Bavinck 19).
If you can’t grasp and appreciate this distinction, then you will be fair game for all sorts of philosophical con artists. In other words, how I feel about the truth is quite irrelevant to the truth or falsity of the proposition.
Pietism: The Harbinger of Humanism
The early Reformers certainly had their doubts like us. There was a crucial difference, though. Bavinck writes,
But the difference between the Reformers and their later disciples was that they did not foster or feed such a
condition. They saw no good in it and were not content to remain in doubt (39).
We can add one more point: you can look to the intensity of your emotions or you can look to Christ (corollary: The Lord’s Supper helps. Take it). Bavinck doesn’t mention it but this is the problem of the terrible Halfway Covenant. You didn’t look to Christ. You had to convince the sessions of the intensity of your emotional experience. The sick irony is that the membership requirements for Halfway members were the same as the membership requirements of full members in the better Calvinist churches on the continent.
A few pages later Bavinck notes that this pietism paved the way for secularism. He is correct but he doesn’t develop the point. I think it can be argued like this. This leads to common-ground, emotionally-based political orders. While it isn’t clear how that then leads to liberalism, it almost always does.
I truly hate pietism with all my heart.
Bavinck has a side line on the nature of revelation that is sometimes controversial but nevertheless correct: “Revelation is an organism with a life of its own” (61). He doesn’t mean it evolves evolutionistically or in a Hegelian fashion (fun fact: Hegel was actually skeptical of evolution, if only because he didn’t come up with it). Rather, it ties all facts together under a single idea. It is its own idea by which it must be grasped.
Another fatal problem with experience-based religion is that none of the essentials of the Christian faith can be deduced from experience. Nothing in my day-to-day life tells me of substitutionary atonement, the Trinity, or the Resurrection.
Faithful to covenant thinking, Bavinck contrasts experience-based religion with that of judicial, ethical choice. I either choose to believe in Christ or I don’t. Experience isn’t all that relevant (78ff). If faith includes understanding, either I believe in the promises or I don’t. I don’t have to answer “Do you know that you know that you really know” type questions.
That doesn’t mean emotions are wrong. Far from it. Bavinck is working with a creational view of man: man believes with his heart, his totality of existence (including both reason and emotion, the latter never controls the former).
The Mechanics of Faith
For more info, see Bavinck’s Prolegomena.
“Promise and faith are correlates. They address themselves to one another” (83). Moreover, “Faith is not the ground which carries the truth, nor is it the source from which knowledge flows to him. Rather, it is the soul’s organ.”
But can faith be certain? Answering this question might be tricky. We’ve already established that I can have varying degrees of certainty regarding something. Bavinck, however, suggests that faith can be absolutely certain. What is he getting at? This certainty is not something added on from the outside. Rather, it “is contained in faith from the outside and in time organically issues from it” (85). In other words, I do not trust salvation on the grounds of my faith but through it.
Bavinck has an admirable final section on the sacraments. It’s strange (well, not really) that many discussions on certainty and assurance often ignore the sacraments. The sacraments seal the promise of God to me (89). The final two pages end with the “cultural mandate,” though Bavinck doesn’t call it such. I share in Christ’s anointing and am a prophet, priest, and king.
August 27, 2019
This was such an excellent book that, at this difficult time in my life, rooted me more in the Word of God. It is not an easy read. But Bavinck goes through the scientific certainty and why that type of certainty will not work for matters of faith. Then he works through the various ways we try to gain certainty in matters of faith. Finally he ends by making the ground of our certainty of faith in that we have a word from God. We cannot base our certainty in our own faith. It must be in God and His Word. Certainty, that unshakable, free, joyful, certainty comes from looking at God's Word and saying: Here my faith will rest. What God says I believe. I will not move from it. Really good book.
October 15, 2025
This is the best book on assurance in salvation that I’ve ever read . Bavinck unpacks what it means to have faith in God’s word. It’s technical but Bavinck’s tracing of the churches understanding of assurance and how he contrasts Christianity and secularism is tremendously helpful.
—
Even better the 2nd time through.
—
Even better the 2nd time through.
