In this volume Keith Dowman translates a curiously-unnamed biography (biographies?) of the venerated figure Drukpa Kunley, master of Mahamudra.
This work can be evaluated through several different lenses - as folklore, myth, hagiography, literature, and esoteric practice instruction. On several of those axes I am highly critical of this work, for reasons I will return to presently
Kunley is an exemplar of a very popular stock motif in Asia - the mad saint, who by virtue of possession and mastery of an esoteric lineage, lies outside the bounds of regularly-ordered society. In this sense, his unorthodox behavior, typically rendered as boozing and liberating the ladies with his prodigious sexual powers, can be taken to exemplify the natural spontaneity of the mind that is realized and perfected by the masters of the Mahamudra lineage.
Thus read on the level of mythology and folklore, there is some amusement and insight to be gained by a study of this work. In its bawdy, comic action, I was somewhat reminded of another beloved fixture of Tibetan culture - Uncle Donpa, the secular hero-fool whose comic misadventures are often extremely hilarious.
Now I must return to the focus of my criticism. I do not presume my own values to be universal, but that does not stop me from bringing them to bear in a cross-cultural analysis of the works of a very different tradition. Nor should it, because I do not claim any universal status to my conclusions - this is how this work appears to me as an artifact.
On that level, I will observe what I hope is obvious to most students of Tibetan culture - it is historically a crushingly patriarchal society, in which women have systematically been displaced and marginalized, especially by the political and religious establishment. Despite weak and unpersuasive protestations to the contrary, perhaps singling out the mythological figure of Yeshe Tsogyel as an important woman teacher, the reality is that women have virtual no presence in the long history of Tibetan religious culture whatsoever.
So it gives me pause when we see the heavily-repeated pattern of Kunley walking in, breaking up a family, sexually enlivening a female subject, and hitting the road without looking back. Whoever wrote this material - Dowman never tells us - assures us that he knew what he was doing, and the lucky women who caught his fancy achieved liberation by virtue of his sexual ministrations. I'm sort of reminded of the axiom that history is written by the winners.
I think it needs to be emphasized that there are in fact teachers in the west who take this conduct as a model, and justify behavior that is patently in the service of their all-too-human appetites in the name of some sort of antinomian liberation from conventional values. And I have known through long personal experience the havoc that can wreak on spiritual communities and on individuals, and I do know people who have not fully recovered decades after the fact, when some self-professed spiritual guru decided to have his way with his disciple's wives as part of his great teaching.
This is a real thing that happens, and it really does destroy people's happiness. And for those who would defend such conduct as the inconceivable display that can't be evaluated by mere mortals such as myself, I would ask, why is it, that these enlightened masters who are beyond the extremes of pleasure and pain, always seem to manifest their realization through sex, alcohol, and money? If they are outside of mundane care, why do we not see them instead taking up important but painful and disturbing altruistic work - say, a ministry with the homeless - since it's all of one taste to them?
Tibetan culture has its downsides like any other culture, and in my opinion the guru thing is really bad news, especially in the west. And I would maintain that in the west, we do not deserve to have gurus in the traditional sense until we have the capacity to first see them as what they are, and what they will always remain - human beings. That includes Chogyam Trungpa, and the Dalai Lama, and the Karmapa, and your personal lama.
Of course, Dowman strikes an enthusiastic tone from quite the opposite perspective, and it is no mystery that this work was initially published by devotees of Adi Da, who has his own ignominious track record of liberating the wives of his disciples while their husbands waited in the wings.
As a cultural and historical artifact, this work is illuminating. As a work of folklore, it is sometimes amusing but rather formulaic and repetitive. As a guide to practice, it is a disaster.