I have a number of “cocktail recipe” books that tell you, say, how much vermouth to put in a martini. This isn’t that kind of book—because it’s so much more.
It’s partly so much more because the author founded one of the most cutting edge bars in Manhattan, and ultimately invented new cocktail techniques that are more mad scientist than friendly neighborhood bartender. You’ll learn in this book, for example, how to get perfect muddling technique using liquid nitrogen and a number of the drinks require a centrifuge to make properly.
But the innovative techniques are not the reason to buy this book. While extremely fun to read about (and possibly pursue if you have money for the equipment and enjoy a challenge), the real brilliance of this book is to learn the actual chemistry of cocktails. For example, the author goes into painstaking detail about how a drink’s flavor profile relates to the alcohol-by-volume, sugar content, acidity, carbonation, and most of all, temperature. In fact, the first 30 or so pages are about ice: how to make clear ice, effects of ice cube size, science of freezing and melting, shaking vs stirring, temperature consistency, etc. That kind of information isn’t absolutely necessary if you just like to have a drink on a Wednesday night, but it is both crucial and fascinating if you’ve ever wondered why your favorite drink tastes so much better in one bar than in the bar two doors down.
Nearly half the book is devoted to this kind of info as it relates to “classic cocktails.” The other half focuses on more nontraditional techniques, some of which require fancy equipment or chemicals and some of which are unexpectedly accessible. The last chapter then builds on those techniques to trace the author’s history of developing three drinks, showing more generally how his approach results in innovation. It’s a fitting, philosophical close to the technical wizardry that led us there.
In sum, everyone who is serious about their cocktails should own this book and read through it a few times. Your cocktails will turn out consistently better, and you’ll actually know why you’re doing what you’re doing.