December 31, 2025
"Let the plant of faith therefore take root in the soil of the promises of God, and thus it will naturally bear the fruit of certainty. And the deeper and firmer it drives its roots into the soil, the stronger will be its growth, the longer its shoots, the richer its fruit." (93)
Simply outstanding.
Simply outstanding.
January 3, 2020
Excelente!
March 16, 2026
Timely. Insightful. Encouraging.
B.B. Warfield wrote that in these pages, "extensive learning, sound thinking, and profound religious feeling are smelted intimately together into a product of singular charm." (xix). I agree with that statement.
This book is about what the title suggests: the certainty of faith. But more specifically, this book discusses what faith is, where/what it should rest in, how it grows, and where it comes from.
This book is like a verbal espresso: short, strong, and highly stimulating. Further, Bavick does not back away from his intelligence and there were a couple of times that the reading was hard to follow. So all this combined makes for an enjoyable steak rather than the milk that is often read in our age (1 Corinthians 3; Hebrews 5).
To give you an insight into what this book is I will use Daniel Shrocks helpful introduction.
Bavinck writes as a product of the enlightenment. Not meaning he is a student of it, but rather, that the world is. So he writes not from a distant patristic position (like sometimes the church fathers can), but rather a familiar one that we relate to.
Within this, he understands that subjectivism pervades post-Enlightenment thought so he offers a helpful framework that might be at first surprising.
He argues that "no one can escape the subjective nature of faith. After all, it is the Christian who believes what is objectively given to him in scripture." (xxv). This is because faith is "an act of the believing subject." (xxv).
Through this lens he observes 2 features of what a subjective faith entails: "the epistemological certainty of faith and the experiential certainty of faith." (xxv). Or rather, knowing and feeling. As Daniel Schrock says, "[T]his book charts a course for why and how our faith can be certain in both respects." (xxv).
Throughout the book, there are a couple of themes, arguments, sections, and ideas that persist or are notable: the relationship between faith and science, the role of apologetics in the Christian faith, Bavincks dialogue with other traditions within the household of Christianity, his interaction with the Church of Rome, the impact the Christian worldview has on every sphere of human life (meaning that Bavinck argues that "a properly functioning and invincibly assured Christian faith will draw the believer into the theater of creation and culture, not out of it." (xxi)), and finally, the belief that faith is native to humanity as God has created it.
This is all encompassed in this little book. Like I said, espresso.
I really enjoyed this and particularly appreciated that Bavinck did not feel a need to defend the scriptures reliability but rather presupposes its authenticity. Also, his love for the Heidelburg catechism: he continually alludes to it and the scriptures. Along with this, this is very well written; the entire book makes a sustained argument that crescendos, in the last section. Finally, bavink is deeply devotional while also being incredibly scholarly. I've never read anyone like him. Hopefully you understand what I mean by this quote that gives you the idea of what the whole book feels like:
"Faith is not the foundation which bears the truth. nor the source from which knowledge of the truth flows forth to them, but the organ of the soul by which it recognizes the objective truth as it stands on its own, the pail by which it draws the water of life from the fountain of the word of God. All perception and thought requires agreement between obiect and subject. It does not suffice for the sun to shine in the heavens; people also need an eye to behold the sun by its own light. it is not suffice for the visible world to be the embodiment of thoughts; people also need an intellect to follow these thoughts and to take them up into their consciousness. So too believers are nothing other than normal human beings, whose eyes have been opened again to the eternal and heavenly, whose hearts have learned again to understand the secrets of the kingdom of heaven. christians do not build their knowledge of the truth from faith, but through faith they penetrate ever deeper into the secrets of salvation. The word of God is thus always the firm ground on which they stand, the rock to which they cling, the starting point for their thinking, the source of their knowledge, the rule for their lives, the light to their path, and the lamp to their feet." (87-88).
Heart stirring, insightful, theologically orthodox, pastoral, and just plain brilliant.
B.B. Warfield wrote that in these pages, "extensive learning, sound thinking, and profound religious feeling are smelted intimately together into a product of singular charm." (xix). I agree with that statement.
This book is about what the title suggests: the certainty of faith. But more specifically, this book discusses what faith is, where/what it should rest in, how it grows, and where it comes from.
