This book came up in Audible recommendations among LGBTQ romances, or I probably wouldn't have tried it, which would have been a shame. Now I am wishing that it wasn't her only novel available on Audible.
This is a first-class thriller, with enough twists to keep the mystery intriguing, racy content that fits well with Audible's recommendation (though it isn't a romance), a deeply flawed but very relatable protagonist. The main antagonist is perhaps a little too moustache-twirling evil, but then, he's a sociopath and a well-drawn one. The other characters, whether love interests, potential love interests, suspects or victims are also all interesting and flawed to various degrees.
Protagonist Josie is bipolar, stabilized with drugs, but beginning to lose her grounding, with her mania leading her to avoid looking after herself. It's a very believable descent into irrational behavior, without at all losing the reader's sympathy. This doesn't have easy answers. Josie thinks that her growing mania helps her, giving her more time and faster thoughts, but it's clear that she's hurting herself, taking too many risks and causing problems for everyone around her.
The various lesbian couples who form the suspect / victim pool have believable problems. It's especially interesting how most of them know Josie better than she knows them, having been a part of the bar scene during her major manic phase, about which she remembers little, so she's apprehensive about all of her interviews. She promises herself that she won't get into fights now she's no longer manic, then gets into fights for other reasons.
There are very few well-defined solutions to any of the problems raised, but even with the ambiguities all of the story threads are satisfyingly handled.
I do feel that chapter 1 shouldn't exist. Everything it does is done better by reflection in the remainder of the story. Lauren's viewpoint (the woman accused and acquitted of murder) isn't needed or helpful here.
I also think that Lauren's acquittal itself could have been a little more convincing. With the extremely strong circumstantial evidence, the motive Lauren has, and the fact that she wouldn't defend herself, it's very hard to buy into her walking away free from the trial. It would be good to have some reason for the jury not to convict, even if it was only prosecutorial error, which wouldn't affect whether or not Lauren committed the murder, or whether anyone would believe it.
Still, those are both minor narrative problems compared to the overall story, which was excellent. (As was the reading for Audible, by Tatiana Sokolov.)