This book is like a verbal espresso: short, strong, and highly stimulating. Further, Bavick does not back away from his intelligence and there were a couple of times that the reading was hard to follow. So all this combined makes for an enjoyable steak rather than the milk that is often read in our age (1 Corinthians 3; Hebrews 5).
To give you an insight into what this book is I will use Daniel Shrocks helpful introduction.
Bavinck writes as a product of the enlightenment. Not meaning he is a student of it, but rather, that the world is. So he writes not from a distant patristic position (like sometimes the church fathers can), but rather a familiar one that we relate to.
Within this, he understands that subjectivism pervades post-Enlightenment thought so he offers a helpful framework that might be at first surprising.
He argues that "no one can escape the subjective nature of faith. After all, it is the Christian who believes what is objectively given to him in scripture." (xxv). This is because faith is "an act of the believing subject." (xxv).
Through this lens he observes 2 features of what a subjective faith entails: "the epistemological certainty of faith and the experiential certainty of faith." (xxv). Or rather, knowing and feeling. As Daniel Schrock says, "[T]his book charts a course for why and how our faith can be certain in both respects." (xxv).
Throughout the book, there are a couple of themes, arguments, sections, and ideas that persist or are notable: the relationship between faith and science, the role of apologetics in the Christian faith, Bavincks dialogue with other traditions within the household of Christianity, his interaction with the Church of Rome, the impact the Christian worldview has on every sphere of human life (meaning that Bavinck argues that "a properly functioning and invincibly assured Christian faith will draw the believer into the theater of creation and culture, not out of it." (xxi)), and finally, the belief that faith is native to humanity as God has created it.
This is all encompassed in this little book. Like I said, espresso.
I really enjoyed this and particularly appreciated that Bavinck did not feel a need to defend the scriptures reliability but rather presupposes its authenticity. Also, his love for the Heidelburg catechism: he continually alludes to it and the scriptures. Along with this, this is very well written; the entire book makes a sustained argument that crescendos, in the last section. Finally, bavink is deeply devotional while also being incredibly scholarly. I've never read anyone like him. Hopefully you understand what I mean by this quote that gives you the idea of what the whole book feels like:
"Faith is not the foundation which bears the truth. nor the source from which knowledge of the truth flows forth to them, but the organ of the soul by which it recognizes the objective truth as it stands on its own, the pail by which it draws the water of life from the fountain of the word of God. All perception and thought requires agreement between obiect and subject. It does not suffice for the sun to shine in the heavens; people also need an eye to behold the sun by its own light. it is not suffice for the visible world to be the embodiment of thoughts; people also need an intellect to follow these thoughts and to take them up into their consciousness. So too believers are nothing other than normal human beings, whose eyes have been opened again to the eternal and heavenly, whose hearts have learned again to understand the secrets of the kingdom of heaven. christians do not build their knowledge of the truth from faith, but through faith they penetrate ever deeper into the secrets of salvation. The word of God is thus always the firm ground on which they stand, the rock to which they cling, the starting point for their thinking, the source of their knowledge, the rule for their lives, the light to their path, and the lamp to their feet." (87-88).
Heart stirring, insightful, theologically orthodox, pastoral, and just plain brilliant.
October 23, 2025
As is typically the case with Bavinck, just because the book is small doesn't mean its contents are light! In these 102 pages, Bavinck aims to answer the question of how to justify faith's sense of certainty. His answer is essentially that the certainty of faith, as opposed to scientific certainty, is rooted in the recognition of divine testimony rather than experience. Below are a few scattered thoughts about the book, in no particular order.
I've always felt a sort of affinity between Bavinck and Plantinga on the epistemology of faith. I think this book reinforces that sense, but it clarifies the nuances that distinguish them.
Van Til and his followers have always claimed Bavinck as their own. I remain unconvinced, but there are a few lines in this book that could undoubtedly be read in a Van Tillian sense. I doubt if that's the best sense to make of those lines, but I see how a Bahnsen or an Oliphant could read these words and come away feeling like Bavinck was on their team.
Bavinck offers some truly excellent criticisms of progressive theology (many of which are still applicable 100+ later), Romanism, Pietism, and even trends within 17th-18th century Reformed churches (especially the tendency among later Puritans and their Dutch Nadere Reformatie counterparts toward spiritual navel-gazing). In the latter case, I think he may go too hard in places, but the main points are valid and directly applicable to local church ministry.
I find it very interesting that Bavinck grounds the general Neo-Calvinist impulse for cultural engagement in the foundational nature of faith. Basically, if certainty of faith is the goal of the Christian life, your tendency will be to retreat into yourself and your spiritual practices. But if certainty of faith is the starting line, your tendency will be to live your whole life facing outward, working to benefit the world in gratefulness to God. I think there's something to this, even if I may not be as far on the Neo-Calvinist side of the scale as Bavinck was himself. It's also worth noting that he does offer a gentle critique of his own camp's wont to get "lost in the world."
I found the first chapter to be the highlight of the whole book. I felt like it was the most devotional part of the whole. As the argument wore on, it never totally lost that devotional character, but it did take onto itself a more technical flavor. Bavinck's technical argumentation always has devotion as its end goal, and that comes through here. Still, I'd love to have a book of his that I could hand to a regular church member (or even just my wife).
I appreciated Schrock's editorial footnotes. Unlike Brock and Sutanto's (excellent) translation of Christian Worldview, which largely expects you to be familiar with the ideas of figures like Renan, Kant, Schliermacher, Ritschl, etc., this one offers the basic information required to follow the arguments. Hopefully that makes this book more accessible to educated laymen who can handle technical theology but aren't particular familiar with 18th-19th century philosophy.
I've always felt a sort of affinity between Bavinck and Plantinga on the epistemology of faith. I think this book reinforces that sense, but it clarifies the nuances that distinguish them.
Van Til and his followers have always claimed Bavinck as their own. I remain unconvinced, but there are a few lines in this book that could undoubtedly be read in a Van Tillian sense. I doubt if that's the best sense to make of those lines, but I see how a Bahnsen or an Oliphant could read these words and come away feeling like Bavinck was on their team.
Bavinck offers some truly excellent criticisms of progressive theology (many of which are still applicable 100+ later), Romanism, Pietism, and even trends within 17th-18th century Reformed churches (especially the tendency among later Puritans and their Dutch Nadere Reformatie counterparts toward spiritual navel-gazing). In the latter case, I think he may go too hard in places, but the main points are valid and directly applicable to local church ministry.
I find it very interesting that Bavinck grounds the general Neo-Calvinist impulse for cultural engagement in the foundational nature of faith. Basically, if certainty of faith is the goal of the Christian life, your tendency will be to retreat into yourself and your spiritual practices. But if certainty of faith is the starting line, your tendency will be to live your whole life facing outward, working to benefit the world in gratefulness to God. I think there's something to this, even if I may not be as far on the Neo-Calvinist side of the scale as Bavinck was himself. It's also worth noting that he does offer a gentle critique of his own camp's wont to get "lost in the world."
I found the first chapter to be the highlight of the whole book. I felt like it was the most devotional part of the whole. As the argument wore on, it never totally lost that devotional character, but it did take onto itself a more technical flavor. Bavinck's technical argumentation always has devotion as its end goal, and that comes through here. Still, I'd love to have a book of his that I could hand to a regular church member (or even just my wife).
I appreciated Schrock's editorial footnotes. Unlike Brock and Sutanto's (excellent) translation of Christian Worldview, which largely expects you to be familiar with the ideas of figures like Renan, Kant, Schliermacher, Ritschl, etc., this one offers the basic information required to follow the arguments. Hopefully that makes this book more accessible to educated laymen who can handle technical theology but aren't particular familiar with 18th-19th century philosophy.
January 19, 2026
4.5 ⭐️s
While I have interacted with some articles and excerpts from Bavinck, this little book of his is my first time reading one of his works. I plan to move on to The Wonderful Works of God next.
In this book he explores and explains where certainty and assurance is found for the Christian. This is a topic I am passionate about and one of the many reasons why I am convictionally Protestant. The first two chapters were helpful, but the third chapter is where it really took off for me.
While our faith is always imperfect, in a world that at times glorifies doubt, Bavinck reminds us that certainty and security are not mystical experiences that are only accessible to some, but instead gifts that by definition accompany faith. It is possible for any believer in Jesus to know beyond a shadow of a doubt that they are “in Christ” and eternally secure.
“The object of faith must be perfectly reliable, infallible, eternal truth, so that I can abandon myself to it in distress and death, for both time and eternity…No human word, no results of scientific investigation, no ideal fashioned by the imagination, no proposition built by human reasoning can be the foundation of our hope for eternity. For all these things are shaky and fallible; they cannot support the edifice of hope, and will soon collapse into ruin. By its very nature, faith—that is, religious faith—can only rest upon a word or promise of God, on something that proceeds from his mouth and is revealed to man in a natural or supernatural way.”
While I have interacted with some articles and excerpts from Bavinck, this little book of his is my first time reading one of his works. I plan to move on to The Wonderful Works of God next.
In this book he explores and explains where certainty and assurance is found for the Christian. This is a topic I am passionate about and one of the many reasons why I am convictionally Protestant. The first two chapters were helpful, but the third chapter is where it really took off for me.
While our faith is always imperfect, in a world that at times glorifies doubt, Bavinck reminds us that certainty and security are not mystical experiences that are only accessible to some, but instead gifts that by definition accompany faith. It is possible for any believer in Jesus to know beyond a shadow of a doubt that they are “in Christ” and eternally secure.
“The object of faith must be perfectly reliable, infallible, eternal truth, so that I can abandon myself to it in distress and death, for both time and eternity…No human word, no results of scientific investigation, no ideal fashioned by the imagination, no proposition built by human reasoning can be the foundation of our hope for eternity. For all these things are shaky and fallible; they cannot support the edifice of hope, and will soon collapse into ruin. By its very nature, faith—that is, religious faith—can only rest upon a word or promise of God, on something that proceeds from his mouth and is revealed to man in a natural or supernatural way.”
December 19, 2025
As someone who has struggled with certainty of faith for many years, this book is a true balm! I have always said that Bavinck doesn’t miss and all Christian’s should be reading him, but this was such a helpful little book.
My biggest take away is the importance of faith. No where in the Bible does it glorify or encourage doubt. No- it’s always TRUST in the Lord for He is good. I’m sure that a lack of assurance is caused by too much thinking of oneself and not enough on Christ.
“Because they are Christians, they are human in the full, true sense. They love the flowers growing at their feet and marvel at the stars sparkling above their heads. They do not despise art, which is a precious gift of God to them, and do not scorn science, which is a gift to them from the Father of lights. They believe that everything created by God is good, and that nothing is reprehensible if partaken with thankfulness. They labor not for success or wages, but do what their hand finds to do, seeing by [the light of] the commandment but blind to the future. They do good works ere they think about them, and bear fruits before knowing it. They are like flowers which spread their sweet fragrance unawares. In a word, they are people of God, perfectly equipped unto every good work. And while for them to live is Christ, to die is gain.”
My biggest take away is the importance of faith. No where in the Bible does it glorify or encourage doubt. No- it’s always TRUST in the Lord for He is good. I’m sure that a lack of assurance is caused by too much thinking of oneself and not enough on Christ.
“Because they are Christians, they are human in the full, true sense. They love the flowers growing at their feet and marvel at the stars sparkling above their heads. They do not despise art, which is a precious gift of God to them, and do not scorn science, which is a gift to them from the Father of lights. They believe that everything created by God is good, and that nothing is reprehensible if partaken with thankfulness. They labor not for success or wages, but do what their hand finds to do, seeing by [the light of] the commandment but blind to the future. They do good works ere they think about them, and bear fruits before knowing it. They are like flowers which spread their sweet fragrance unawares. In a word, they are people of God, perfectly equipped unto every good work. And while for them to live is Christ, to die is gain.”
January 22, 2026
A masterpiece bringing faith back into the domain it belongs to; making it abundantly clear that it need not take orders from the “certainty of science”. Lots of mic drops, some helpful “where did we go wrong” narratives, and a thorough explanation on the nature of faith near the end that I’ll have to revisit.
Who should read it? Parts of it were pretty nuanced and got lost in the Bavinck sauce, but I after rereading certain sections what was once thick gravy turned into a lighter salad dressing. I’d maybe consider it a Mere Christianity 2.0 with a polemic bend and a clear emphasis on faith (who would’ve guessed?) and its place in the Christian life.
Who should read it? Parts of it were pretty nuanced and got lost in the Bavinck sauce, but I after rereading certain sections what was once thick gravy turned into a lighter salad dressing. I’d maybe consider it a Mere Christianity 2.0 with a polemic bend and a clear emphasis on faith (who would’ve guessed?) and its place in the Christian life.
December 31, 2025
The best book I’ve read all year. Probably the most important book I’ve read in years. Bavinck (in this new translation by Daniel Schrock) has given to us a knockout, sweeping exploration of saving faith—its true nature, the certainty that comes hand in hand with it, and its personal and corporate fruit.
October 20, 2025
“And the two develop in connection with each other. As refuge-seeking confidence increases, so too does assured confidence. And if the latter is small and weak, we may indubitably infer that the former is also infirm and imperfect.”
December 17, 2025
Herman Bavinck’s “The Certainty of Faith” is a small book, and that smallness is part of its strength. It does not wander or posture. Bavinck says what needs to be said and then stops. The brevity feels deliberate, even pastoral. He does not confuse length with depth, and the result is a work that feels clear rather than compressed.
What stands out most is the way Bavinck holds together qualities we often separate. He is both a mystic and a clinician. He speaks of faith as something lived and felt, rooted deep in the soul, and he examines it with careful, disciplined thought. He never turns faith into raw emotion, and he never dissects it until it goes cold. He studies faith as a living thing.
Bavinck moves easily between science and theology, and that ease gives the book its authority. He does not shy away from modern questions or psychological insight, but he also refuses to let them rule the conversation. Faith, for Bavinck, is not irrational. At the same time, it does not depend on laboratory proof. Its certainty rests in God’s self revelation and takes shape in the life of the believer. He keeps his balance where others often fall to one side or the other.
Reading Bavinck feels like watching an alchemist at work in a King Arthur’s court. He takes doubt, reason, experience, and doctrine and turns them into something solid and luminous. He does not rely on tricks. He trusts that all truth belongs to God and therefore has nothing to fear.
It is also worth saying how fortunate we are to be living in a period of recovery for Dutch theology. For a long time, figures like Bavinck were treated as specialists’ territory, cited more than read. Now they are being returned to the church. “The Certainty of Faith” feels especially timely in this recovery. It reminds us that this tradition was never merely academic. It was written for the life of faith, for pastors and people, for seasons of doubt as much as confidence.
What stands out most is the way Bavinck holds together qualities we often separate. He is both a mystic and a clinician. He speaks of faith as something lived and felt, rooted deep in the soul, and he examines it with careful, disciplined thought. He never turns faith into raw emotion, and he never dissects it until it goes cold. He studies faith as a living thing.
Bavinck moves easily between science and theology, and that ease gives the book its authority. He does not shy away from modern questions or psychological insight, but he also refuses to let them rule the conversation. Faith, for Bavinck, is not irrational. At the same time, it does not depend on laboratory proof. Its certainty rests in God’s self revelation and takes shape in the life of the believer. He keeps his balance where others often fall to one side or the other.
Reading Bavinck feels like watching an alchemist at work in a King Arthur’s court. He takes doubt, reason, experience, and doctrine and turns them into something solid and luminous. He does not rely on tricks. He trusts that all truth belongs to God and therefore has nothing to fear.
It is also worth saying how fortunate we are to be living in a period of recovery for Dutch theology. For a long time, figures like Bavinck were treated as specialists’ territory, cited more than read. Now they are being returned to the church. “The Certainty of Faith” feels especially timely in this recovery. It reminds us that this tradition was never merely academic. It was written for the life of faith, for pastors and people, for seasons of doubt as much as confidence.
May 11, 2026
Only 100 pages, but really delightful and thought-provoking. I should read it a few more times. One highlight on pp. 88–89:
[T]he certainty of truth does not suffice for Christians; along with this they also need certainty of salvation. They only come to rest and boast in the freedom of the children of God if their faith is certain not just of the object on which it leans, but certain also about itself. These two kinds of certainty may be distinct, but they cannot be divorced from one another; they are most intimately related—the one does not exist without the other. In this regard, faith is like knowledge. Knowledge involves full certainty not just about its object, but also simultaneously about itself. If we know—that is, really and certainly know—something, we thereby know, of ourselves and immediately, that we know it. Real, true knowledge excludes all doubt concerning itself. It does not arrive at this certainty concerning itself through reasoning, self-reflection, or logical argumentation; rather, the light that produces knowledge of the known object immediately returns to shine on itself and dispels all darkness. So it is with faith. A faith truly deserving of its name also brings with it its own certainty.
October 27, 2025
Truly a breath of fresh air. Bavinck navigates the issues of unbelief and doubt in an age that demands scientific knowledge for matters of faith. But scientific, empirical knowledge simply won’t do, we need a divine word from God if we are to establish in our minds, and also in our hearts, that God exists and rewards those who seek him.
Couldn’t think of a better book to read on the week of the reformation. It is brief! But it is not light. It is both intellectually gripping and weighty, but also pierces the heart and soul, as most of Bavinck’s writings do.
Heartily recommend to all believers and skeptics alike. Be challenged and be comforted by the certainty that faith brings by the spirit and word of Christ.
Couldn’t think of a better book to read on the week of the reformation. It is brief! But it is not light. It is both intellectually gripping and weighty, but also pierces the heart and soul, as most of Bavinck’s writings do.
Heartily recommend to all believers and skeptics alike. Be challenged and be comforted by the certainty that faith brings by the spirit and word of Christ.
November 12, 2025
Believing is therefore indeed a deed of moral energy, a deed of the highest spiritual power; it is the work of God par excellence, because it is his most precious and most glorious gift. It is to hold fast to God as seeing him who is the Unseeable, to know his love, to lean on his grace, to hope in his faithfulness. - Bavinck
April 22, 2017
A very good little book. A nice entryway to some of Bavinck's thought, while also showing some of his pastoral wisdom.
August 16, 2025
Absolute goldmine. So much wisdom packed into this little book. Hoping to reread soon.
March 18, 2021
This book was great. I did not want to put it down once I picked it up. Bavinck explains in detail humans need for certainty in Religion, what the effect of that certainty is on the heart and mind, and the only place that a solid and liberating certainty may be found. The most powerful part was as he contrasted Religious and Scientific certainty and how all people live with faith assumptions.
December 9, 2025
Herman Bavinck continues to bring new life to my soul, spilling forth the glory and grander of Christ in every word. He assures the believer that his faith does not rest in emotional experiences, intellectual erudition or mere historical evidences which fade in and with the desert sands. Nor does faith capitulate to the world’s philosophies and lust for doubt and uncertainty. Consider reading this tiny but mighty work from a most accomplished theologian to know upon what does the certainty faith rest.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
January 28, 2026
“They [Christians] do good works ere they think about them, and bear fruits before knowing it. They are like flowers which spread their sweet fragrance unawares. In a word, they are a people of God, perfectly equipped unto every good work. And while for them to live is Christ and to die is gain” (102).
November 30, 2018
Pequena pérola de Bavinck.
December 15, 2018
A great defense of the certain and organic nature of the Christian faith against rationalism, empiricism, positivism, introspective pietism, and radical 2K-ism.
April 27, 2020
Livro excelente, com uma conclusão especialmente bela!
December 5, 2025
Excellent work on faith! Faith is the best response to God’s revelation.
February 14, 2026
Reminds me a lot of the technicality mixed with understandability of C.S. Lewis. At times it winds, but then gets to super powerful, easy to understand and digest points. A great little book!
April 15, 2026
A bite-sized work from not only one of the greatest of the Reformed dogmaticians, but a master prose stylist as well. Required reading for all Christians.
May 4, 2026
Dense but so rich. The writing style is so wonderful which I was surprised by since it was translated.
April 8, 2022
Bavinck provides and excellent summary of the certainty of faith. He shows the historical grounding of our preset struggle with certainty and the necessity of recovering it. All Christians will benefit from this short volume. Tolle lege.
October 17, 2025
Organicism, grace restores nature, gospel as levening agent in all of life, short and sweet Bavinck.
May we look to Christ - our confidence and certainty is in Him who is infallible - not our own philosophical reasoning or works.
May we look to Christ - our confidence and certainty is in Him who is infallible - not our own philosophical reasoning or works.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 57 reviews